AngularJS vs Fusion.js

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Fusion.js

Stacks2

Followers18

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.6K

Forks137

AngularJS vs Fusion.js: What are the differences?

Architecture: AngularJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, while Fusion.js utilizes the component-based architecture. This difference affects how developers structure their applications and manage data flow within the framework.
Language: AngularJS is based on JavaScript, while Fusion.js is built using TypeScript. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that offers static typing, which can help catch errors during development and enhance code maintainability.
Community Support: AngularJS has a larger community with extensive documentation and resources available online. On the other hand, Fusion.js is relatively newer and may not have as vast a community support system as AngularJS.
Performance: Fusion.js is known for its better performance optimization compared to AngularJS. Fusion.js has a server-side rendering capability that can enhance loading speed and improve SEO, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
Flexibility: AngularJS is considered more opinionated and prescriptive, providing a structured approach to development. Fusion.js, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to tailor their applications according to specific requirements.
Scalability: Fusion.js is designed with scalability in mind, providing features like code splitting and lazy loading that can help manage larger codebases and improve performance as the application grows. AngularJS, while scalable, may face challenges in handling complex applications efficiently.

In Summary, AngularJS and Fusion.js differ in architecture, language, community support, performance, flexibility, and scalability, offering developers distinct options based on their project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Fusion.js

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Fusion.js
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	It is a modular javascript framework for creating plugin-based React applications. It gives you the developer experience you expect from a React/Redux setup and provides tools to take project quality to the next level.
-	Plugin-based architecture and DI system for maintainability; Out-of-the-box support for server-rendering of React components, bundle splitting and hot module reloading
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 1.6K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 137
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 2
Followers 44.5K	Followers 18
Votes 5.3K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	React

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Fusion.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Fusion.js: What are the differences?

Architecture: AngularJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, while Fusion.js utilizes the component-based architecture. This difference affects how developers structure their applications and manage data flow within the framework.
Language: AngularJS is based on JavaScript, while Fusion.js is built using TypeScript. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that offers static typing, which can help catch errors during development and enhance code maintainability.
Community Support: AngularJS has a larger community with extensive documentation and resources available online. On the other hand, Fusion.js is relatively newer and may not have as vast a community support system as AngularJS.
Performance: Fusion.js is known for its better performance optimization compared to AngularJS. Fusion.js has a server-side rendering capability that can enhance loading speed and improve SEO, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
Flexibility: AngularJS is considered more opinionated and prescriptive, providing a structured approach to development. Fusion.js, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to tailor their applications according to specific requirements.
Scalability: Fusion.js is designed with scalability in mind, providing features like code splitting and lazy loading that can help manage larger codebases and improve performance as the application grows. AngularJS, while scalable, may face challenges in handling complex applications efficiently.

AngularJS vs Fusion.js

Overview