Home
Application and Data
Languages & Frameworks
Front-End Frameworks

Angular Universal vs Materialize

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Angular Universal
332
412
+ 1
36
Materialize
690
1.2K
+ 1
557
Add tool

Angular Universal vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Developers describe Angular Universal as "A technology that renders Angular applications on the server". It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive. On the other hand, Materialize is detailed as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design.

Angular Universal and Materialize are primarily classified as "JavaScript Framework Components" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.

Angular Universal and Materialize are both open source tools. Angular Universal with 50.1K GitHub stars and 13.9K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Materialize with 36.2K GitHub stars and 4.83K GitHub forks.

The3ballsoft, GeoLytix, and Avhana Health are some of the popular companies that use Materialize, whereas Angular Universal is used by Garlic Tech Ltd, Simian, and IVALO. Materialize has a broader approval, being mentioned in 63 company stacks & 378 developers stacks; compared to Angular Universal, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Angular Universal
Pros of Materialize
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 4
    Static site generator
  • 4
    Dynamic rendering
  • 4
    Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    SEO
  • 1
    Well documented
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
  • 42
    Good documentation
  • 37
    Code examples
  • 29
    Extremely light - 29kb
  • 28
    Flexible
  • 15
    Great Support
  • 10
    It looks beautiful
  • 8
    Very nice looking components to quickly build out
  • 7
    Smooth animation
  • 6
    Great Grid System
  • 4
    Great
  • 4
    Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat
  • 3
    Angular2 Support
  • 2
    MIT Lisence
  • 2
    Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    React
  • 1
    Grid system
  • 1
    Because of the easy to use and very editable library
  • 1
    Responsivness
  • 1
    Jibberish
  • 1
    Friendly Api
  • 0
    Better class name
  • 0
    Rtl support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Angular Universal
Cons of Materialize
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 7
      Mobile errors
    • 6
      Poor Grid System
    • 2
      Unmaintained

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Angular Universal?

    It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

    What is Materialize?

    A CSS Framework based on material design.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Angular Universal?
    What companies use Materialize?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Angular Universal?
    What tools integrate with Materialize?
    What are some alternatives to Angular Universal and Materialize?
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Next.js
    Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
    Nuxt.js
    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Python
    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
    See all alternatives

    Related Comparisons

    Bootstrap vs Foundation vs MaterializeBootstrap vs Material Design for Angular vs MaterializeMaterial-UI vs MaterializeBootstrap vs Materialize vs Semantic UIBootstrap vs Material Design Lite vs Materialize

    Trending Comparisons

    Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

    Top Comparisons

    HipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabPostman vs Swagger UIBootstrap vs Materialize