StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs RabbitMQ

Amazon DynamoDB vs RabbitMQ

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Stacks21.8K
Followers18.9K
Votes558
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks4.0K

Amazon DynamoDB vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Amazon DynamoDB and RabbitMQ

Amazon DynamoDB and RabbitMQ are two popular technologies used in the field of distributed systems. While both serve different purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Data Storage vs. Message Queueing: The main difference between Amazon DynamoDB and RabbitMQ lies in their core functionality. DynamoDB is a NoSQL database service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for storing and retrieving structured data, whereas RabbitMQ is a message broker that facilitates asynchronous communication between applications through the use of message queues.

  2. Data Model: Another significant difference between DynamoDB and RabbitMQ is their data model. DynamoDB uses a key-value data model, where data is stored in tables and accessed using primary keys. On the other hand, RabbitMQ operates based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and supports a variety of messaging patterns, such as publish/subscribe and request/reply, enabling more complex data exchange scenarios.

  3. Persistence: When it comes to data persistence, DynamoDB provides built-in durability and high availability by replicating data across multiple availability zones, ensuring that data is preserved even in the event of hardware failures. In contrast, RabbitMQ does not provide built-in persistence, and messages may be lost if the broker is restarted or fails. However, RabbitMQ supports the use of durable queues, which can be saved to disk and survive broker restarts.

  4. Scalability and Performance: DynamoDB is designed to scale horizontally by automatically partitioning data across multiple servers, providing high throughput and low latency. It also offers features like on-demand autoscaling and global tables for global replication. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, can scale vertically by adding more resources to the broker nodes. Its performance is highly dependent on the hardware and network infrastructure supporting it.

  5. Message Delivery Guarantees: DynamoDB offers strong consistency and provides atomic updates to ensure that all changes to a single item are applied together. It also supports conditional writes and transactions to maintain data integrity. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, provides various levels of message delivery guarantees, such as at most once, at least once, and exactly once semantics, depending on the messaging patterns and acknowledgment mechanisms used.

  6. Use Cases: Due to their different functionalities, DynamoDB and RabbitMQ are suitable for different use cases. DynamoDB is well-suited for applications that require fast and scalable data storage, such as e-commerce platforms or real-time analytics systems. RabbitMQ is commonly used in scenarios where applications need to exchange messages asynchronously, such as event-driven architectures, task queues, or distributed systems integration.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB is a NoSQL database service designed for storing and retrieving structured data, providing scalability, durability, and performance. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is a message broker that enables asynchronous communication between applications through message queues, offering flexibility and versatility for various messaging patterns and integration scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, RabbitMQ

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Pulkit
Pulkit

Software Engineer

Oct 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoAmazon SQSAmazon SQSRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Hi! I am creating a scraping system in Django, which involves long running tasks between 1 minute & 1 Day. As I am new to Message Brokers and Task Queues, I need advice on which architecture to use for my system. ( Amazon SQS, RabbitMQ, or Celery). The system should be autoscalable using Kubernetes(K8) based on the number of pending tasks in the queue.

474k views474k
Comments
Meili
Meili

Software engineer at Digital Science

Sep 24, 2020

Needs adviceonZeroMQZeroMQRabbitMQRabbitMQAmazon SQSAmazon SQS

Hi, we are in a ZMQ set up in a push/pull pattern, and we currently start to have more traffic and cases that the service is unavailable or stuck. We want to:

  • Not loose messages in services outages
  • Safely restart service without losing messages (@{ZeroMQ}|tool:1064| seems to need to close the socket in the receiver before restart manually)

Do you have experience with this setup with ZeroMQ? Would you suggest RabbitMQ or Amazon SQS (we are in AWS setup) instead? Something else?

Thank you for your time

500k views500k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.0K
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
21.8K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
18.9K
Votes
195
Votes
558
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
Pros
  • 235
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 80
    Ease of configuration
  • 60
    I like the admin interface
  • 52
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 22
    Durable
Cons
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, RabbitMQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase