Ampersand.js vs Ember.js: What are the differences?
Developers describe Ampersand.js as "A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps". We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules. On the other hand, Ember.js is detailed as "A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps". Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; Ember.js does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
Ampersand.js and Ember.js belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider Ampersand.js over the competitors, whereas "Elegant" was stated as the key factor in picking Ember.js.
Ampersand.js and Ember.js are both open source tools. Ember.js with 21.1K GitHub stars and 4.17K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Ampersand.js with 818 GitHub stars and 52 GitHub forks.