What is Drift and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Drift
Intercom is a customer communication platform with a suite of integrated products for every team—including sales, marketing, product, and support. Have targeted communication with customers on your website, inside apps, and by email. ...
Freshchat is a modern messaging software built for teams who want to ace customer conversations—marketing, sales, or support. ...
Attract, convert, close and delight customers with HubSpot’s complete set of marketing tools. HubSpot all-in-one marketing software helps more than 12,000 companies in 56 countries attract leads and convert them into customers. ...
Punch allows you to use boilerplates to quickly setup a site, write minimal templates with Mustache, and create flexible site structures with inheritable layouts and partials. ...
Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C. ...
It is a live chat support & messaging application that focuses on successful communication between businesses and their customers. ...
LiveChat provides a live chat application with help desk and web analytics functionalities, allowing online businesses to communicate with visitors in real time. ...
Olark is a lightweight tool to chat with visitors to your website using your existing instant messaging client. Visitors to your website appear as buddies on your Buddy list, their messages to you appear as IMs. ...
Drift alternatives & related posts
- Know who your users are167
- In-app messaging as well as email107
- Customer support88
- Usage tracking68
- Great Blog18
- Organized engagement, great ui & service11
- Direct chat with customers on your site9
- Very helpful4
- Onboarding new users3
- No Mac app2
- Free tier2
- Filter and segment users2
- Github integration2
- Very Useful2
- Changes pricing model all the time7
related Intercom posts
As a small startup we are very conscious about picking up the tools we use to run the project. After suffering with a mess of using at the same time Trello , Slack , Telegram and what not, we arrived at a small set of tools that cover all our current needs. For product management, file sharing, team communication etc we chose Basecamp and couldn't be more happy about it. For Customer Support and Sales Intercom works amazingly well. We are using MailChimp for email marketing since over 4 years and it still covers all our needs. Then on payment side combination of Stripe and Octobat helps us to process all the payments and generate compliant invoices. On techie side we use Rollbar and GitLab (for both code and CI). For corporate email we picked G Suite. That all costs us in total around 300$ a month, which is quite okay.
In order to fix this, we had to set up our own content delivery service. We chose Amazon CloudFront and Amazon S3 to do the job because it has a good synergy with Heroku PaaS we are already using.
related Freshchat posts
- Lead management43
- Automatic customer segmenting based on properties19
- Email / Blog scheduling17
- Any Franchises using Hubspot Sales CRM?1
related HubSpot posts
Looking for the best CRM choice for an early-stage tech company selling through product-led growth to medium and big companies. Don't know if Salesforce or HubSpot are too rigid for PGL and expensive. I also had an experience of companies outgrowing Pipedrive pretty fast
related Punch posts
- Not Objective-C125
- Backed by apple106
- Type inference92
- Semicolon free49
- Tuples offer compound variables35
- Easy to learn24
- Clean Syntax23
- Open Source21
- Beautiful Code19
- Protocol-oriented programming10
- Promotes safe, readable code10
- No S-l-o-w JVM8
- Explicit optionals8
- Storyboard designer7
- Type safety5
- Best UI concept5
- Super addicting language, great people, open, elegant5
- Its friendly4
- Swift is faster than Objective-C4
- Feels like a better C++4
- Highly Readable codes4
- Faster and looks better4
- Much more fun3
- Easy to learn and work3
- Protocol extensions3
- Its fun and damn fast3
- Strong Type safety3
- Easy to Maintain3
- Protocol oriented programming2
- Type Safe2
- All Cons C# and Java Swift Already has2
- Protocol as type2
- Can interface with C easily1
- Numbers with underbar1
- Optional chain1
- Runs Python 8 times faster1
- Actually don't have to own a mac1
- Free from Memory Leak1
- Swift is easier to understand for non-iOS developers.1
- Great for Multi-Threaded Programming1
- Must own a mac5
- Memory leaks are not uncommon2
- Very irritatingly picky about things that’s1
- Complicated process for exporting modules1
- Its classes compile to roughly 300 lines of assembly1
- Is a lot more effort than lua to make simple functions1
- Overly complex options makes it easy to create bad code0
related Swift posts
Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?
What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!
Excerpts from how we developed (and subsequently open sourced) Uber's cross-platform mobile architecture framework, RIBs , going from Objective-C to Swift in the process for iOS: https://github.com/uber/RIBs
Uber’s new application architecture (RIBs) extensively uses protocols to keep its various components decoupled and testable. We used this architecture for the first time in our new rider application and moved our primary language from Objective-C to Swift. Since Swift is a very static language, unit testing became problematic. Dynamic languages have good frameworks to build test mocks, stubs, or stand-ins by dynamically creating or modifying existing concrete classes.
Needless to say, we were not very excited about the additional complexity of manually writing and maintaining mock implementations for each of our thousands of protocols.
The information required to generate mock classes already exists in the Swift protocol. For Uber’s use case, we set out to create tooling that would let engineers automatically generate test mocks for any protocol they wanted by simply annotating them.
The iOS codebase for our rider application alone incorporates around 1,500 of these generated mocks. Without our code generation tool, all of these would have to be written and maintained by hand, which would have made testing much more time-intensive. Auto-generated mocks have contributed a lot to the unit test coverage that we have today.
We built these code generation tools ourselves for a number of reasons, including that there weren’t many open source tools available at the time we started our effort. Today, there are some great open source tools to generate resource accessors, like SwiftGen. And Sourcery can help you with generic code generation needs:
(GitHub : https://github.com/uber/RIBs )
- Easy setup10
- Real time7
related tawk.to posts
- Nicely documented, powerful API1
related LiveChat posts
- Easy to communicate with customers28
- Simple setup14
- Good interface11
- Chrome/Safari notifications about new messages4
- Gchat integration2
- Integrated Feedback2
- great support1