StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Amazon Redshift Spectrum vs Azure Synapse

Amazon Redshift Spectrum vs Azure Synapse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Stacks99
Followers147
Votes3
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Amazon Redshift Spectrum vs Azure Synapse: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon Redshift Spectrum and Azure Synapse are both cloud-based data warehousing solutions that provide high-performance and scalable analytics capabilities. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that are worth considering.

  1. Data Storage: While both Amazon Redshift Spectrum and Azure Synapse allow users to query data stored in object storage, they differ in the way data is organized. Redshift Spectrum uses an optimized columnar storage format called Parquet, which enables efficient data retrieval. On the other hand, Azure Synapse supports multiple data storage formats including Parquet, ORC, and Avro, giving users more flexibility in choosing the format that best fits their needs.

  2. Integration with Big Data Ecosystem: Redshift Spectrum is tightly integrated with the broader AWS ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other AWS services such as S3, Glue, and Athena for data ingestion, transformation, and analytics. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, is part of the larger Azure ecosystem and provides tight integration with Azure Data Lake Storage and Azure Databricks, enabling a unified data analytics experience.

  3. Query Execution Engine: Redshift Spectrum uses the same query execution engine as Amazon Redshift, allowing users to leverage the power of massively parallel processing for data warehouse queries. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, combines the Apache Spark engine for big data processing with a distributed SQL engine for data warehousing, providing users with the flexibility to run both traditional SQL queries and complex big data analytics workloads.

  4. Scalability: Both Redshift Spectrum and Azure Synapse provide elastic scalability, allowing users to scale compute resources up or down based on workload demands. However, Azure Synapse offers a unique feature called "Auto-Pause" that automatically pauses the compute resources when they are not in use, helping to optimize costs and further enhance scalability.

  5. Security and Compliance: Redshift Spectrum and Azure Synapse both provide advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, fine-grained access control, and integration with identity providers. However, Azure Synapse also offers built-in integration with Azure Active Directory, providing seamless authentication and authorization capabilities for users.

  6. Pricing Model: Redshift Spectrum follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the amount of data scanned during query execution. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, offers a consumption-based pricing model that combines compute and storage costs, providing more flexibility in managing costs based on specific workload requirements.

In summary, Redshift Spectrum and Azure Synapse differ in terms of data storage organization, integration with the ecosystem, query execution engine, scalability features, security capabilities, and pricing models. These differences provide users with a range of options to choose from based on their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

With Redshift Spectrum, you can extend the analytic power of Amazon Redshift beyond data stored on local disks in your data warehouse to query vast amounts of unstructured data in your Amazon S3 “data lake” -- without having to load or transform any data.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

-
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
Stacks
99
Stacks
104
Followers
147
Followers
230
Votes
3
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Economical
  • 1
    Good Performance
  • 1
    Great Documentation
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Concurrency
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon Redshift Spectrum, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase