StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs Kafka

Amazon DynamoDB vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K

Amazon DynamoDB vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this section, I will provide the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Kafka.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that offers automatic scaling and high performance with low latency. It can handle millions of requests per second and can scale up or down based on demand. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that provides high scalability and performance for streaming data. It is designed to handle high-volume, real-time data streams and can horizontally scale by adding more Kafka brokers to the cluster.

  2. Data Model: DynamoDB is a key-value store that allows you to store and retrieve data using primary keys. It provides flexible indexing options with both primary and secondary indexes. You can also define schema for your data using DynamoDB's JSON-based document model. Kafka, on the other hand, is a distributed log-based messaging system. It organizes data into topics and partitions, where each partition is an ordered and immutable sequence of messages. Kafka does not provide indexing or schema enforcement on the data.

  3. Event-driven Architecture: DynamoDB captures changes to data using DynamoDB Streams, which is an optional feature that provides a time-ordered sequence of item-level modifications. It can be used to build event-driven architectures and enable real-time data processing. Kafka, on the other hand, is a messaging system that is specifically designed for building event-driven architectures. It allows producers to send messages to topics, and consumers to subscribe to specific topics and consume messages in real-time.

  4. Data Durability and Persistence: DynamoDB is a fully managed service that takes care of data durability and persistence. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability and durability. DynamoDB also provides backup and restore capabilities. Kafka, on the other hand, relies on the underlying file system to provide data durability. By default, Kafka retains messages for a configurable period of time or until a certain amount of disk space is used.

  5. Data Processing: DynamoDB is designed for online transaction processing (OLTP) workloads where you retrieve and modify individual items. It provides features like optimistic concurrency control and strongly consistent reads. Kafka, on the other hand, is designed for stream processing and real-time analytics. It provides features like fault-tolerance, scalability, and ordered message delivery, making it suitable for building data pipelines and processing high-volume, continuous streams of data.

  6. Integration and Ecosystem: DynamoDB is part of the larger Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, which provides an extensive set of services and tools for building scalable and reliable applications. It integrates well with other AWS services like Lambda, S3, and Kinesis. Kafka, on the other hand, has a rich ecosystem with support for various connectors and integrations with popular frameworks like Apache Spark, Apache Flink, and Elasticsearch.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that is highly scalable, offers high performance, and is well-integrated with the AWS ecosystem. It is best suited for online transaction processing workloads. Kafka, on the other hand, is a distributed streaming platform that provides high scalability and performance for streaming data. It is designed for building event-driven architectures and is suitable for stream processing and real-time analytics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, Kafka

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.37k views1.37k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Kafka
Kafka

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
24.2K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
22.3K
Votes
195
Votes
607
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Kafka?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase