Apache CXF vs Spring MVC

Overview

Apache CXF

Stacks28

Followers40

Votes0

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers519

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Apache CXF vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache CXF and Spring MVC are two popular frameworks used in web development. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: Apache CXF is a full-featured web services framework that is built on top of the Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE). It provides a wide range of features for building and consuming web services, including support for various protocols and data formats. On the other hand, Spring MVC is a part of the larger Spring framework and is focused on building web applications using the model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It provides a lightweight and flexible approach to web development.
Integration: Apache CXF is well-integrated with other Java EE technologies, such as JAX-WS and JAX-RS, making it a good choice for enterprise-level web service development. It also provides extensive support for various web service standards and specifications. In contrast, Spring MVC is tightly integrated with the Spring framework, which offers a wide range of features for enterprise application development, including dependency injection, transaction management, and aspect-oriented programming.
Flexibility: Apache CXF provides a high degree of flexibility and configurability, allowing developers to fine-tune the behavior of their web services. It offers multiple ways to configure endpoints and services, including XML-based configuration files and Java annotations. Spring MVC also provides a flexible programming model, but it takes advantage of the convention-over-configuration approach, reducing the need for explicit configuration.
Community and Ecosystem: Apache CXF has a large and active community of developers, making it easy to find support and resources. It has been widely adopted by major organizations and is used in many production environments. Spring MVC is also backed by a strong community and has a rich ecosystem of libraries and extensions that can be used to enhance its functionality.
Testing: Apache CXF provides comprehensive support for testing web services, including tools for generating test clients and mock services. It also offers integration with popular testing frameworks, such as JUnit. Spring MVC also provides testing support, but it focuses more on integration testing, allowing developers to test the entire web application stack.
Learning Curve: Apache CXF has a steeper learning curve compared to Spring MVC. This is mainly due to the complexity of web services development and the wide range of features provided by Apache CXF. On the other hand, Spring MVC has a more gentle learning curve and is often preferred by developers who are newcomers to web development or want a simpler approach.

In Summary, Apache CXF is a powerful web services framework with extensive features and integration capabilities, making it suitable for enterprise-level web service development. On the other hand, Spring MVC is a lightweight and flexible framework that focuses on building web applications using the MVC pattern, making it a popular choice for web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache CXF	Spring MVC
It helps you build and develop services using frontend programming APIs, like JAX-WS and JAX-RS. These services can speak a variety of protocols such as SOAP, XML/HTTP, RESTful HTTP, or CORBA and work over a variety of transports such as HTTP, JMS or JBI.	A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.
-	Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 28	Stacks 479
Followers 40	Followers 519
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Spring Boot Apache Tomcat	AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate

What are some alternatives to Apache CXF, Spring MVC?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Apache CXF vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache CXF and Spring MVC are two popular frameworks used in web development. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: Apache CXF is a full-featured web services framework that is built on top of the Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE). It provides a wide range of features for building and consuming web services, including support for various protocols and data formats. On the other hand, Spring MVC is a part of the larger Spring framework and is focused on building web applications using the model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It provides a lightweight and flexible approach to web development.
Integration: Apache CXF is well-integrated with other Java EE technologies, such as JAX-WS and JAX-RS, making it a good choice for enterprise-level web service development. It also provides extensive support for various web service standards and specifications. In contrast, Spring MVC is tightly integrated with the Spring framework, which offers a wide range of features for enterprise application development, including dependency injection, transaction management, and aspect-oriented programming.
Flexibility: Apache CXF provides a high degree of flexibility and configurability, allowing developers to fine-tune the behavior of their web services. It offers multiple ways to configure endpoints and services, including XML-based configuration files and Java annotations. Spring MVC also provides a flexible programming model, but it takes advantage of the convention-over-configuration approach, reducing the need for explicit configuration.
Community and Ecosystem: Apache CXF has a large and active community of developers, making it easy to find support and resources. It has been widely adopted by major organizations and is used in many production environments. Spring MVC is also backed by a strong community and has a rich ecosystem of libraries and extensions that can be used to enhance its functionality.
Testing: Apache CXF provides comprehensive support for testing web services, including tools for generating test clients and mock services. It also offers integration with popular testing frameworks, such as JUnit. Spring MVC also provides testing support, but it focuses more on integration testing, allowing developers to test the entire web application stack.
Learning Curve: Apache CXF has a steeper learning curve compared to Spring MVC. This is mainly due to the complexity of web services development and the wide range of features provided by Apache CXF. On the other hand, Spring MVC has a more gentle learning curve and is often preferred by developers who are newcomers to web development or want a simpler approach.

Apache CXF vs Spring MVC

Overview

Apache CXF vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?