What is NativeBase and what are its top alternatives?
NativeBase is a popular UI component library for React Native that offers a wide range of pre-designed and customizable components to help developers quickly build mobile applications. Key features of NativeBase include a large collection of ready-to-use components, theming support, and easy integration with popular front-end frameworks like React. However, some limitations of NativeBase include limited customization options for certain components and a learning curve for beginners.
React Native Elements: React Native Elements is a UI component library that provides a set of customizable and cross-platform components for React Native applications. Key features include a large library of components, easily customizable styles, and support for icon libraries. Pros of React Native Elements include a simple API and support for theming, while a con is the limited number of available components compared to NativeBase.
React Native Paper: React Native Paper is a material design library for React Native that offers a set of high-quality components with customizable styles. Key features include support for theming, seamless integration with material design guidelines, and a wide range of accessible components. Pros of React Native Paper include excellent documentation and strong community support, while a con is the focus on material design may not fit all project requirements.
Shoutem UI: Shoutem UI is a customizable UI toolkit for React Native that provides a set of well-designed components for building mobile apps. Key features include a variety of components, theming support, and an easy-to-use API. Pros of Shoutem UI include a rich set of components and support for both iOS and Android platforms, while a con is the lack of frequent updates compared to other libraries.
UI Kitten: UI Kitten is a customizable UI component library for React Native that offers a set of sleek and modern components. Key features include support for theming, a variety of components, and a focus on performance optimization. Pros of UI Kitten include a lightweight library with a modern design, while a con is the lack of some advanced components compared to NativeBase.
Ant Design Mobile: Ant Design Mobile is a mobile UI component library based on Ant Design for React Native applications. Key features include a comprehensive set of components, support for internationalization, and customizable themes. Pros of Ant Design Mobile include strong design principles and excellent documentation, while a con is the complex configuration required for customization compared to NativeBase.
PrimeReact: PrimeReact is a rich UI component library for React applications, including React Native, that offers a wide range of components for building modern web and mobile applications. Key features include a large collection of components, theming support, and seamless integration with popular front-end frameworks. Pros of PrimeReact include a diverse set of components and active community support, while a con is the focus on web applications may limit some mobile-specific features compared to NativeBase.
Evergreen: Evergreen is a React UI framework that provides a set of modular and customizable components for building user interfaces. Key features include a minimalist design, theming support, and support for desktop and mobile applications. Pros of Evergreen include a clean and modern design aesthetic, while a con is the lack of mobile-specific optimizations compared to NativeBase.
Chakra UI: Chakra UI is a simple and modular component library for React applications that offers a set of accessible and customizable components. Key features include support for theming, built-in focus management, and a low learning curve for beginners. Pros of Chakra UI include excellent accessibility features and a responsive design system, while a con is the limited number of available components compared to NativeBase.
Onsen UI: Onsen UI is a mobile UI framework for hybrid and mobile web applications that provides a set of customizable components for building cross-platform apps. Key features include a large library of components, support for Angular and React, and theming support. Pros of Onsen UI include seamless integration with popular frameworks and a focus on mobile performance, while a con is the complexity of setting up the framework compared to NativeBase.
Material-UI: Material-UI is a popular React component library that offers a wide range of material design components for creating web and mobile applications. Key features include a comprehensive set of components, theming support, and excellent documentation. Pros of Material-UI include strong design principles and a large community, while a con is the focus on web applications may not provide all features needed for mobile app development compared to NativeBase.
Top Alternatives to NativeBase
Ant DesignAn enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...
React NativeReact Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native. ...
ExpoIt is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps. ...
React Native PaperMaterial design for React Native.
MaterialExpress your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift. ...
JavaScriptJavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...
PythonPython is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...
Node.jsNode.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...
NativeBase alternatives & related posts
- Lots of components48
- Polished and enterprisey look and feel33
- TypeScript21
- Easy to integrate21
- Es6 support18
- Typescript support17
- Beautiful and solid17
- Beautifully Animated Components16
- Quick Release rhythm15
- Great documentation14
- Easy to customize Forms2
- Opensource and free of cost2
- Less24
- Large File Size10
- Poor accessibility support4
- Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries3
related Ant Design posts
Hi there!
I just want to have a simple poll/vote...
If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:
1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.
2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.
Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)
Hello, A question to frontend developers. I am a beginner on frontend.
I am building a UI for my company to replace old legacy one with React and this question is about choosing how to apply design to it.
I have Tailwind CSS on one hand and Ant Design on the other (I didnt like mui and Bootstrap doesn't seem to have enterprise components as ant) As far as I understand, tailwind is great. It allows me to literally build an application without touching the css but I have to build my own react components with it. Ant design or mantine has ready to use components which I can use and rapidly build my application.
My question is, is it the right approach to: - Use a component framework for now and replace legacy app. - Introduce tailwind later when I have a frontend resource in hand and then build own component library
Thank you.
