Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ampersand.js vs Ember.js: What are the differences?
Developers describe Ampersand.js as "A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps". We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules. On the other hand, Ember.js is detailed as "A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps". Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; Ember.js does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
Ampersand.js and Ember.js belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider Ampersand.js over the competitors, whereas "Elegant" was stated as the key factor in picking Ember.js.
Ampersand.js and Ember.js are both open source tools. Ember.js with 21.1K GitHub stars and 4.17K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Ampersand.js with 818 GitHub stars and 52 GitHub forks.
Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?
With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.
Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/
Pros of Ampersand.js
- Open source5
- Micromodules4
- CommonJS3
- npm3
- Loosely Coupled3
- non-frameworky2
- Integrates well with anything2
- Great Community2
- Powerful2
- Free2
- Simple2
- JavaScript1
Pros of Ember.js
- Elegant126
- Quick to develop97
- Great mvc83
- Great community82
- Great router73
- Values conventions, there is one-true way to organize52
- Open source50
- Components44
- Mvc framework34
- Handlebars.js28
- Htmlbars13
- Yehuda katz11
- Tom dale10
- Great logo10
- It's NOT Google or Facebook6
- manages large data sets on the front end easily5
- Convention over Configuration5
- Glimmer: react-like rendering engine5
- Organized4
- Fast4
- Enterprise4
- Intelligent4
- It rocks4
- Good docs3
- Fastest spinning circles3
- IE8 support3
- Easy and Quick to develop2
- Documentation is finally active and updated2
- Flexibility1
- Business wins1
- Comprehensive1
- Great for big apps/many devs because its organized1
- Growing community1
- For building ambitious Web apps1
- Dependency Injection1
- Stability without stagnation1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ampersand.js
Cons of Ember.js
- Very little flexibility2
- Too much convention, too little configuration2
- Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps1
- Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful1