Alternatives to Pandoc logo

Alternatives to Pandoc

Sphinx, wkhtmltopdf, Markdown, Jekyll, and Asciidoctor are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Pandoc.
207
68
+ 1
3

What is Pandoc and what are its top alternatives?

Pandoc is a versatile document converter that supports a wide range of formats including Markdown, HTML, PDF, and more. It allows users to easily convert files between different formats and customize the output using various options. However, some limitations of Pandoc include a steep learning curve for beginners and occasional issues with complex document conversions.

  1. AsciiDoc: Asciidoctor is a powerful documentation tool that supports text formatting and converting to various formats like HTML and PDF. Pros include rich formatting options and robust syntax while cons include a slightly steeper learning curve compared to Pandoc.
  2. Marked: Marked is a lightweight markdown parser and compiler that offers real-time previews of your markdown files. It is easy to use and offers a simple interface, but lacks some advanced features available in Pandoc.
  3. MultiMarkdown: MultiMarkdown is an extended version of markdown that offers additional features like tables and footnotes. Pros include enhanced markdown support while cons include potential compatibility issues with standard markdown.
  4. Pegdown: Pegdown is a fast markdown processor for Java that offers compatibility with standard markdown syntax. Pros include speed and performance, but it may lack some of the advanced features available in Pandoc.
  5. ReText: ReText is a simple and lightweight markdown editor with support for various formats like HTML and ODT. Pros include a clean interface and easy integration with Pandoc for conversions, while cons include limited customization options.
  6. Remarkable: Remarkable is a powerful markdown editor with real-time previews and export options to formats like PDF and HTML. Pros include a user-friendly interface and robust feature set, but it may not be as versatile as Pandoc.
  7. MarkdownPad: MarkdownPad is a markdown editor for Windows with features like syntax highlighting and live preview. Pros include a simple interface and compatibility with Pandoc, while cons include limited export options compared to Pandoc.
  8. Docverter: Docverter is an online document conversion tool that supports various formats like Markdown, LaTeX, and PDF. Pros include ease of use and cloud-based functionality, but it may not offer the same level of customization as Pandoc.
  9. Paged.js: Paged.js is a tool for creating paginated documents using web standards like HTML and CSS. Pros include compatibility with modern web technologies and flexibility in document formatting, but it may require more technical knowledge compared to Pandoc.
  10. CommonMark: CommonMark is a standardized version of markdown that aims for consistency across different markdown implementations. Pros include improved compatibility between tools, while cons include potential differences in behavior compared to Pandoc's markdown parsing.

Top Alternatives to Pandoc

  • Sphinx
    Sphinx

    It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server. ...

  • wkhtmltopdf
    wkhtmltopdf

    wkhtmltopdf and wkhtmltoimage are command line tools to render HTML into PDF and various image formats using the QT Webkit rendering engine. These run entirely "headless" and do not require a display or display service. ...

  • Markdown
    Markdown

    Markdown is two things: (1) a plain text formatting syntax; and (2) a software tool, written in Perl, that converts the plain text formatting to HTML. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

  • Asciidoctor
    Asciidoctor

    It is a fast, open source text processor and publishing toolchain for converting AsciiDoc content to HTML5, DocBook, PDF, and other formats. Asciidoctor is written in Ruby and runs on all major operating systems ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

Pandoc alternatives & related posts

Sphinx logo

Sphinx

905
32
Open source full text search server, designed from the ground up with performance, relevance (aka search quality), and...
905
32
PROS OF SPHINX
  • 16
    Fast
  • 9
    Simple deployment
  • 6
    Open source
  • 1
    Lots of extentions
CONS OF SPHINX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Sphinx posts

    wkhtmltopdf logo

    wkhtmltopdf

    57
    0
    Convert HTML to PDF using Webkit (QtWebKit)
    57
    0
    PROS OF WKHTMLTOPDF
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF WKHTMLTOPDF
        Be the first to leave a con

        related wkhtmltopdf posts

        Markdown logo

        Markdown

        22.1K
        960
        Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber
        22.1K
        960
        PROS OF MARKDOWN
        • 345
          Easy formatting
        • 246
          Widely adopted
        • 194
          Intuitive
        • 132
          Github integration
        • 41
          Great for note taking
        • 2
          Defacto GitHub lingo
        CONS OF MARKDOWN
        • 2
          Cannot centralise (HTML code needed)
        • 1
          Inconsistend flavours eg github, reddit, mmd etc
        • 1
          Limited syntax
        • 1
          Not suitable for longer documents
        • 1
          Non-extensible
        • 1
          No right indentation
        • 1
          No underline
        • 1
          Unable to indent tables

        related Markdown posts

        Vaibhav Taunk
        Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 4.2M views

        I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

        See more
        Johnny Bell

        For Stack Decisions I needed to add Markdown in the decision composer to give our users access to some general styling when writing their decisions. We used React & GraphQL on the #Frontend and Ruby & GraphQL on the backend.

        Instead of using Showdown or another tool, We decided to parse the Markdown on the backend so we had more control over what we wanted to render in Markdown because we didn't want to enable all Markdown options, we also wanted to limit any malicious code or images to be embedded into the decisions and Markdown was a fairly large to import into our component so it was going to add a lot of kilobytes that we didn't need.

        We also needed to style how the markdown looked, we are currently using Glamorous so I used that but we are planning to update this to Emotion at some stage as it has a fairly easy upgrade path rather than switching over to styled-components or one of the other cssInJs alternatives.

        Also we used React-Mentions for tagging tools and topics in the decisions. Typing @ will let you tag a tool, and typing # will allow you to tag a topic.

        The Markdown options that we chose to support are tags: a, code, u, b, em, pre, ul, ol, li.

        If there are anymore tags you'd love to see added in the composer leave me a comment below and we will look into adding them.

        #StackDecisionsLaunch

        See more
        Jekyll logo

        Jekyll

        1.9K
        230
        Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
        1.9K
        230
        PROS OF JEKYLL
        • 74
          Github pages integration
        • 54
          Open source
        • 37
          It's slick, customisable and hackerish
        • 24
          Easy to deploy
        • 23
          Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
        • 7
          Gitlab pages integration
        • 5
          Best for blogging
        • 2
          Low maintenance
        • 2
          Easy to integrate localization
        • 1
          Huge plugins ecosystem
        • 1
          Authoring freedom and simplicity
        CONS OF JEKYLL
        • 4
          Build time increases exponentially as site grows
        • 2
          Lack of developments lately
        • 1
          Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

        related Jekyll posts

        Dale Ross
        Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

        I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

        I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

        Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

        See more
        Jan Vlnas
        Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 7 upvotes · 77.2K views

        Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

        There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

        If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

        If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

        Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

        See more
        Asciidoctor logo

        Asciidoctor

        154
        2
        An open source, pure Ruby processor for converting AsciiDoc documents or strings into HTML and other formats
        154
        2
        PROS OF ASCIIDOCTOR
        • 1
          GitHub integration
        • 1
          Versatile
        • 0
          Easy fornatting
        CONS OF ASCIIDOCTOR
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Asciidoctor posts

          Google Drive logo

          Google Drive

          84K
          2.1K
          A safe place for all your files
          84K
          2.1K
          PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 505
            Easy to use
          • 326
            Gmail integration
          • 312
            Enough free space
          • 268
            Collaboration
          • 249
            Stable service
          • 128
            Desktop and mobile apps
          • 97
            Offline sync
          • 79
            Apps
          • 74
            15 gb storage
          • 50
            Add-ons
          • 9
            Integrates well
          • 6
            Easy to use
          • 3
            Simple back-up tool
          • 2
            Linux terminal transfer tools
          • 2
            It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
          • 2
            Amazing
          • 2
            Beautiful
          • 2
            Fast upload speeds
          • 2
            The more the merrier
          • 2
            So easy
          • 2
            Wonderful
          • 1
            G Suite integration
          • 1
            UI
          • 1
            Windows desktop
          • 1
            Space Analytics
          CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
          • 7
            Organization via web ui sucks
          • 2
            Not a real database

          related Google Drive posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          CloudFlare logo

          CloudFlare

          77.3K
          1.8K
          The Web Performance & Security Company.
          77.3K
          1.8K
          PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 426
            Easy setup, great cdn
          • 278
            Free ssl
          • 200
            Easy setup
          • 191
            Security
          • 181
            Ssl
          • 98
            Great cdn
          • 77
            Optimizer
          • 71
            Simple
          • 44
            Great UI
          • 28
            Great js cdn
          • 12
            AutoMinify
          • 12
            HTTP/2 Support
          • 12
            Apps
          • 12
            DNS Analytics
          • 9
            Ipv6
          • 9
            Rocket Loader
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            Fantastic CDN service
          • 8
            IPv6 "One Click"
          • 7
            DNSSEC
          • 7
            Free GeoIP
          • 7
            Amazing performance
          • 7
            API
          • 7
            Cheapest SSL
          • 7
            Nice DNS
          • 7
            SSHFP
          • 6
            SPDY
          • 6
            Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
          • 5
            Asynchronous resource loading
          • 5
            Ubuntu
          • 4
            Global Load Balancing
          • 4
            Easy Use
          • 4
            Performance
          • 3
            CDN
          • 2
            Support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Registrar
          • 1
            Web3
          • 1
            Прохси
          • 1
            HTTPS3/Quic
          CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
          • 2
            No support for SSHFP records
          • 2
            Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

          related CloudFlare posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Johnny Bell

          When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

          One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

          Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

          When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

          I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

          See more
          Dropbox logo

          Dropbox

          23.5K
          1.7K
          Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
          23.5K
          1.7K
          PROS OF DROPBOX
          • 434
            Easy to work with
          • 256
            Free
          • 216
            Popular
          • 176
            Shared file hosting
          • 167
            'just works'
          • 100
            No brainer
          • 80
            Integration with external services
          • 77
            Simple
          • 49
            Good api
          • 38
            Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
          • 11
            It just works
          • 8
            Convenient
          • 7
            Accessible from all of my devices
          • 5
            Command Line client
          • 4
            Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
          • 4
            Can even be used by your grandma
          • 3
            Cross platform app
          • 3
            Sync API
          • 3
            Reliable
          • 3
            Mac app
          • 2
            Backups, local and cloud
          • 2
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
          • 2
            Delta synchronization
          • 2
            Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
          • 2
            Extended version history
          • 2
            Beautiful UI
          • 1
            YC Company
          • 1
            What a beautiful app
          • 1
            Easy/no setup
          • 1
            So easy
          • 1
            The more the merrier
          • 1
            Easy to work with
          • 1
            For when client needs file without opening firewall
          • 1
            Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Official Linux app
          • 0
            The more the merrier
          CONS OF DROPBOX
          • 3
            Personal vs company account is confusing
          • 1
            Replication kills CPU and battery

          related Dropbox posts

          Shared insights
          on
          Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

          I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

          Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

          Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

          See more