StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Ant Design vs React

Ant Design vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K

Ant Design vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Ant Design and React, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Design Elements: Ant Design is a comprehensive design system that includes a set of high-quality React components and a thorough design specification. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use UI components, icons, and layouts. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library used for building user interfaces. It provides a scalable and efficient way to create reusable UI components.

  2. UI Component Library: Ant Design provides a rich collection of UI components, such as buttons, forms, menus, tables, modals, and more. These components follow the design guidelines and can be easily customized. React, being a library, does not offer a built-in UI component library. Developers need to build or use third-party libraries to create UI components.

  3. Styling Approach: Ant Design provides its own CSS-in-JS solution called "styled-components" for styling its components. This allows developers to write dynamic CSS code directly in their JavaScript files. React, on the other hand, does not provide any specific styling approach. It is up to the developer to choose their preferred styling method, such as CSS, SASS, CSS modules, or CSS-in-JS libraries like styled-components.

  4. Internationalization (I18n) Support: Ant Design offers built-in internationalization support. It provides translation files and supports multiple languages out of the box. React, being a library, does not have built-in internationalization capabilities. Developers need to implement it separately using third-party libraries or custom solutions.

  5. Design Consistency: Ant Design follows a comprehensive and consistent design guideline, ensuring a cohesive user experience across different components. This helps to maintain a consistent visual language throughout the application. React, being a library, does not enforce any specific design guideline. It is up to the developer to ensure design consistency across their React components.

  6. Component Theming: Ant Design provides a powerful theming system that allows developers to customize the visual style of components, such as colors, typography, and spacing, to match their application's branding. React, being a library, does not provide a built-in theming system. Developers need to implement custom theming solutions or use third-party libraries to achieve component theming.

In Summary, Ant Design is a comprehensive design system with a built-in UI component library, extensive design guidelines, CSS-in-JS styling, internationalization support, and theming capabilities. React, on the other hand, is a library for building user interfaces, without a built-in UI component library, design guidelines, or specific styling, internationalization, or theming support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Ant Design

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Ant Design
Ant Design

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
53.9K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
4.1K
Votes
224
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Integrations
No integrations available
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap

What are some alternatives to React, Ant Design?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase