StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Ant vs Closure Compiler

Apache Ant vs Closure Compiler

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Stacks250
Followers151
Votes7
GitHub Stars449
Forks449
Closure Compiler
Closure Compiler
Stacks281
Followers62
Votes5
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks1.2K

Apache Ant vs Closure Compiler: What are the differences?

  1. Build Automation Tool: Apache Ant is a build automation tool primarily used for Java projects, providing a way to automate assembling and compiling code. Closure Compiler, on the other hand, is a JavaScript optimizer that minimizes code and detects errors early in the development process.
  2. Language Compatibility: Apache Ant is primarily used for Java projects and works well with Java codebases. In contrast, Closure Compiler is tailored for optimizing and compiling JavaScript code.
  3. Purpose: Apache Ant is more focused on automating repetitive tasks in the build process, such as compiling code, running tests, and packaging the application. Closure Compiler, on the other hand, is specifically designed for optimizing JavaScript code for better performance and reducing file sizes.
  4. Configuration: Apache Ant requires XML configuration files to define build tasks and targets, making it more verbose and complex compared to Closure Compiler, which can be invoked through the command line with specific optimizations options.
  5. Output: Apache Ant typically generates artifacts like JAR files or WAR files, whereas Closure Compiler outputs optimized JavaScript code with reduced file sizes, making web applications faster and more efficient.
  6. Community and Support: Apache Ant has a larger and more established community given its longer history in the software development world, providing extensive documentation and resources. Closure Compiler, being a more specialized tool, has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on optimizing JavaScript code effectively.

In Summary, Apache Ant and Closure Compiler differ in their usage for build automation in Java and JavaScript projects, respectively, with variations in language compatibility, purpose, configuration, output, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Closure Compiler
Closure Compiler

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster. It is a true compiler for JavaScript. Instead of compiling from a source language to machine code, it compiles from JavaScript to better JavaScript. It parses your JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left. It also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls.

The most complete Java build and deployment tool available.;Platform neutral and can handle platform specific properties such as file separators;Can be used to perform platform specific tasks such as modifying the modified time of a file using 'touch' command;Scripts are written using plain XML. If you are already familiar with XML, you can learn pretty quickly;Automate complicated repetitive tasks;Interface to develop custom tasks;Can be easily invoked from the command line and it can integrate with free and commercial IDEs
parses JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left; checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls; transpiling some ECMAScript 6 code to ECMAScript 3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
449
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
449
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
250
Stacks
281
Followers
151
Followers
62
Votes
7
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Flexible
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Easy to write own java-build-hooks
Cons
  • 1
    Slow
  • 1
    Old and not widely used anymore
Pros
  • 1
    The best performing output
  • 1
    Small output size
  • 1
    Dead code elimination
  • 1
    ES6 support
  • 1
    Bundle support for CommonJS, ES6, .

What are some alternatives to Apache Ant, Closure Compiler?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana