StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Ant Design vs Supersonic

Ant Design vs Supersonic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Supersonic
Supersonic
Stacks2
Followers15
Votes0
Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K

Ant Design vs Supersonic: What are the differences?

Ant Design vs Supersonic

1. **User Interface Components**: Ant Design offers a wide range of customizable UI components, such as buttons, tabs, and forms, to create modern and responsive web designs. On the other hand, Supersonic focuses more on providing a streamlined and efficient interface for building mobile apps, with fewer UI components but specialized for mobile development.

2. **Community Support**: Ant Design has a large community of developers contributing to the project, providing extensive documentation, support, and regular updates. In contrast, Supersonic may have a smaller community base, which could affect the availability of resources and support for developers using the framework.

3. **Technology Stack**: Ant Design primarily focuses on React.js, offering a robust foundation for building web applications with component-based architecture. Supersonic, on the other hand, is built on top of the Ionic framework, which integrates with AngularJS to facilitate the development of cross-platform mobile applications.

4. **Styling and Theming**: Ant Design provides a set of predefined themes and a well-defined design language, making it easier for developers to maintain consistency in their UI designs. Supersonic, however, offers more flexibility in styling and theming, allowing developers to create unique and customized app designs according to their preferences.

5. **Performance and Optimization**: Ant Design emphasizes performance optimization, offering features like code splitting and lazy loading to enhance the overall speed and efficiency of web applications. In comparison, Supersonic focuses on mobile app performance by utilizing native device capabilities and optimizing native interactions for a smoother user experience.

6. **Target Audience**: Ant Design caters more towards web developers looking to create visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces for desktop and web applications. Conversely, Supersonic targets mobile app developers seeking a framework optimized for building feature-rich and high-performing applications for iOS and Android platforms.

In Summary, Ant Design and Supersonic differ in their focus on UI components, community support, technology stack, styling options, performance optimization, and target audience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Supersonic
Supersonic
Ant Design
Ant Design

Supersonic UI is a game-changer. It's an Ionic fork that changes the way you think about hybrid app performance. Supersonic's declarative UI style makes building complex mobile apps a breeze. In the background, the seamless interplay of native UI and HTML5 bakes an end-result that is 100% indistinguishable from any native app.

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Mobile-first CSS components;Native UI components, with CSS styling;Declarative UI;AngularJS Directives;SPA navigation with AngularJS;Support for other frameworks than AngularJS
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
53.9K
Stacks
2
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
15
Followers
1.7K
Votes
0
Votes
224
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap

What are some alternatives to Supersonic, Ant Design?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase