AngularJS vs Marko

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Marko

Stacks29

Followers49

Votes40

GitHub Stars13.9K

Forks656

AngularJS vs Marko: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing AngularJS and Marko, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two front-end technologies.

Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript as its programming language, whereas Marko uses its own language called Marko syntax. This difference in languages can impact the development process and the learning curve for developers when working with these technologies.
Framework vs Library: AngularJS is a full-fledged framework that provides a wide range of features and tools for developing complex web applications. On the other hand, Marko is more of a lightweight and efficient UI library focused on rendering performance. This distinction in the scope of functionality can affect the choice of technology based on project requirements.
Two-Way Data Binding: AngularJS is known for its two-way data binding feature, which automatically synchronizes the data between the UI and the model. Marko, however, does not natively support two-way data binding, requiring developers to implement this functionality manually if needed. This difference can impact how data is managed and updated in the application.
Virtual DOM: Marko utilizes a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render changes in the UI, resulting in improved performance and responsiveness. In contrast, AngularJS does not have a built-in virtual DOM, which can impact rendering efficiency for complex applications with frequent updates. This difference in rendering approach can influence the overall performance of the application.
Community Support: AngularJS has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, resources, and community-driven plugins and tools. Marko, being a relatively newer technology, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources available. This variance in community support can affect the availability of help and resources for developers working with these technologies.

In Summary, understanding the differences between AngularJS and Marko in terms of language, framework/library distinction, data binding, rendering approach, and community support is crucial for making informed decisions on which technology to use for front-end development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Marko

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Marko
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.
-	Extremely fast; Streaming and async rendering; Progressive HTML rendering; Custom tags; Compiles to readable CommonJS modules; Server-side and client-side rendering; Use Marko with any web framework, including: Express, Koa, Hapi; Syntax highlighting in popular editors and IDEs
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 13.9K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 656
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 29
Followers 44.5K	Followers 49
Votes 5.3K	Votes 40
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Hard to learn 2 Learning Curve	Pros 6 Simplicity 5 No JSX 5 Speed 5 Better than React, Vue, etc 4 Performance Cons 1 Extensibility 1 Mobile native 1 Unit test
Integrations
JavaScript	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Marko?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Marko: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing AngularJS and Marko, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two front-end technologies.

Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript as its programming language, whereas Marko uses its own language called Marko syntax. This difference in languages can impact the development process and the learning curve for developers when working with these technologies.
Framework vs Library: AngularJS is a full-fledged framework that provides a wide range of features and tools for developing complex web applications. On the other hand, Marko is more of a lightweight and efficient UI library focused on rendering performance. This distinction in the scope of functionality can affect the choice of technology based on project requirements.
Two-Way Data Binding: AngularJS is known for its two-way data binding feature, which automatically synchronizes the data between the UI and the model. Marko, however, does not natively support two-way data binding, requiring developers to implement this functionality manually if needed. This difference can impact how data is managed and updated in the application.
Virtual DOM: Marko utilizes a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render changes in the UI, resulting in improved performance and responsiveness. In contrast, AngularJS does not have a built-in virtual DOM, which can impact rendering efficiency for complex applications with frequent updates. This difference in rendering approach can influence the overall performance of the application.
Community Support: AngularJS has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, resources, and community-driven plugins and tools. Marko, being a relatively newer technology, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources available. This variance in community support can affect the availability of help and resources for developers working with these technologies.

AngularJS vs Marko

Overview