Angular Material vs Material-UI

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Angular Material

Stacks624

Followers755

Votes32

GitHub Stars24.9K

Forks6.8K

Angular Material vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Angular Material and Material-UI are both popular libraries for implementing Material Design components in web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Software Stack Integration: Angular Material is specifically designed for use with the Angular framework, providing seamless integration and compatibility. On the other hand, Material-UI is a React component library, built specifically for React applications. This means that Angular Material may be a better choice for developers working with Angular, while Material-UI is ideal for React developers.
Component Customization: Angular Material offers a wide range of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify and adapt components to fit their specific application requirements. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides a highly customizable set of components, enabling developers to tailor them to their needs using CSS-in-JS or accessing the underlying styles directly.
Component Availability: Angular Material offers a comprehensive set of Material Design components, including form controls, navigation elements, and overlays. It also provides out-of-the-box support for accessibility features. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides a vast library of components that extend beyond the scope of Material Design, including data grids, charts, and icons.
Documentation and Community: Angular Material benefits from being a part of the Angular ecosystem, which boasts a large and active community. This means that developers can easily find relevant resources, tutorials, and community support for Angular Material. Material-UI, while also having a large community, may have a more focused community of React developers.
Styling Approach: Angular Material follows a uniform design language, adhering closely to the principles of Material Design. This ensures a consistent and cohesive user experience across different applications. Material-UI takes a more flexible approach, allowing developers to choose from different design systems, such as Material Design, Fluent UI, or their own custom style.
Performance Considerations: Angular Material has been optimized for performance within the Angular framework, leveraging features like change detection and zone.js. Material-UI, being a React library, leverages virtual DOM and has its own optimizations for performance.

In summary, Angular Material is tightly integrated with Angular, offers extensive customization options, and has a comprehensive set of Material Design components. Material-UI, on the other hand, is ideal for React developers, provides a wide range of components beyond Material Design, and offers greater flexibility in terms of styling and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Angular Material

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Angular Material
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Easy to use ; comprehensive & modern UI components ; UI components work across the web, mobile and desktop; material styled angular apps fast and easy
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.8K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 624
Followers 3.7K	Followers 755
Votes 445	Votes 32
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 Extra library needed for date/time pickers	Pros 12 Components 8 Backed by a well known company 4 Simple 3 Easy 2 Very good documentation Cons 4 Fairly large 2 Suck 2 Look like 90s stuffs 2 Shit
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	Angular CLI Angular

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Angular Material ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Angular Material vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Angular Material and Material-UI are both popular libraries for implementing Material Design components in web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Software Stack Integration: Angular Material is specifically designed for use with the Angular framework, providing seamless integration and compatibility. On the other hand, Material-UI is a React component library, built specifically for React applications. This means that Angular Material may be a better choice for developers working with Angular, while Material-UI is ideal for React developers.
Component Customization: Angular Material offers a wide range of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify and adapt components to fit their specific application requirements. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides a highly customizable set of components, enabling developers to tailor them to their needs using CSS-in-JS or accessing the underlying styles directly.
Component Availability: Angular Material offers a comprehensive set of Material Design components, including form controls, navigation elements, and overlays. It also provides out-of-the-box support for accessibility features. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides a vast library of components that extend beyond the scope of Material Design, including data grids, charts, and icons.
Documentation and Community: Angular Material benefits from being a part of the Angular ecosystem, which boasts a large and active community. This means that developers can easily find relevant resources, tutorials, and community support for Angular Material. Material-UI, while also having a large community, may have a more focused community of React developers.
Styling Approach: Angular Material follows a uniform design language, adhering closely to the principles of Material Design. This ensures a consistent and cohesive user experience across different applications. Material-UI takes a more flexible approach, allowing developers to choose from different design systems, such as Material Design, Fluent UI, or their own custom style.
Performance Considerations: Angular Material has been optimized for performance within the Angular framework, leveraging features like change detection and zone.js. Material-UI, being a React library, leverages virtual DOM and has its own optimizations for performance.

Angular Material vs Material-UI

Overview