Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AngularJS vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between AngularJS and Phoenix Framework. Both AngularJS and Phoenix Framework are popular web development frameworks, but they have different approaches and features.
Architecture: AngularJS is a client-side JavaScript framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture. It focuses on building dynamic Single-Page Applications (SPAs) by enhancing HTML with its directives and data binding. On the other hand, Phoenix Framework is a server-side framework built on the Elixir programming language. It follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture as well, but it primarily focuses on building scalable and high-performance web applications.
Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript as its primary language for development. It provides a wide range of features and libraries to enhance JavaScript development. In contrast, Phoenix Framework uses the Elixir programming language, which is built on top of the Erlang Virtual Machine. Elixir is a functional language that is known for its concurrency features and fault-tolerant nature. It provides a clean syntax and powerful tools for building scalable web applications.
Real-time capabilities: AngularJS provides real-time capabilities through the use of third-party libraries and technologies like WebSockets. It allows developers to build applications that can handle real-time data synchronization and communication between clients and servers. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, comes with built-in support for real-time features using a technology called Phoenix Channels. Phoenix Channels provide a scalable and fault-tolerant way to handle real-time data synchronization and communication.
Scalability: AngularJS is designed to build single-page applications that run entirely on the client-side. While it can handle large applications, its scalability depends on the client's browser capabilities and hardware. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, is built to handle high levels of concurrency and can scale horizontally by deploying multiple instances of the framework. It is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections and can handle millions of simultaneous users.
Error handling: AngularJS provides comprehensive error handling capabilities with its built-in error logging and debugging tools. It also has a robust community that provides support and guidance for fixing common errors. Phoenix Framework, being built on Elixir, provides powerful error handling features. Elixir's fault-tolerant nature allows the framework to gracefully handle errors and recover from them without crashing the entire application. It also provides tools for monitoring and diagnosing errors in production environments.
Learning curve and community support: AngularJS has a large and active community with extensive documentation and tutorials available. It has been around for a longer time and has a wide range of resources for learning and troubleshooting. Phoenix Framework, being relatively newer, has a smaller community compared to AngularJS. However, it is growing rapidly, and with the popularity of Elixir, it is gaining more recognition. Phoenix Framework also has a dedicated and supportive community that provides help and resources for learning and development.
In summary, AngularJS is a client-side JavaScript framework focusing on building dynamic SPAs, while Phoenix Framework is a server-side framework built on Elixir, focusing on scalability and high-performance web applications. AngularJS uses JavaScript, while Phoenix Framework uses Elixir. AngularJS relies on third-party libraries for real-time capabilities, while Phoenix Framework has built-in support for real-time features. AngularJS is scalable based on the client's hardware, while Phoenix Framework can scale horizontally. AngularJS provides robust error handling capabilities, while Phoenix Framework leverages Elixir's fault-tolerant nature. AngularJS has a larger community and more extensive resources, while Phoenix Framework is growing rapidly with a dedicated supportive community.
What is the best MVC stack to build mobile-friendly, light-weight, and fast single-page application with Spring Boot as back-end (Java)? Is Bootstrap still required to front-end layer these days?
The idea is to host on-premise initially with the potential to move to the cloud. Which combo would have minimal developer ramp-up time and low long-term maintenance costs (BAU support)?
React might be a good option if you're considering a mobile app for the future, because of react native. Although, Vue.js has the easiest learning curve and offers a better developer ramp-up time. Vue.js is great to build SPAs, very clean and organized and you won't have a lot of long-term maintenance problems (like AngularJS, for example). Bootstrap can still be used, but with flexbox there's no need anymore.
I recommend React because of less memory occupant compare to Angular, but this will depend on your organisation flexibility. When you use React you need to import different libraries as per your need. On the other side angular is a complete framework.
Performance-wise I vote for react js as it loads up quickly and lighter on the mobile. You can make good PWA with SSR as well.
If you are new to all three react will be a good choice considering, react-native will be useful if you want to build cross platform mobile application today or tomorrow. If you are talking about bootstrap styling framework than it's a choice you can style ur components by ur self or use bootstrap 4.0 framework. The complete stack mentioned above is platform agnostic u can run it anywhere you want be it cloud or on-premise.
It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.
It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.
Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.
I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.
Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.
I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.
Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:
- Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
- Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
- Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
- TypeScript as programming language
- Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
- ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
- Jest as testing framework
- Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
- NativeScript-Vue for mobile development
The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:
- Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
- Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
- Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
- Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
- Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
- Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
It is a complete waste of time and life to learn a different framework to solve the same problem (Both AngularJS and Angular build A+ UI's, but both require a lot of time to learn). It's dumb to spend 200 hours learning AngularJS, then 200 hours learning Angular when you could spend 200 hours learning AngularJS and 200 hours learning how to solve a different problem (like AI/ML, Data Science, AR/VR, Digital Marketing, etc.)
React has by far and away been our most important library choice throughout the history of Sellpy. It is a library that offers great flexibility supported by a really strong core. The React team is doing incredible work bringing quality features to the core project and tons of quality third party libraries fill in the gaps.
When first used Angular, the documentation was horrible and also the construct of Angular super academic and hard to learn (back in 2014). When evaluating React it was way easier getting stated even though its html in js (jsx) approach was very different. After some time we really started to like the co-location and component based model. If you architect well, you will have a component completely in one file including js/html/css.
We solely focus on one technology for frontend development. The reason for that is, that offering customers excellent services we need to be up to date on all developments of the framework but also its community and vast amount of packages. Reading blogs, newsletters, podcasts and so on. You will realistically only be able to be really good at one, so thats for us: React!
Pros of AngularJS
- Quick to develop889
- Great mvc589
- Powerful573
- Restful520
- Backed by google505
- Two-way data binding349
- Javascript343
- Open source329
- Dependency injection307
- Readable197
- Fast75
- Directives65
- Great community63
- Free57
- Extend html vocabulary38
- Components29
- Easy to test26
- Easy to learn25
- Easy to templates24
- Great documentation23
- Easy to start21
- Awesome19
- Light weight18
- Angular 2.015
- Efficient14
- Javascript mvw framework14
- Great extensions14
- Easy to prototype with11
- High performance9
- Coffeescript9
- Two-way binding8
- Lots of community modules8
- Mvc8
- Easy to e2e7
- Clean and keeps code readable7
- One of the best frameworks6
- Easy for small applications6
- Works great with jquery5
- Fast development5
- I do not touch DOM4
- The two-way Data Binding is awesome4
- Hierarchical Data Structure3
- Be a developer, not a plumber.3
- Declarative programming3
- Typescript3
- Dart3
- Community3
- Fkin awesome2
- Opinionated in the right areas2
- Supports api , easy development2
- Common Place2
- Very very useful and fast framework for development2
- Linear learning curve2
- Great2
- Amazing community support2
- Readable code2
- Programming fun again2
- The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes2
- Scopes2
- Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest2
- Fk react, all my homies hate react1
Pros of Phoenix Framework
- High performance120
- Super fast76
- Rapid development70
- Open source62
- Erlang VM60
- Well designed46
- Channels45
- Easily Scalable39
- Very extensible35
- Restful35
- Functional Programming11
- Inspired by Rails10
- Great community10
- Beautiful code8
- Ecto8
- Scalable6
- Fault tolerant6
- LiveView feature5
- Elegant4
- Insanely fast and easy4
- Feels like working with rails framework with more power4
- Built-in websocket support3
- Benevolent dictator that decides project course3
- Great integration with GraphQL3
- 2
- Front-End Agnostic2
- Functional approach1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AngularJS
- Complex12
- Event Listener Overload3
- Dependency injection3
- Hard to learn2
- Learning Curve2
Cons of Phoenix Framework
- No jobs6
- Very difficult5
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AngularJS?
What is Phoenix Framework?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Phoenix Framework?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AngularJS?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+8+8
+8
+22
+39+26+25