StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Real Time Data Processing
  5. Amazon Kinesis vs Locust

Amazon Kinesis vs Locust

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Stacks794
Followers604
Votes9
Locust
Locust
Stacks191
Followers317
Votes51
GitHub Stars27.0K
Forks3.1K

Amazon Kinesis vs Locust: What are the differences?

# Amazon Kinesis vs Locust

Amazon Kinesis and Locust are both powerful tools used in data processing and load testing. However, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

1. **Real-time Data Processing**: Amazon Kinesis is specifically designed for real-time data processing, making it ideal for applications requiring immediate insights from data streams. On the other hand, Locust focuses on load testing, simulating user behavior to test the performance and scalability of web applications.

2. **Managed Service vs Open-source Tool**: Amazon Kinesis is a managed service provided by AWS, offering ease of use, scalability, and reliability without the need for infrastructure management. Meanwhile, Locust is an open-source tool that allows users to create custom load testing scenarios but requires more setup and management efforts.

3. **Scalability**: Amazon Kinesis is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of streaming data, making it suitable for applications with varying data ingestion rates. Locust, on the other hand, may face limitations in scalability depending on the resources available on the host machine.

4. **Cost**: While Amazon Kinesis offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, users are billed based on the resources consumed. Locust, being open-source, does not incur direct costs but may require additional resources for hosting and managing the tool.

5. **Use Case**: Amazon Kinesis is commonly used for real-time analytics, log processing, and IoT data ingestion, where immediate data processing is critical. Conversely, Locust is preferred for load testing web applications, identifying performance bottlenecks, and ensuring the application can handle user traffic spikes.

6. **Community Support**: Due to being an AWS service, Amazon Kinesis has dedicated support from AWS experts and a robust community. Locust, being open-source, relies on community contributions for updates, bug fixes, and support.

In Summary, Amazon Kinesis is best suited for real-time data processing and analytics, while Locust excels in load testing web applications for performance and scalability testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Locust
Locust

Amazon Kinesis can collect and process hundreds of gigabytes of data per second from hundreds of thousands of sources, allowing you to easily write applications that process information in real-time, from sources such as web site click-streams, marketing and financial information, manufacturing instrumentation and social media, and operational logs and metering data.

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Real-time Processing- Amazon Kinesis enables you to collect and analyze information in real-time, allowing you to answer questions about the current state of your data, from inventory levels to stock trade frequencies, rather than having to wait for an out-of-date report;Easy to use- You can create a new stream, set the throughput requirements, and start streaming data quickly and easily. Amazon Kinesis automatically provisions and manages the storage required to reliably and durably collect your data stream;High throughput. Elastic.- Amazon Kinesis seamlessly scales to match the data throughput rate and volume of your data, from megabytes to terabytes per hour. Amazon Kinesis will scale up or down based on your needs;Integrate with Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon DynamoDB- With Amazon Kinesis, you can reliably collect, process, and transform all of your data in real-time before delivering it to data stores of your choice, where it can be used by existing or new applications. Connectors enable integration with Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon DynamoDB;Build Kinesis Applications- Amazon Kinesis provides developers with client libraries that enable the design and operation of real-time data processing applications. Just add the Amazon Kinesis Client Library to your Java application and it will be notified when new data is available for processing;Low Cost- Amazon Kinesis is cost-efficient for workloads of any scale. You can pay as you go, and you’ll only pay for the resources you use. You can get started by provisioning low throughput streams, and only pay a low hourly rate for the throughput you need
Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
794
Stacks
191
Followers
604
Followers
317
Votes
9
Votes
51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    Cost
Pros
  • 15
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Easy to setup
Cons
  • 1
    Bad design
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Amazon Kinesis, Locust?

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Gatling

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Google Cloud Dataflow

Google Cloud Dataflow

Google Cloud Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope