StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. AngularJS vs Flask

AngularJS vs Flask

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
AngularJS
AngularJS
Stacks61.5K
Followers44.5K
Votes5.3K
GitHub Stars59.0K
Forks27.3K

AngularJS vs Flask: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AngularJS and Flask are both popular frameworks used for web development. AngularJS is a front-end JavaScript framework, while Flask is a back-end Python framework. Although they are used for web development, they have different features and purposes.

  1. Architecture and Language: One key difference between AngularJS and Flask is their architecture and the language they are built on. AngularJS is a full-fledged front-end framework that uses JavaScript as its primary language. It follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture and provides a complete solution for building dynamic web applications. On the other hand, Flask is a micro web framework that uses Python as its primary language. It follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern but is more lightweight and minimalistic, giving developers more flexibility in building web applications.

  2. Development Approach: Another difference between AngularJS and Flask is their development approach. AngularJS follows a declarative approach, where developers define what they want the application to do, and AngularJS takes care of the implementation details. It provides a set of declarative directives that allow developers to define the behavior of different elements in the application. Flask, on the other hand, follows an imperative approach, where developers have more control over the implementation details. Developers need to write explicit code to handle different aspects of the application.

  3. Client-side vs Server-side Rendering: AngularJS is a client-side rendering framework, which means that the HTML templates are rendered on the client-side by the browser. This allows for more interactivity and a smoother user experience. Flask, on the other hand, is a server-side rendering framework, where the HTML templates are rendered on the server and then sent to the client. This approach is more suitable for applications that don't require a lot of interactivity and are more focused on delivering content.

  4. Dependencies and Ecosystem: AngularJS has a rich ecosystem and a wide range of built-in features and libraries. It provides a set of core modules and allows developers to easily add external modules to extend its functionality. Flask, on the other hand, has a smaller ecosystem and fewer built-in features. It is more lightweight and allows developers to choose and add only the necessary dependencies, resulting in a more efficient and optimized application.

  5. Learning Curve and Complexity: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Flask due to its extensive features and complex concepts like data binding, directives, and dependency injection. It requires a solid understanding of JavaScript and a good grasp of object-oriented programming concepts. Flask, being a lightweight framework, has a relatively lower learning curve and is easier to get started with, especially for developers with a background in Python.

  6. Scalability and Performance: AngularJS is designed to handle large-scale applications with complex features and high interactivity. It provides features like two-way data binding and dependency injection, which make it easier to manage complex application states. Flask, on the other hand, is more suitable for smaller or medium-sized applications where performance is a primary concern. Its lightweight nature and simplicity allow for faster response times and better performance overall.

In summary, AngularJS is a full-fledged front-end framework built on JavaScript with a declarative approach, client-side rendering, rich ecosystem, steeper learning curve, and better scalability. Flask is a lightweight back-end framework built on Python with an imperative approach, server-side rendering, smaller ecosystem, lower learning curve, and better performance for smaller applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, AngularJS

Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
John Clifford
John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k
Comments
José
José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
AngularJS
AngularJS

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
59.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
27.3K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
61.5K
Followers
16.2K
Followers
44.5K
Votes
60
Votes
5.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 889
    Quick to develop
  • 589
    Great mvc
  • 573
    Powerful
  • 520
    Restful
  • 505
    Backed by google
Cons
  • 12
    Complex
  • 4
    Dependency injection
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Flask, AngularJS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase