StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Angular 2 vs Meteor

Angular 2 vs Meteor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K
Angular
Angular
Stacks3.8K
Followers4.8K
Votes499
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular 2 vs Meteor: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Angular 2 and Meteor

**1. Architecture**: Angular 2 is a front-end framework that follows the component-based architecture, allowing developers to build complex UI structures using reusable components. On the other hand, Meteor is a full-stack platform that includes both front-end and back-end functionality, offering a more integrated approach to development.

**2. Language**: Angular 2 is based on TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing and other advanced features. Meteor, on the other hand, primarily uses JavaScript but also allows developers to use other languages like TypeScript and CoffeeScript.

**3. Data Management**: Angular 2 relies on services and observables for managing data within the application, providing a reactive approach to data handling. In contrast, Meteor includes a real-time data synchronization feature out of the box, making it easier to build applications that update in real-time.

**4. Community Support**: Angular 2 has a large and active community of developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries. Meteor also has a dedicated community, but it may not be as extensive as Angular 2's community.

**5. Learning Curve**: Angular 2 has a steeper learning curve due to its complex architecture and the use of TypeScript. Meteor, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it more beginner-friendly.

**6. Scalability**: Angular 2 is more suitable for large-scale, complex applications due to its modular architecture and extensive tooling support. Meteor, while capable of handling large applications, may face scalability issues as the application grows in size.

In Summary, Angular 2 and Meteor differ in their architecture, language support, data management approach, community support, learning curve, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Meteor, Angular

Dennis
Dennis

CTO at Prepaid-Hoster

May 17, 2020

Decided

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

181k views181k
Comments
Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Fortinet

Oct 16, 2019

Decided

When deciding on a front end framework to build my bitcoin faucet project, I knew I needed something battle hardened, dependedable, but also feature filled and ready to go out of the box.

While I've written some smaller apps with ng2+, I've never gone full tilt with it so I knew there were still some things to learn, and most importantly: how to do them properly, such as proper component architecture and breaking old habbits from ng1.

I didn't opt for React in this case, simply due to the need to stack more and more things on top of it to do what I'd need it to do. I wanted a framework that was going to take over routing and execution of complex UI controls, and keep items outside of a component's scope updated and react to events. This framework needed a comprehensive event emission system, data acquisition and handling, bi-directional data binding, state, and a series of things that you'd need to install separately for React to match up to what's already in the box with Angular.

I opted to stick to Angular instead of Vue for the fact that Angular also already has it's entire build system ready to go and comprehensivly built to deliver the tiniest version of it's deliverable. I was hosting this thing in a google cloud instance, so I needed to make sure the app stayed as small as possible, and could automatically trim out the cruft. This is where Angular's built in Tree Shaking took precedence for me.

Vue is more than capable of handling everything I'd need, and it was something I took serious considerion of. For instance, Vue poweres Cointiply, another bitcoin faucet application that's highly reactive and high componentized just like I wanted.

But I'd still need to learn Vue, I'd still need to configure it's build system, and I still wanted to use SCSS and TypeScript.

So Angular it was. ng8 is a great platform for building very complex user interfaces, and has many of the problems you'd inevitably face integrating a user interface to an application already figured out, and complete with a best practice recommendation.

React and Vue, given enough time and energy, are super capable platforms. No one can deny that. Angular's "A-Z Batteries Included" approach to the whole development process is what made it especially enticing this time.

55.4k views55.4k
Comments
Carl-Erik
Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor
Meteor
Angular
Angular

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
Progressive Web Apps; Native; Code Generation; Code Splitting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
3.8K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
4.8K
Votes
1.7K
Votes
499
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
Pros
  • 109
    It's a powerful framework
  • 53
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 48
    TypeScript
  • 45
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 40
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
Cons
  • 9
    Large overhead in file size and initialization time
  • 9
    Overcomplicated
  • 2
    Ugly code
  • 2
    CLI not open to other test and linting tools
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Firebase
Firebase
Sentry
Sentry
Socket.IO
Socket.IO

What are some alternatives to Meteor, Angular?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot