Alternatives to ORY Hydra logo

Alternatives to ORY Hydra

Keycloak, Dex, Auth0, Okta, and OpenSSL are the most popular alternatives and competitors to ORY Hydra.
23
157
+ 1
8

What is ORY Hydra and what are its top alternatives?

ORY Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect provider that aims to secure access to your applications and services. It provides features such as token validation, token introspection, consent handling, and multi-tenancy support. However, ORY Hydra may have a steep learning curve for beginners and may require additional configuration for complex use cases.

  1. Keycloak: Keycloak is an open-source Identity and Access Management solution that provides features like single sign-on, social login, and user federation. Keycloak offers a user-friendly interface for managing authentication and authorization, but it may have a more complex setup compared to ORY Hydra.
  2. Auth0: Auth0 is a cloud-based Identity as a Service (IDaaS) platform that offers secure authentication and authorization services for web, mobile, and legacy applications. Auth0 provides easy integration with popular frameworks and libraries, but it may come with additional costs compared to open-source solutions like ORY Hydra.
  3. FusionAuth: FusionAuth is a modern identity platform that provides features like user management, multi-factor authentication, and OAuth support. FusionAuth offers a developer-friendly API and flexible pricing options, but it may lack some of the advanced features present in ORY Hydra.
  4. Keycloak Gatekeeper: Keycloak Gatekeeper is a reverse proxy authentication service that integrates with Keycloak to secure web applications. Keycloak Gatekeeper offers easy integration with Keycloak for authentication and authorization, but it may be limited in terms of scalability compared to ORY Hydra.
  5. IdentityServer: IdentityServer is an open-source OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 framework for ASP.NET Core applications. IdentityServer provides extensibility through plugins and support for enterprise features, but it may have a steeper learning curve compared to ORY Hydra for developers unfamiliar with ASP.NET Core.
  6. Gluu: Gluu is an open-source IAM platform that provides secure authentication and authorization services for web and mobile applications. Gluu offers support for LDAP and Active Directory integration, but it may have more complex deployment requirements compared to ORY Hydra.
  7. Ping Identity: Ping Identity is an enterprise-grade identity platform that offers identity management, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication capabilities. Ping Identity provides comprehensive security features for large organizations, but it may be more suitable for complex enterprise use cases compared to ORY Hydra.
  8. AWS Cognito: AWS Cognito is a managed identity solution that provides authentication, authorization, and user management services for web and mobile applications. AWS Cognito offers seamless integration with other AWS services, but it may have limitations in terms of customization compared to ORY Hydra.
  9. Dex: Dex is an open-source identity provider that supports OIDC and OAuth 2.0 for Kubernetes and cloud-native applications. Dex offers lightweight deployment options and extensibility through custom connectors, but it may lack some of the advanced features present in ORY Hydra.
  10. Authelia: Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server that provides single sign-on and two-factor authentication for web applications. Authelia offers a simple configuration process and support for popular authentication protocols, but it may have limitations in terms of scalability compared to ORY Hydra.

Top Alternatives to ORY Hydra

  • Keycloak
    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

  • Dex
    Dex

    Dex is a personal CRM that helps you build stronger relationships. Remember where you left off, keep in touch, and be more thoughtful -- all in one place. ...

  • Auth0
    Auth0

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications. ...

  • Okta
    Okta

    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...

  • OpenSSL
    OpenSSL

    It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library. ...

  • Let's Encrypt
    Let's Encrypt

    It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG). ...

  • JSON Web Token
    JSON Web Token

    JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed. ...

  • Amazon Cognito
    Amazon Cognito

    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline. ...

ORY Hydra alternatives & related posts

Keycloak logo

Keycloak

705
1.3K
102
An open source identity and access management solution
705
1.3K
+ 1
102
PROS OF KEYCLOAK
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
  • 6
    Maintained by devs at Redhat
CONS OF KEYCLOAK
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side

related Keycloak posts

Shared insights
on
OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloakGitHubGitHub

Hello,

I'm trying to implement a solution for this situation:

There is a restaurant in which users can access RestAPI, using Google, Facebook, GitHub. There is even the possibility to login inside using the SPID authentication. In the first case I was considering Keycloak as a better solution for this case, but then i've read about Okta and its pros.

I cannot understand reading and searching on Google if SPID authentication is supported by OKTA. Looks like to be, because it should be using SAML, but I haven't found a clear solution.

See more
Joshua Dean Küpper
CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 798.7K views

As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

See more
Dex logo

Dex

41
53
0
Integrated, modern rolodex that helps you make the most of your network
41
53
+ 1
0
PROS OF DEX
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF DEX
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Dex posts

      Auth0 logo

      Auth0

      1.3K
      2K
      214
      Token-based Single Sign On for your Apps and APIs with social, databases and enterprise identities
      1.3K
      2K
      + 1
      214
      PROS OF AUTH0
      • 69
        JSON web token
      • 31
        Integration with 20+ Social Providers
      • 20
        It's a universal solution
      • 20
        SDKs
      • 15
        Amazing Documentation
      • 11
        Heroku Add-on
      • 8
        Enterprise support
      • 7
        Great Sample Repos
      • 7
        Extend platform with "rules"
      • 4
        Azure Add-on
      • 3
        Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
      • 3
        Passwordless
      • 2
        It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
      • 2
        Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
      • 2
        Polished
      • 2
        On-premise deployment
      • 1
        Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
      • 1
        MFA
      • 1
        Active Directory support
      • 1
        Springboot
      • 1
        SOC2
      • 1
        SAML Support
      • 1
        Great support
      • 1
        OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support
      CONS OF AUTH0
      • 15
        Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
      • 7
        Poor support
      • 4
        Rapidly changing API
      • 4
        Status page not reflect actual status

      related Auth0 posts

      Stephen Gheysens
      Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

      Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

      My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

      See more

      Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

      See more
      Okta logo

      Okta

      406
      810
      65
      Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
      406
      810
      + 1
      65
      PROS OF OKTA
      • 14
        REST API
      • 9
        SAML
      • 5
        OIDC OpenID Connect
      • 5
        Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
      • 5
        User Provisioning
      • 5
        Easy LDAP integration
      • 4
        Universal Directory
      • 4
        Tons of Identity Management features
      • 4
        SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps
      • 4
        API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service
      • 3
        Easy Active Directory integration
      • 2
        SWA applications Integration
      • 1
        SOC2
      • 0
        Test
      CONS OF OKTA
      • 5
        Pricing is too high
      • 1
        Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)

      related Okta posts

      Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

      See more
      Micha Mailänder
      CEO & Co-Founder at Dechea · | 4 upvotes · 85.3K views
      Shared insights
      on
      FaunaFaunaMongoDBMongoDBOktaOktaAuth0Auth0
      at

      If these three are your options, I would recommend going with Auth0. They have all functionality available as developer API (Okta e.g. not) so you can manage your instance with Infrastructure as code and can also easily add functionalities relatively easily with the API. They are also really powerful if we're talking about ABAC (Attribute based access control). You can also enrich your access token with custom claims from your MongoDB, that can be probably really useful, as you said that you're dealing with multi tenancy.

      We're using Auth0 in combination with Fauna Fauna is a database, so it would challenge you're mongodb. But Faunadb is the first database that implemented a full end user ABAC system directly in the database. (And also a lot easier than the ABAC systems from Okta or Auth0). This helps us, to use Auth0 only as identity platform and doing all the authorization with enriched claims over Fauna. With that you can skip in a lot of the cases you're backend, and you can request directly from the frontend your database (Blazing fast). Also, you can replace in some years Auth0 a lot easier with some upcoming cheaper (Auth0 was bought by Okta for a hilarious price) and "easy to use" passwordless identity provider like Passage.id

      See more
      OpenSSL logo

      OpenSSL

      13.1K
      6.9K
      0
      Full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security and Secure Sockets Layer protocols
      13.1K
      6.9K
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF OPENSSL
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF OPENSSL
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OpenSSL posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more
          Let's Encrypt logo

          Let's Encrypt

          1.7K
          966
          98
          A free, automated, and open Certificate Authority (CA)
          1.7K
          966
          + 1
          98
          PROS OF LET'S ENCRYPT
          • 48
            Open Source SSL
          • 32
            Simple setup
          • 9
            Free
          • 9
            Microservices
          • 0
            Easy ssl certificates
          CONS OF LET'S ENCRYPT
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Let's Encrypt posts

            JSON Web Token logo

            JSON Web Token

            648
            359
            0
            A JSON-based open standard for creating access tokens
            648
            359
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
                Be the first to leave a con

                related JSON Web Token posts

                Repost

                Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                See more

                Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku. However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                See more
                Amazon Cognito logo

                Amazon Cognito

                594
                901
                34
                Securely manage and synchronize app data for your users across their mobile devices
                594
                901
                + 1
                34
                PROS OF AMAZON COGNITO
                • 14
                  Backed by Amazon
                • 7
                  Manage Unique Identities
                • 4
                  Work Offline
                • 3
                  MFA
                • 2
                  Store and Sync
                • 1
                  Free for first 50000 users
                • 1
                  It works
                • 1
                  Integrate with Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, SAML
                • 1
                  SDKs and code samples
                CONS OF AMAZON COGNITO
                • 4
                  Massive Pain to get working
                • 3
                  Documentation often out of date
                • 2
                  Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
                • 1
                  Docs are vast but mostly useless
                • 1
                  MFA: there is no "forget device" function
                • 1
                  Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
                • 1
                  Lacks many basic features
                • 1
                  There is no "Logout" method in the API
                • 1
                  Different Language SDKs not compatible
                • 1
                  No recovery codes for MFA
                • 1
                  Hard to find expiration times for tokens/codes
                • 1
                  Only paid support

                related Amazon Cognito posts

                I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

                See more