Ant Design vs Material Components Web

Overview

Ant Design

Stacks1.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes224

GitHub Stars96.5K

Forks53.9K

Material Components Web

Stacks12

Followers23

Votes0

GitHub Stars17.1K

Forks2.1K

Ant Design vs Material Components Web: What are the differences?

Design Philosophy: Ant Design follows a more traditional and corporate design style, focusing on providing a professional look and feel to the user interface. In contrast, Material Components Web follows Google's Material Design guidelines, emphasizing a more playful and interactive design approach with vibrant colors and animations.
Component Library: Ant Design offers a comprehensive library of user interface components specifically tailored for enterprise applications, including tables, forms, and data visualization elements. On the other hand, Material Components Web provides a diverse set of components that are more generic and suitable for a wide range of applications, including buttons, cards, and menus.
Customization Control: Ant Design provides a high level of customization control to developers, allowing them to easily modify the appearance and behavior of components to suit their design requirements. Material Components Web, while offering some customization options, tends to have a more consistent and cohesive design language across its components, limiting the extent of customization available.
Integration with Frameworks: Ant Design has strong integration with React, providing pre-built components that work seamlessly with React applications, speeding up the development process. In comparison, Material Components Web has broader support for various front-end frameworks such as Angular, Vue.js, and React, allowing developers to use the components in their preferred framework.
Focus on Accessibility: Material Components Web puts a strong emphasis on accessibility by ensuring that components are designed and developed following accessibility best practices, making them usable for all users, including those with disabilities. Ant Design, while also considering accessibility in its design process, may not have the same level of focus on accessibility features as Material Components Web.
Community Support and Updates: Material Components Web benefits from being backed by Google, which ensures continuous support, updates, and improvements to the component library. Ant Design, on the other hand, relies heavily on its community for support and updates, which may lead to variations in the quality and timeliness of updates.

In Summary, Ant Design and Material Components Web differ in design philosophy, component library focus, customization control, integration with frameworks, accessibility emphasis, and community support and updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design	Material Components Web
An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.	It helps developers execute Material Design. Developed by a core team of engineers and UX designers at Google, these components enable a reliable development workflow to build beautiful and functional web projects.
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.	Modular; Customizable; Material Design UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars 96.5K	GitHub Stars 17.1K
GitHub Forks 53.9K	GitHub Forks 2.1K
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 12
Followers 1.7K	Followers 23
Votes 224	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 48 Lots of components 33 Polished and enterprisey look and feel 21 TypeScript 21 Easy to integrate 18 Es6 support Cons 24 Less 10 Large File Size 4 Poor accessibility support 3 Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React jQuery UI Bootstrap VueStrap	React Vue.js AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Material Components Web?

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Ant Design vs Material Components Web: What are the differences?

Design Philosophy: Ant Design follows a more traditional and corporate design style, focusing on providing a professional look and feel to the user interface. In contrast, Material Components Web follows Google's Material Design guidelines, emphasizing a more playful and interactive design approach with vibrant colors and animations.
Component Library: Ant Design offers a comprehensive library of user interface components specifically tailored for enterprise applications, including tables, forms, and data visualization elements. On the other hand, Material Components Web provides a diverse set of components that are more generic and suitable for a wide range of applications, including buttons, cards, and menus.
Customization Control: Ant Design provides a high level of customization control to developers, allowing them to easily modify the appearance and behavior of components to suit their design requirements. Material Components Web, while offering some customization options, tends to have a more consistent and cohesive design language across its components, limiting the extent of customization available.
Integration with Frameworks: Ant Design has strong integration with React, providing pre-built components that work seamlessly with React applications, speeding up the development process. In comparison, Material Components Web has broader support for various front-end frameworks such as Angular, Vue.js, and React, allowing developers to use the components in their preferred framework.
Focus on Accessibility: Material Components Web puts a strong emphasis on accessibility by ensuring that components are designed and developed following accessibility best practices, making them usable for all users, including those with disabilities. Ant Design, while also considering accessibility in its design process, may not have the same level of focus on accessibility features as Material Components Web.
Community Support and Updates: Material Components Web benefits from being backed by Google, which ensures continuous support, updates, and improvements to the component library. Ant Design, on the other hand, relies heavily on its community for support and updates, which may lead to variations in the quality and timeliness of updates.

Ant Design vs Material Components Web

Overview