- Learn once write everywhere214
- Cross platform174
- Javascript169
- Native ios components122
- Built by facebook69
- Easy to learn66
- Bridges me into ios development46
- It's just react40
- No compile39
- Declarative36
- Fast22
- Virtual Dom13
- Livereload12
- Insanely fast develop / test cycle12
- Great community11
- Easy setup9
- Backed by Facebook9
- Native android components9
- It is free and open source9
- Scalable7
- Highly customizable7
- Awesome6
- Great errors6
- Win win solution of hybrid app6
- Everything component6
- Not dependent on anything such as Angular5
- Simple5
- OTA update4
- Awesome, easy starting from scratch4
- Easy to use3
- As good as Native without any performance concerns3
- Over the air update (Flutter lacks)2
- Can be incrementally added to existing native apps2
- Hot reload2
- Web development meets Mobile development2
- 'It's just react'2
- Many salary2
- Ngon1
- Javascript23
- Built by facebook19
- Cant use CSS12
- 30 FPS Limit4
- Slow2
- Generate large apk even for a simple app2
- Some compenents not truly native2
related React Native posts
Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.
React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.
ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.
Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).
I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.
Hi,
I am a student and a junior developer who is a graduating candidate in comp sci major. I am about to start building my final year project which is a real-time messaging application for software developers to Enhance Knowledge Exchange and Problem Solving. It is mainly a chat application with more enhanced features. I am planning to use React and React Native for the frontend and cross-platform mobile apps, Node.js and ExpressJS for the backend, GraphQL for fetching and manipulating data from the backend and PostgreSQL for the database, and finally Socket.IO for the real-time chatting and communication. I would highly appreciate it if anyone here with experience in building similar apps to tell me if I made a good choice or suggest better tech stacks.
Thanks in advance.
- Free15
- Hot Reload13
- Easy to learn9
- Common ios and android app setup9
- Open Source6
- Streamlined6
- Builds into a React Native app5
- PWA supported2
- Plugins for web use with Next.js1
related Expo posts
Recently, the team at Stream published a React Native SDK for our new Chat by Stream product. React Native brings the power of JavaScript to the world of mobile development, making it easy to develop apps for multiple platforms. We decided to publish two different endpoints for the SDK – Expo and React Native (non-expo), to avoid the hurdle and setup of using the Expo library in React Native only projects on the consumer side.
The capability of style customization is one a large deal breaker for frontend SDKs. To solve this, we decided to use styled-components in our SDK, which makes it easy to add support for themes on top of our existing components. This practice reduces the maintenance effort for stylings of custom components and keeps the overall codebase clean.
For module bundling, we decided to go with Rollup.js instead of Webpack due to its simplicity and performance in the area of library/module providers. We are using Babel for transpiling code, enabling our team to use JavaScript's next-generation features. Additionally, we are using the React Styleguidist component documentation, which makes documenting the React Native code a breeze.
I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.
The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/
related React Native Paper posts
- Good Documentation1
- Samples included1
- IOS benefits1
related Material posts
JavaScript
- Can be used on frontend/backend1.7K
- It's everywhere1.5K
- Lots of great frameworks1.2K
- Fast899
- Light weight746
- Flexible425
- You can't get a device today that doesn't run js392
- Non-blocking i/o286
- Ubiquitousness237
- Expressive191
- Extended functionality to web pages55
- Relatively easy language49
- Executed on the client side46
- Relatively fast to the end user30
- Pure Javascript25
- Functional programming21
- Async15
- Full-stack13
- Future Language of The Web12
- Its everywhere12
- Setup is easy12
- Because I love functions11
- JavaScript is the New PHP11
- Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard10
- Expansive community9
- Everyone use it9
- Can be used in backend, frontend and DB9
- Easy9
- Easy to hire developers8
- No need to use PHP8
- Can be used both as frontend and backend as well8
- For the good parts8
- Powerful8
- Most Popular Language in the World8
- Versitile7
- It's fun7
- Nice7
- Hard not to use7
- Its fun and fast7
- Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas7
- Agile, packages simple to use7
- Supports lambdas and closures7
- Love-hate relationship7
- Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in7
- Evolution of C7
- It let's me use Babel & Typescript6
- Easy to make something6
- Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui6
- 1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend6
- Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res6
- Scope manipulation5
- Client processing5
- Clojurescript5
- Promise relationship5
- Everywhere5
- What to add5
- Function expressions are useful for callbacks5
- Stockholm Syndrome5
- Only Programming language on browser4
- Because it is so simple and lightweight4
- Asda1
- Love it1
- Test1
- Easy to understand1
- Not the best1
- Hard to learn1
- Test21
- Subskill #41
- Easy to learn1
- Easy to learn and test1
- Hard 彤0
- A constant moving target, too much churn22
- Horribly inconsistent20
- Javascript is the New PHP15
- No ability to monitor memory utilitization9
- Shows Zero output in case of ANY error8
- Thinks strange results are better than errors7
- Can be ugly6
- No GitHub3
- Slow2
- HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs0
related JavaScript posts
Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.
But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.
But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.
Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.
How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:
Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.
Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:
https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/
(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)
Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark
Python
- Great libraries1.2K
- Readable code965
- Beautiful code848
- Rapid development789
- Large community692
- Open source439
- Elegant394
- Great community283
- Object oriented274
- Dynamic typing222
- Great standard library78
- Very fast62
- Functional programming56
- Easy to learn52
- Scientific computing47
- Great documentation36
- Productivity30
- Matlab alternative29
- Easy to read29
- Simple is better than complex25
- It's the way I think21
- Imperative20
- Very programmer and non-programmer friendly19
- Free19
- Powerfull language17
- Machine learning support17
- Fast and simple16
- Scripting14
- Explicit is better than implicit12
- Ease of development11
- Clear and easy and powerfull10
- Unlimited power9
- It's lean and fun to code8
- Import antigravity8
- Print "life is short, use python"7
- Python has great libraries for data processing7
- Although practicality beats purity6
- Fast coding and good for competitions6
- There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious6
- High Documented language6
- Readability counts6
- Rapid Prototyping6
- I love snakes6
- Now is better than never6
- Flat is better than nested6
- Great for tooling6
- Great for analytics5
- Web scraping5
- Lists, tuples, dictionaries5
- Complex is better than complicated4
- Socially engaged community4
- Plotting4
- Beautiful is better than ugly4
- Easy to learn and use4
- Easy to setup and run smooth4
- Simple and easy to learn4
- Multiple Inheritence4
- CG industry needs4
- List comprehensions3
- Powerful language for AI3
- Flexible and easy3
- It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi3
- Many types of collections3
- If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g3
- If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id3
- Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules3
- Pip install everything3
- No cruft3
- Generators3
- Import this3
- Can understand easily who are new to programming2
- Securit2
- Should START with this but not STICK with This2
- A-to-Z2
- Because of Netflix2
- Only one way to do it2
- Better outcome2
- Good for hacking2
- Batteries included2
- Procedural programming2
- Sexy af1
- Automation friendly1
- Slow1
- Best friend for NLP1
- Powerful0
- Keep it simple0
- Ni0
- Still divided between python 2 and python 353
- Performance impact28
- Poor syntax for anonymous functions26
- GIL22
- Package management is a mess19
- Too imperative-oriented14
- Hard to understand12
- Dynamic typing12
- Very slow12
- Indentations matter a lot8
- Not everything is expression8
- Incredibly slow7
- Explicit self parameter in methods7
- Requires C functions for dynamic modules6
- Poor DSL capabilities6
- No anonymous functions6
- Fake object-oriented programming5
- Threading5
- The "lisp style" whitespaces5
- Official documentation is unclear.5
- Hard to obfuscate5
- Circular import5
- Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"4
- The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit4
- Not suitable for autocomplete4
- Meta classes2
- Training wheels (forced indentation)1
related Python posts
How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:
Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.
Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:
https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/
(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)
Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark
Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.
It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.
I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.
What do you think about TensorFlow?
Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.
Node.js
- Npm1.4K
- Javascript1.3K
- Great libraries1.1K
- High-performance1K
- Open source805
- Great for apis487
- Asynchronous477
- Great community425
- Great for realtime apps390
- Great for command line utilities296
- Websockets86
- Node Modules84
- Uber Simple69
- Great modularity59
- Allows us to reuse code in the frontend58
- Easy to start42
- Great for Data Streaming35
- Realtime32
- Awesome28
- Non blocking IO25
- Can be used as a proxy18
- High performance, open source, scalable17
- Non-blocking and modular16
- Easy and Fun15
- Easy and powerful14
- Future of BackEnd13
- Same lang as AngularJS13
- Fullstack12
- Fast11
- Scalability10
- Cross platform10
- Simple9
- Mean Stack8
- Great for webapps7
- Easy concurrency7
- Typescript6
- Fast, simple code and async6
- React6
- Friendly6
- Control everything5
- Its amazingly fast and scalable5
- Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's5
- Scalable5
- Great speed5
- Fast development5
- It's fast4
- Easy to use4
- Isomorphic coolness4
- Great community3
- Not Python3
- Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity3
- TypeScript Support3
- Blazing fast3
- Performant and fast prototyping3
- Easy to learn3
- Easy3
- Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express3
- One language, end-to-end3
- Less boilerplate code3
- Npm i ape-updating2
- Event Driven2
- Lovely2
- Creat for apis1
- Node0
- Bound to a single CPU46
- New framework every day45
- Lots of terrible examples on the internet40
- Asynchronous programming is the worst33
- Callback24
- Javascript19
- Dependency hell11
- Dependency based on GitHub11
- Low computational power10
- Very very Slow7
- Can block whole server easily7
- Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence7
- Breaking updates4
- Unstable4
- Unneeded over complication3
- No standard approach3
- Bad transitive dependency management1
- Can't read server session1
related Node.js posts
Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework
Hello community,
I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.
I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.
Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?
I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery
For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:
Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have
GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.
MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website




































