StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Angular Material vs Kendo UI

Angular Material vs Kendo UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
Angular Material
Angular Material
Stacks624
Followers755
Votes32
GitHub Stars24.9K
Forks6.8K

Angular Material vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Angular Material and Kendo UI are two popular frameworks used for building user interfaces in web applications. Both frameworks provide a set of UI components and tools that can enhance the look and feel of web applications. However, there are several key differences between Angular Material and Kendo UI.

  1. Design Philosophy: Angular Material follows the Material Design principles, which focus on creating a visually appealing and interactive user interface. On the other hand, Kendo UI offers a more traditional and customizable UI design.

  2. Integration with Angular: Angular Material is specifically designed for use with Angular, which means it integrates seamlessly with Angular projects and provides a cohesive development experience. Kendo UI, on the other hand, can be used with different JavaScript frameworks, including Angular, but may require additional configuration and setup.

  3. Component Availability: Angular Material provides a comprehensive set of UI components out-of-the-box, including buttons, cards, forms, and navigation components. Kendo UI offers a wider range of UI components, including data grids, charts, and visualization tools, which makes it suitable for more complex and data-intensive applications.

  4. Customization and Theming: Angular Material provides a built-in theming system that allows developers to easily customize the appearance of UI components to match their application's brand and style. Kendo UI also offers theming capabilities but requires more effort and expertise to achieve a fully customized design.

  5. License and Pricing: Angular Material is an open-source framework licensed under the MIT license, which means it is free to use and modify. Kendo UI, on the other hand, is a commercial framework that requires a license for commercial use. It offers both a free trial version and commercial licenses with different pricing options.

  6. Community and Support: Angular Material benefits from a large and active community of developers due to its close association with the Angular ecosystem. It has extensive documentation, online resources, and community support. Kendo UI also has a dedicated community and provides documentation and support, but may have a smaller community compared to Angular Material.

In summary, Angular Material and Kendo UI differ in their design philosophy, integration with Angular, component availability, customization and theming capabilities, licensing and pricing, as well as community and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Angular Material
Angular Material

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Easy to use ; comprehensive & modern UI components ; UI components work across the web, mobile and desktop; material styled angular apps fast and easy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
24.9K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
6.8K
Stacks
297
Stacks
624
Followers
359
Followers
755
Votes
33
Votes
32
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    Built-in router
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
Pros
  • 12
    Components
  • 8
    Backed by a well known company
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Rte
Cons
  • 4
    Fairly large
  • 2
    Suck
  • 2
    Shit
  • 2
    Look like 90s stuffs
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, Angular Material ?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase