Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Athena

512
829
+ 1
49
Apache Aurora

69
96
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon Athena vs Apache Aurora: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Amazon Athena and Apache Aurora are two popular data processing and management tools used in the computing world. Both serve unique purposes and offer distinct features to meet various user needs.

  1. Deployment and Use Case: Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that enables users to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. It is commonly used for ad-hoc querying and analysis of large amounts of data. On the other hand, Apache Aurora is a mesos framework for long-running services and cron jobs, ideal for service-oriented architectures and scalable applications.

  2. Cost Structure: Amazon Athena follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged only for the amount of data scanned by their queries. In contrast, Apache Aurora is open-source software, meaning there are no licensing fees associated with its deployment. However, users may incur costs related to infrastructure and maintenance.

  3. Scaling Capabilities: Amazon Athena is designed to automatically scale query processing based on the amount of data being scanned, allowing users to efficiently handle varying workloads. Apache Aurora, on the other hand, requires users to configure and manage the scaling of their services manually, providing greater control over resource allocation.

  4. Data Source Integration: Amazon Athena is specifically optimized for querying data stored in Amazon S3, offering seamless integration with a wide range of AWS services. In comparison, Apache Aurora can be used with various storage systems and databases, providing more flexibility in data source connectivity.

  5. Resource Management: Amazon Athena handles resource management internally, allowing users to focus solely on querying data without the need for infrastructure provisioning. Apache Aurora, on the other hand, requires users to configure resource allocation and scheduling for their services, requiring additional setup and maintenance.

  6. Community Support and Development: Amazon Athena is a fully managed service by AWS, receiving continuous updates and enhancements from a dedicated development team. Apache Aurora, being open-source, benefits from a community of contributors and developers who actively improve the software and provide support to users.

In Summary, Amazon Athena and Apache Aurora differ in deployment use cases, cost structure, scaling capabilities, data source integration, resource management, and community support, catering to distinct user needs and preferences in the data processing and management domain.

Advice on Amazon Athena and Apache Aurora

Hi all,

Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?

See more
Replies (4)

you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster

See more
Carlos Acedo
Data Technologies Manager at SDG Group Iberia · | 5 upvotes · 231.2K views
Recommends
on
Amazon RedshiftAmazon Redshift

First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.

Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.

I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.

See more
Alexis Blandin
Recommends
on
Amazon AthenaAmazon Athena

It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift

See more
Recommends

you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Athena
Pros of Apache Aurora
  • 16
    Use SQL to analyze CSV files
  • 8
    Glue crawlers gives easy Data catalogue
  • 7
    Cheap
  • 6
    Query all my data without running servers 24x7
  • 4
    No data base servers yay
  • 3
    Easy integration with QuickSight
  • 2
    Query and analyse CSV,parquet,json files in sql
  • 2
    Also glue and athena use same data catalog
  • 1
    No configuration required
  • 0
    Ad hoc checks on data made easy
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Amazon Athena?

    Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

    What is Apache Aurora?

    Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Amazon Athena and Apache Aurora as a desired skillset
    What companies use Amazon Athena?
    What companies use Apache Aurora?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon Athena or Apache Aurora.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon Athena?
    What tools integrate with Apache Aurora?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

    Segment

    PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
    7
    2551
    Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM

    Segment

    Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
    10
    6733
    Apache MesosApache AuroraPants+3
    2
    1646
    What are some alternatives to Amazon Athena and Apache Aurora?
    Presto
    Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data
    Amazon Redshift Spectrum
    With Redshift Spectrum, you can extend the analytic power of Amazon Redshift beyond data stored on local disks in your data warehouse to query vast amounts of unstructured data in your Amazon S3 “data lake” -- without having to load or transform any data.
    Amazon Redshift
    It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.
    Cassandra
    Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
    Spectrum
    The community platform for the future.
    See all alternatives