StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Ace vs Jenkins

Ace vs Jenkins

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Ace
Ace
Stacks104
Followers104
Votes7
GitHub Stars27.1K
Forks5.3K

Ace vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Ace and Jenkins are two popular tools used in the field of software development to automate various tasks and improve the efficiency of software delivery pipelines. 

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Ace is specifically designed for integrating with IBM's products and services, providing seamless integration with IBM Cloud and various other offerings. On the other hand, Jenkins is known for its extensive integration capabilities with a wide range of tools and technologies, allowing for a high level of customization and flexibility in building automation pipelines.
   
2. **Scalability**: Jenkins is highly scalable and can be easily extended through plugins to support various use cases and environments. It can scale horizontally to distribute workload across multiple nodes, making it suitable for both small and large organizations. In contrast, Ace is more focused on the IBM ecosystem and may have limitations in scalability when compared to Jenkins.
   
3. **Workflow Management**: Jenkins provides a robust pipeline-as-code feature, allowing users to define their build pipeline stages and configurations as code. This promotes version control and reproducibility of build processes. On the other hand, Ace may offer a more visual and user-friendly approach to workflow management, catering to users who prefer a graphical interface for defining automation tasks.
   
4. **Community Support**: Jenkins has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively develop plugins, provide support, and share best practices. This extensive community support ensures that users have access to a wealth of resources and solutions to common problems. Ace, being more tailored to IBM's offerings, may have a smaller community compared to Jenkins, leading to potentially fewer resources and community-driven solutions.
   
5. **Security Features**: Jenkins has made significant improvements in enhancing security features to protect automation pipelines from vulnerabilities and unauthorized access. It offers built-in security mechanisms, role-based access control, and encryption options. While Ace also prioritizes security, the specific security features and mechanisms may differ based on IBM's security standards and practices.
   
6. **Cost Considerations**: Jenkins is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and can be customized to suit individual requirements without additional licensing costs. On the other hand, Ace, being part of the IBM ecosystem, may involve licensing fees or additional costs for certain advanced features or integrations, making it potentially more expensive to implement and maintain in certain scenarios.

In Summary, Ace and Jenkins differ in terms of integration capabilities, scalability, workflow management, community support, security features, and cost considerations, catering to different user preferences and organizational requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Ace
Ace

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ace is a standalone code editor written in JavaScript. Our goal is to create a browser based editor that matches and extends the features, usability and performance of existing native editors such as TextMate, Vim or Eclipse. It can be easily embedded in any web page or JavaScript application.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
27.1K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
104
Followers
50.4K
Followers
104
Votes
2.2K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 4
    The best Editor out there
  • 1
    Faster to load and edit big files
  • 1
    Javascript based
  • 1
    Non-microsoft
Integrations
No integrations available
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Ace?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana