Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Zookeeper: What are the differences?
Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Zookeeper are two popular tools in the field of cloud computing that serve different purposes. While ECS enables users to easily run and manage Docker containers, Zookeeper is a centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. Below are the key differences between Amazon EC2 Container Service and Zookeeper.
-
Deployment Approach:
- ECS allows users to deploy Docker containers on a cluster of EC2 instances, providing flexibility and scalability. Users can easily manage container deployments, scaling, and load balancing using ECS.
- On the other hand, Zookeeper is not specifically designed for container deployment. It focuses on providing distributed coordination and synchronization services to distributed applications. It does not handle container management or deployment like ECS.
-
Use Case and Functionality:
- ECS is primarily used for running and managing Docker containers, making it an ideal choice for containerized applications and microservices architectures. It provides features like automatic load balancing, automatic scaling, and integration with other AWS services.
- Zookeeper, on the other hand, is designed to provide coordination and synchronization services for distributed applications. It is commonly used for managing distributed systems, maintaining configuration information, and providing leader election and failover capabilities.
-
Scale and Performance:
- ECS is highly scalable and can handle a large number of containers across multiple EC2 instances. It leverages the underlying scalability and performance of AWS infrastructure to ensure smooth operation of containerized applications.
- Zookeeper is optimized for handling smaller-sized data and coordination tasks in distributed systems. It may not be suitable for high-scale deployments or scenarios where a large amount of data needs to be stored and accessed.
-
Dependencies and Integration:
- ECS integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing users to leverage the full capabilities of the AWS ecosystem. It can be combined with services like AWS Fargate, AWS Elastic Load Balancer, AWS CloudFormation, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).
- Zookeeper is a standalone service and can be used with any distributed application or framework that supports Zookeeper integration. It does not have direct dependencies on specific cloud providers or services.
-
Management and Monitoring:
- ECS provides a comprehensive set of management and monitoring tools for containerized applications. It offers a web-based console, command-line interface (CLI), and APIs for managing containers, monitoring resource utilization, and troubleshooting issues.
- Zookeeper provides its own set of management and monitoring tools for monitoring the health and performance of the Zookeeper ensemble. It offers a web-based console, command-line interface, and monitoring APIs.
-
Community and Support:
- ECS benefits from the large and active community of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users. It has extensive documentation, forums, support channels, and third-party integrations available.
- Zookeeper also has a vibrant community with active user forums, mailing lists, and support resources. It is an open-source project maintained by Apache Software Foundation.
In summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is a container orchestration service that focuses on running and managing Docker containers, while Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service used for managing distributed systems and maintaining configuration information. ECS provides a more specialized solution for container deployment, scalability, and integration with AWS services, whereas Zookeeper offers more generalized distributed coordination capabilities.
If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes. EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.
Pros of Amazon EC2 Container Service
- Backed by amazon100
- Familiar to ec272
- Cluster based53
- Simple API42
- Iam roles26
- Scheduler7
- Cluster management7
- Programmatic Control7
- Container-enabled applications4
- Socker support4
- No additional cost2
- Easy to use and cheap1
Pros of Zookeeper
- High performance ,easy to generate node specific config11
- Java8
- Kafka support8
- Spring Boot Support5
- Supports extensive distributed IPC3
- Curator2
- Used in ClickHouse2
- Supports DC/OS2
- Used in Hadoop1
- Embeddable In Java Service1