AngularJS vs Phalcon

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

AngularJS vs Phalcon: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing AngularJS and Phalcon, it's essential to understand the key differences that set these two frameworks apart in web development.

Architecture: AngularJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, where the controller handles user input and updates the model and view accordingly. On the other hand, Phalcon follows the HMVC (Hierarchical Model-View-Controller) architecture, which allows more modular and reusable code organization by breaking the application into smaller modules.
Performance: Phalcon is known for its impressive performance due to its C-extension architecture, which is written in C and C++ for faster execution. AngularJS, while powerful, can experience performance issues with larger applications as it is entirely JavaScript-based.
Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Phalcon due to its complex concepts such as dependency injection, scope, and directives. Phalcon, with its simpler and more straightforward design, makes it easier for developers to grasp and implement.
Flexibility: AngularJS is more flexible and allows developers to create single-page applications with dynamic content rendering. Phalcon, being a PHP framework, provides flexibility in terms of working with different databases and integrating various PHP tools and libraries.
Community Support: AngularJS has a vast community with a plethora of resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. Phalcon, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community compared to AngularJS, resulting in fewer resources and community support for troubleshooting and development help.

In Summary, AngularJS and Phalcon differ in architecture, performance, learning curve, flexibility, and community support, making them distinct choices for web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Phalcon

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Phalcon
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 10.8K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 2.0K
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 246
Followers 44.5K	Followers 294
Votes 5.3K	Votes 354
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Hard to learn 2 Learning Curve	Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation
Integrations
JavaScript	PHP

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Phalcon?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

AngularJS vs Phalcon: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing AngularJS and Phalcon, it's essential to understand the key differences that set these two frameworks apart in web development.

Architecture: AngularJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, where the controller handles user input and updates the model and view accordingly. On the other hand, Phalcon follows the HMVC (Hierarchical Model-View-Controller) architecture, which allows more modular and reusable code organization by breaking the application into smaller modules.
Performance: Phalcon is known for its impressive performance due to its C-extension architecture, which is written in C and C++ for faster execution. AngularJS, while powerful, can experience performance issues with larger applications as it is entirely JavaScript-based.
Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Phalcon due to its complex concepts such as dependency injection, scope, and directives. Phalcon, with its simpler and more straightforward design, makes it easier for developers to grasp and implement.
Flexibility: AngularJS is more flexible and allows developers to create single-page applications with dynamic content rendering. Phalcon, being a PHP framework, provides flexibility in terms of working with different databases and integrating various PHP tools and libraries.
Community Support: AngularJS has a vast community with a plethora of resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. Phalcon, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community compared to AngularJS, resulting in fewer resources and community support for troubleshooting and development help.

In Summary, AngularJS and Phalcon differ in architecture, performance, learning curve, flexibility, and community support, making them distinct choices for web development projects.