AngularJS vs Dust

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Dust

Stacks11

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks123

AngularJS vs Dust: What are the differences?

Introduction

AngularJS and Dust are both popular JavaScript frameworks that are used for building web applications. While they have some similarities, there are also several key differences between the two.

Language and Syntax: One of the main differences between AngularJS and Dust is the language and syntax they use. AngularJS is written in JavaScript and uses a declarative syntax, making it easier to read and understand. On the other hand, Dust uses a template language that is similar to HTML but includes additional features for dynamic content rendering.
Data Binding: Another important difference between AngularJS and Dust is the way they handle data binding. AngularJS has a two-way data binding mechanism, which means that changes to the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. Dust, on the other hand, only supports one-way data binding, where changes in the model are not automatically reflected in the view.
Performance: When it comes to performance, AngularJS and Dust have different approaches. AngularJS is known for its robust framework and can handle complex applications efficiently. Dust, on the other hand, is designed for faster rendering and is particularly suited for applications with large amounts of data that need to be rendered quickly.
Modularity and Extensibility: AngularJS offers a modular architecture that allows developers to create reusable components and services. It also provides a wide range of built-in features and libraries that can be easily extended. Dust, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that focuses on simplicity and does not provide as many built-in features or extensibility options.
Community and Ecosystem: AngularJS has a large and active community of developers, which means that there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries available for developers to use. Dust, on the other hand, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources and libraries available.
Learning Curve: Learning AngularJS can be more challenging than learning Dust, especially for beginners. AngularJS has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and more complex architecture. Dust, on the other hand, is relatively easy to learn and understand, making it a good choice for developers who are new to web development.

In summary, AngularJS is a powerful and feature-rich framework that offers a robust architecture and extensive community support. Dust, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework with a focus on simplicity and fast rendering. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the level of complexity involved.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Dust

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Dust
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 1.4K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 123
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 11
Followers 44.5K	Followers 19
Votes 5.3K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	Node.js

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Dust?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Dust: What are the differences?

Introduction

AngularJS and Dust are both popular JavaScript frameworks that are used for building web applications. While they have some similarities, there are also several key differences between the two.

Language and Syntax: One of the main differences between AngularJS and Dust is the language and syntax they use. AngularJS is written in JavaScript and uses a declarative syntax, making it easier to read and understand. On the other hand, Dust uses a template language that is similar to HTML but includes additional features for dynamic content rendering.
Data Binding: Another important difference between AngularJS and Dust is the way they handle data binding. AngularJS has a two-way data binding mechanism, which means that changes to the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. Dust, on the other hand, only supports one-way data binding, where changes in the model are not automatically reflected in the view.
Performance: When it comes to performance, AngularJS and Dust have different approaches. AngularJS is known for its robust framework and can handle complex applications efficiently. Dust, on the other hand, is designed for faster rendering and is particularly suited for applications with large amounts of data that need to be rendered quickly.
Modularity and Extensibility: AngularJS offers a modular architecture that allows developers to create reusable components and services. It also provides a wide range of built-in features and libraries that can be easily extended. Dust, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that focuses on simplicity and does not provide as many built-in features or extensibility options.
Community and Ecosystem: AngularJS has a large and active community of developers, which means that there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries available for developers to use. Dust, on the other hand, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources and libraries available.
Learning Curve: Learning AngularJS can be more challenging than learning Dust, especially for beginners. AngularJS has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and more complex architecture. Dust, on the other hand, is relatively easy to learn and understand, making it a good choice for developers who are new to web development.

AngularJS vs Dust

Overview

AngularJS vs Dust: What are the differences?