AngularJS vs Mustache

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Mustache

Stacks2.4K

Followers415

Votes50

GitHub Stars16.7K

Forks2.4K

AngularJS vs Mustache: What are the differences?

Data Binding: AngularJS provides two-way data binding, meaning any changes made in the model are reflected in the view and vice versa. On the other hand, Mustache only supports one-way data binding, where data flows in one direction from the model to the view.
Functionality: AngularJS is a full-fledged MVC framework that includes features like dependency injection, routing, and form validation. Mustache, on the other hand, is a simple template system that focuses solely on rendering data without any logic or functionality.
Customization: AngularJS allows developers to create custom directives, filters, and services to extend the framework's functionality. In contrast, Mustache templates are static and limited in terms of customization, as they do not support custom logic or functions.
Syntax: AngularJS uses HTML attributes like ng-model, ng-bind, and ng-repeat to annotate the DOM and add dynamic behavior. Mustache uses {{ }} syntax to insert variables and perform simple logic, making it easier to understand and use for beginners.
Dependency: AngularJS has a larger footprint and requires more resources compared to Mustache, which is lightweight and ideal for simple rendering of data without additional dependencies. Mustache is typically used in scenarios where minimal rendering capabilities are needed.
Updates: AngularJS has regular updates and a supportive community that provides bug fixes, new features, and security patches. Mustache, being a simpler and static template system, has fewer updates and improvements over time, making it more suitable for stable and straightforward projects.

In Summary, AngularJS and Mustache differ in terms of data binding, functionality, customization, syntax, dependencies, and updates, catering to different development needs and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Mustache

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Mustache
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 16.7K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 2.4K
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 2.4K
Followers 44.5K	Followers 415
Votes 5.3K	Votes 50
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Hard to learn 2 Learning Curve	Pros 29 Dead simple templating 12 Open source 8 Small 1 Support in lots of languages
Integrations
JavaScript	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Mustache?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Mustache: What are the differences?

Data Binding: AngularJS provides two-way data binding, meaning any changes made in the model are reflected in the view and vice versa. On the other hand, Mustache only supports one-way data binding, where data flows in one direction from the model to the view.
Functionality: AngularJS is a full-fledged MVC framework that includes features like dependency injection, routing, and form validation. Mustache, on the other hand, is a simple template system that focuses solely on rendering data without any logic or functionality.
Customization: AngularJS allows developers to create custom directives, filters, and services to extend the framework's functionality. In contrast, Mustache templates are static and limited in terms of customization, as they do not support custom logic or functions.
Syntax: AngularJS uses HTML attributes like ng-model, ng-bind, and ng-repeat to annotate the DOM and add dynamic behavior. Mustache uses {{ }} syntax to insert variables and perform simple logic, making it easier to understand and use for beginners.
Dependency: AngularJS has a larger footprint and requires more resources compared to Mustache, which is lightweight and ideal for simple rendering of data without additional dependencies. Mustache is typically used in scenarios where minimal rendering capabilities are needed.
Updates: AngularJS has regular updates and a supportive community that provides bug fixes, new features, and security patches. Mustache, being a simpler and static template system, has fewer updates and improvements over time, making it more suitable for stable and straightforward projects.

In Summary, AngularJS and Mustache differ in terms of data binding, functionality, customization, syntax, dependencies, and updates, catering to different development needs and project requirements.

AngularJS vs Mustache

Overview