StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Android SDK vs Material Design for Angular

Android SDK vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

Android SDK vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Introduction

The Android SDK and Material Design for Angular are two popular tools used for developing user interfaces in mobile and web applications. Despite having some similarities, they have significant differences in terms of functionality and implementation.

  1. Framework Compatibility: Android SDK is specifically designed for building native Android applications, while Material Design for Angular focuses on creating web applications using Angular framework. This difference in compatibility makes it essential for developers to choose the appropriate tool based on the platform they are targeting.

  2. Component Library: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of pre-built UI components that adhere to Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing interfaces. In contrast, the Android SDK offers a more customizable but less structured approach to building UI elements, requiring developers to create components from scratch.

  3. Theming and Styling: Material Design for Angular offers a built-in theming system that allows developers to easily customize the appearance of their applications using predefined color palettes and typography. On the other hand, Android SDK provides basic theming capabilities but requires more manual configuration and styling to achieve a cohesive design across the app.

  4. Platform-specific Features: Android SDK provides access to a wide range of platform-specific features and APIs that are essential for creating Android applications with advanced functionalities such as camera access, location services, and push notifications. In contrast, Material Design for Angular focuses more on the presentation layer and may require additional plugins or external libraries to access platform-specific features.

  5. Development Environment: Android SDK is typically used with IDEs like Android Studio, which offer robust features for debugging, profiling, and testing Android applications. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, can be integrated into popular web development tools like Visual Studio Code, providing a different set of tools and workflows for web application development.

  6. Community and Support: The Android SDK benefits from a large and active developer community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. Material Design for Angular also has a strong community backing, with regular updates and contributions from Google and the Angular team, ensuring ongoing support and updates for developers.

In Summary, the Android SDK and Material Design for Angular differ in terms of framework compatibility, component library, theming and styling, platform-specific features, development environment, and community support, making each tool suitable for different use cases and development requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, Material Design for Angular

Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
20.7K
Followers
9.6K
Votes
800
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
Java
Java
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, Material Design for Angular?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase