Alternatives to NativeBase logo

Alternatives to NativeBase

Ant Design, React Native, Expo, React Native Paper, and Material are the most popular alternatives and competitors to NativeBase.
84
273
+ 1
3

What is NativeBase and what are its top alternatives?

NativeBase is a popular UI component library for React Native that offers a wide range of pre-designed and customizable components to help developers quickly build mobile applications. Key features of NativeBase include a large collection of ready-to-use components, theming support, and easy integration with popular front-end frameworks like React. However, some limitations of NativeBase include limited customization options for certain components and a learning curve for beginners.

  1. React Native Elements: React Native Elements is a UI component library that provides a set of customizable and cross-platform components for React Native applications. Key features include a large library of components, easily customizable styles, and support for icon libraries. Pros of React Native Elements include a simple API and support for theming, while a con is the limited number of available components compared to NativeBase.

  2. React Native Paper: React Native Paper is a material design library for React Native that offers a set of high-quality components with customizable styles. Key features include support for theming, seamless integration with material design guidelines, and a wide range of accessible components. Pros of React Native Paper include excellent documentation and strong community support, while a con is the focus on material design may not fit all project requirements.

  3. Shoutem UI: Shoutem UI is a customizable UI toolkit for React Native that provides a set of well-designed components for building mobile apps. Key features include a variety of components, theming support, and an easy-to-use API. Pros of Shoutem UI include a rich set of components and support for both iOS and Android platforms, while a con is the lack of frequent updates compared to other libraries.

  4. UI Kitten: UI Kitten is a customizable UI component library for React Native that offers a set of sleek and modern components. Key features include support for theming, a variety of components, and a focus on performance optimization. Pros of UI Kitten include a lightweight library with a modern design, while a con is the lack of some advanced components compared to NativeBase.

  5. Ant Design Mobile: Ant Design Mobile is a mobile UI component library based on Ant Design for React Native applications. Key features include a comprehensive set of components, support for internationalization, and customizable themes. Pros of Ant Design Mobile include strong design principles and excellent documentation, while a con is the complex configuration required for customization compared to NativeBase.

  6. PrimeReact: PrimeReact is a rich UI component library for React applications, including React Native, that offers a wide range of components for building modern web and mobile applications. Key features include a large collection of components, theming support, and seamless integration with popular front-end frameworks. Pros of PrimeReact include a diverse set of components and active community support, while a con is the focus on web applications may limit some mobile-specific features compared to NativeBase.

  7. Evergreen: Evergreen is a React UI framework that provides a set of modular and customizable components for building user interfaces. Key features include a minimalist design, theming support, and support for desktop and mobile applications. Pros of Evergreen include a clean and modern design aesthetic, while a con is the lack of mobile-specific optimizations compared to NativeBase.

  8. Chakra UI: Chakra UI is a simple and modular component library for React applications that offers a set of accessible and customizable components. Key features include support for theming, built-in focus management, and a low learning curve for beginners. Pros of Chakra UI include excellent accessibility features and a responsive design system, while a con is the limited number of available components compared to NativeBase.

  9. Onsen UI: Onsen UI is a mobile UI framework for hybrid and mobile web applications that provides a set of customizable components for building cross-platform apps. Key features include a large library of components, support for Angular and React, and theming support. Pros of Onsen UI include seamless integration with popular frameworks and a focus on mobile performance, while a con is the complexity of setting up the framework compared to NativeBase.

  10. Material-UI: Material-UI is a popular React component library that offers a wide range of material design components for creating web and mobile applications. Key features include a comprehensive set of components, theming support, and excellent documentation. Pros of Material-UI include strong design principles and a large community, while a con is the focus on web applications may not provide all features needed for mobile app development compared to NativeBase.

Top Alternatives to NativeBase

  • Ant Design
    Ant Design

    An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...

  • React Native
    React Native

    React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native. ...

  • Expo
    Expo

    It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps. ...

  • React Native Paper
    React Native Paper

    Material design for React Native.

  • Material
    Material

    Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

NativeBase alternatives & related posts

Ant Design logo

Ant Design

1.1K
224
A set of high-quality React components
1.1K
224
PROS OF ANT DESIGN
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
  • 17
    Typescript support
  • 17
    Beautiful and solid
  • 16
    Beautifully Animated Components
  • 15
    Quick Release rhythm
  • 14
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Easy to customize Forms
  • 2
    Opensource and free of cost
CONS OF ANT DESIGN
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries

related Ant Design posts

Sarmad Chaudhary
Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 1.4M views

Hi there!

I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

See more

Hello, A question to frontend developers. I am a beginner on frontend.

I am building a UI for my company to replace old legacy one with React and this question is about choosing how to apply design to it.

I have Tailwind CSS on one hand and Ant Design on the other (I didnt like mui and Bootstrap doesn't seem to have enterprise components as ant) As far as I understand, tailwind is great. It allows me to literally build an application without touching the css but I have to build my own react components with it. Ant design or mantine has ready to use components which I can use and rapidly build my application.

My question is, is it the right approach to: - Use a component framework for now and replace legacy app. - Introduce tailwind later when I have a frontend resource in hand and then build own component library

Thank you.

See more
React Native logo

React Native

34.3K
1.2K
A framework for building native apps with React
34.3K
1.2K
PROS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 214
    Learn once write everywhere
  • 174
    Cross platform
  • 169
    Javascript
  • 122
    Native ios components
  • 69
    Built by facebook
  • 66
    Easy to learn
  • 46
    Bridges me into ios development
  • 40
    It's just react
  • 39
    No compile
  • 36
    Declarative
  • 22
    Fast
  • 13
    Virtual Dom
  • 12
    Livereload
  • 12
    Insanely fast develop / test cycle
  • 11
    Great community
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Backed by Facebook
  • 9
    Native android components
  • 9
    It is free and open source
  • 7
    Scalable
  • 7
    Highly customizable
  • 6
    Awesome
  • 6
    Great errors
  • 6
    Win win solution of hybrid app
  • 6
    Everything component
  • 5
    Not dependent on anything such as Angular
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    OTA update
  • 4
    Awesome, easy starting from scratch
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    As good as Native without any performance concerns
  • 2
    Over the air update (Flutter lacks)
  • 2
    Can be incrementally added to existing native apps
  • 2
    Hot reload
  • 2
    Web development meets Mobile development
  • 2
    'It's just react'
  • 2
    Many salary
  • 1
    Ngon
CONS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 23
    Javascript
  • 19
    Built by facebook
  • 12
    Cant use CSS
  • 4
    30 FPS Limit
  • 2
    Slow
  • 2
    Generate large apk even for a simple app
  • 2
    Some compenents not truly native

related React Native posts

Collins Ogbuzuru
Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 73 upvotes · 479.1K views

Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

See more
dagim debebe

Hi,

I am a student and a junior developer who is a graduating candidate in comp sci major. I am about to start building my final year project which is a real-time messaging application for software developers to Enhance Knowledge Exchange and Problem Solving. It is mainly a chat application with more enhanced features. I am planning to use React and React Native for the frontend and cross-platform mobile apps, Node.js and ExpressJS for the backend, GraphQL for fetching and manipulating data from the backend and PostgreSQL for the database, and finally Socket.IO for the real-time chatting and communication. I would highly appreciate it if anyone here with experience in building similar apps to tell me if I made a good choice or suggest better tech stacks.

Thanks in advance.

See more
Expo logo

Expo

760
66
Build one project that runs natively on all your users' devices
760
66
PROS OF EXPO
  • 15
    Free
  • 13
    Hot Reload
  • 9
    Easy to learn
  • 9
    Common ios and android app setup
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Streamlined
  • 5
    Builds into a React Native app
  • 2
    PWA supported
  • 1
    Plugins for web use with Next.js
CONS OF EXPO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Expo posts

    Vishal Narkhede
    Javascript Developer at getStream.io · | 19 upvotes · 624.6K views

    Recently, the team at Stream published a React Native SDK for our new Chat by Stream product. React Native brings the power of JavaScript to the world of mobile development, making it easy to develop apps for multiple platforms. We decided to publish two different endpoints for the SDK – Expo and React Native (non-expo), to avoid the hurdle and setup of using the Expo library in React Native only projects on the consumer side.

    The capability of style customization is one a large deal breaker for frontend SDKs. To solve this, we decided to use styled-components in our SDK, which makes it easy to add support for themes on top of our existing components. This practice reduces the maintenance effort for stylings of custom components and keeps the overall codebase clean.

    For module bundling, we decided to go with Rollup.js instead of Webpack due to its simplicity and performance in the area of library/module providers. We are using Babel for transpiling code, enabling our team to use JavaScript's next-generation features. Additionally, we are using the React Styleguidist component documentation, which makes documenting the React Native code a breeze.

    See more
    Sezgi Ulucam
    Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 967.4K views

    I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

    The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

    See more
    React Native Paper logo

    React Native Paper

    62
    0
    Material Design for React Native (Android & iOS)
    62
    0
    PROS OF REACT NATIVE PAPER
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF REACT NATIVE PAPER
        Be the first to leave a con

        related React Native Paper posts

        Material logo

        Material

        94
        3
        A Graphics Framework for Material Design in Swift
        94
        3
        PROS OF MATERIAL
        • 1
          Good Documentation
        • 1
          Samples included
        • 1
          IOS benefits
        CONS OF MATERIAL
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Material posts

          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          372.5K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          372.5K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 899
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Nice
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            What to add
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 1
            Asda
          • 1
            Love it
          • 1
            Test
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          250.9K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          250.9K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 965
            Readable code
          • 848
            Beautiful code
          • 789
            Rapid development
          • 692
            Large community
          • 439
            Open source
          • 394
            Elegant
          • 283
            Great community
          • 274
            Object oriented
          • 222
            Dynamic typing
          • 78
            Great standard library
          • 62
            Very fast
          • 56
            Functional programming
          • 52
            Easy to learn
          • 47
            Scientific computing
          • 36
            Great documentation
          • 30
            Productivity
          • 29
            Matlab alternative
          • 29
            Easy to read
          • 25
            Simple is better than complex
          • 21
            It's the way I think
          • 20
            Imperative
          • 19
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 19
            Free
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

          Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

          It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

          I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

          What do you think about TensorFlow?

          Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

          See more
          Node.js logo

          Node.js

          193.4K
          8.5K
          A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
          193.4K
          8.5K
          PROS OF NODE.JS
          • 1.4K
            Npm
          • 1.3K
            Javascript
          • 1.1K
            Great libraries
          • 1K
            High-performance
          • 805
            Open source
          • 487
            Great for apis
          • 477
            Asynchronous
          • 425
            Great community
          • 390
            Great for realtime apps
          • 296
            Great for command line utilities
          • 86
            Websockets
          • 84
            Node Modules
          • 69
            Uber Simple
          • 59
            Great modularity
          • 58
            Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
          • 42
            Easy to start
          • 35
            Great for Data Streaming
          • 32
            Realtime
          • 28
            Awesome
          • 25
            Non blocking IO
          • 18
            Can be used as a proxy
          • 17
            High performance, open source, scalable
          • 16
            Non-blocking and modular
          • 15
            Easy and Fun
          • 14
            Easy and powerful
          • 13
            Future of BackEnd
          • 13
            Same lang as AngularJS
          • 12
            Fullstack
          • 11
            Fast
          • 10
            Scalability
          • 10
            Cross platform
          • 9
            Simple
          • 8
            Mean Stack
          • 7
            Great for webapps
          • 7
            Easy concurrency
          • 6
            Typescript
          • 6
            Fast, simple code and async
          • 6
            React
          • 6
            Friendly
          • 5
            Control everything
          • 5
            Its amazingly fast and scalable
          • 5
            Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
          • 5
            Scalable
          • 5
            Great speed
          • 5
            Fast development
          • 4
            It's fast
          • 4
            Easy to use
          • 4
            Isomorphic coolness
          • 3
            Great community
          • 3
            Not Python
          • 3
            Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
          • 3
            TypeScript Support
          • 3
            Blazing fast
          • 3
            Performant and fast prototyping
          • 3
            Easy to learn
          • 3
            Easy
          • 3
            Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
          • 3
            One language, end-to-end
          • 3
            Less boilerplate code
          • 2
            Npm i ape-updating
          • 2
            Event Driven
          • 2
            Lovely
          • 1
            Creat for apis
          • 0
            Node
          CONS OF NODE.JS
          • 46
            Bound to a single CPU
          • 45
            New framework every day
          • 40
            Lots of terrible examples on the internet
          • 33
            Asynchronous programming is the worst
          • 24
            Callback
          • 19
            Javascript
          • 11
            Dependency hell
          • 11
            Dependency based on GitHub
          • 10
            Low computational power
          • 7
            Very very Slow
          • 7
            Can block whole server easily
          • 7
            Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
          • 4
            Breaking updates
          • 4
            Unstable
          • 3
            Unneeded over complication
          • 3
            No standard approach
          • 1
            Bad transitive dependency management
          • 1
            Can't read server session

          related Node.js posts

          Anurag Maurya

          Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

          Hello community,

          I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

          I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

          Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

          I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

          For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

          1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

          2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

          3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

          See more