Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Kinesis

721
599
+ 1
9
Locust

171
315
+ 1
51
Add tool

Amazon Kinesis vs Locust: What are the differences?

# Amazon Kinesis vs Locust

Amazon Kinesis and Locust are both powerful tools used in data processing and load testing. However, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

1. **Real-time Data Processing**: Amazon Kinesis is specifically designed for real-time data processing, making it ideal for applications requiring immediate insights from data streams. On the other hand, Locust focuses on load testing, simulating user behavior to test the performance and scalability of web applications.

2. **Managed Service vs Open-source Tool**: Amazon Kinesis is a managed service provided by AWS, offering ease of use, scalability, and reliability without the need for infrastructure management. Meanwhile, Locust is an open-source tool that allows users to create custom load testing scenarios but requires more setup and management efforts.

3. **Scalability**: Amazon Kinesis is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of streaming data, making it suitable for applications with varying data ingestion rates. Locust, on the other hand, may face limitations in scalability depending on the resources available on the host machine.

4. **Cost**: While Amazon Kinesis offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, users are billed based on the resources consumed. Locust, being open-source, does not incur direct costs but may require additional resources for hosting and managing the tool.

5. **Use Case**: Amazon Kinesis is commonly used for real-time analytics, log processing, and IoT data ingestion, where immediate data processing is critical. Conversely, Locust is preferred for load testing web applications, identifying performance bottlenecks, and ensuring the application can handle user traffic spikes.

6. **Community Support**: Due to being an AWS service, Amazon Kinesis has dedicated support from AWS experts and a robust community. Locust, being open-source, relies on community contributions for updates, bug fixes, and support.

In Summary, Amazon Kinesis is best suited for real-time data processing and analytics, while Locust excels in load testing web applications for performance and scalability testing.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Kinesis
Pros of Locust
  • 9
    Scalable
  • 15
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Fast
  • 2
    Test Anything

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon Kinesis
Cons of Locust
  • 3
    Cost
  • 1
    Bad design

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon Kinesis?

Amazon Kinesis can collect and process hundreds of gigabytes of data per second from hundreds of thousands of sources, allowing you to easily write applications that process information in real-time, from sources such as web site click-streams, marketing and financial information, manufacturing instrumentation and social media, and operational logs and metering data.

What is Locust?

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Amazon Kinesis?
What companies use Locust?
See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon Kinesis or Locust.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon Kinesis?
What tools integrate with Locust?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM

Segment

Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
10
6752
GitHubPythonNode.js+47
54
72315
GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
12
6566
GitHubMySQLSlack+44
109
50665
What are some alternatives to Amazon Kinesis and Locust?
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
Amazon SQS
Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Kinesis Firehose is the easiest way to load streaming data into AWS. It can capture and automatically load streaming data into Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift, enabling near real-time analytics with existing business intelligence tools and dashboards you’re already using today.
Firehose.io
Firehose is both a Rack application and JavaScript library that makes building real-time web applications possible.
See all alternatives