Alternatives to Docsify logo

Alternatives to Docsify

Yesware, MkDocs, Gitbook, VuePress, and Docusaurus are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Docsify.
34
136
+ 1
0

What is Docsify and what are its top alternatives?

Docsify is a lightweight documentation site generator that pulls your markdown files to create a website. It offers features like searching capabilities, themes, and plugins. However, some limitations include a lack of advanced customization options and limited support for complex documentation structures.

  1. Docusaurus: Docusaurus is an open-source project for building, deploying, and maintaining open-source project websites easily. Key features include out-of-the-box support for markdown files, customizable themes, and versioning. Pros include active community support, but cons include limited flexibility in design.
  2. Sphinx: Sphinx is a tool that makes it easy to create intelligent and beautiful documentation. It supports many output formats like HTML, LaTeX, PDF, and more. Key features include support for automatic docstrings extraction and reStructuredText markup language. Pros include extensive customization options, but cons include a steeper learning curve.
  3. GitBook: GitBook is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products to internal knowledge bases. Key features include a collaborative editor, version control, and customizable templates. Pros include a user-friendly interface, but cons include pricing for advanced features.
  4. MkDocs: MkDocs is a fast, simple, and downright gorgeous static site generator that's geared towards project documentation. Key features include easy customization, theme support, and a built-in dev server. Pros include simplicity and ease of use, but cons include limited plugin support.
  5. Read the Docs: Read the Docs hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. Key features include automatic building, versioning, and searchable documentation. Pros include free hosting for open-source projects, but cons include limited design customization.
  6. VuePress: VuePress is a minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theme system. Key features include Markdown support, default theme, and plugin support. Pros include performance and SEO optimization, but cons include limited themes available.
  7. Slate: Slate helps you create beautiful, intelligent, responsive API documentation. Key features include a clean, intuitive design, interactive API console, and easy customization. Pros include elegant design options, but cons include a smaller community compared to other tools.
  8. Docz: Docz is a customizable documentation framework that lets you focus on writing documentation. Key features include a live-reloading dev server, MDX support, and theming system. Pros include MDX support for interactive documentation, but cons include performance issues with larger projects.
  9. Gatsby: Gatsby is a modern website and app generator that builds performance into every webpage. Key features include React-based framework, GraphQL integration, and plugin ecosystem. Pros include speed and performance optimizations, but cons include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  10. Hexo: Hexo is a fast, simple, and powerful blog framework. Key features include Markdown support, plugins, and themes. Pros include speed and ease of use, but cons include limited built-in functionality compared to other platforms.

Top Alternatives to Docsify

  • Yesware
    Yesware

    It helps build lasting business relationships, right from your inbox. A sales engagement platform designed for sales professionals and account managers. ...

  • MkDocs
    MkDocs

    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes. ...

  • Gitbook
    Gitbook

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team. ...

  • VuePress
    VuePress

    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects. ...

  • Docusaurus
    Docusaurus

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

  • Sphinx
    Sphinx

    It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

Docsify alternatives & related posts

Yesware logo

Yesware

8
0
Lets you track emails and work more effectively, right from your Gmail or Outlook inbox
8
0
PROS OF YESWARE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF YESWARE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Yesware posts

      MkDocs logo

      MkDocs

      131
      14
      A static site generator
      131
      14
      PROS OF MKDOCS
      • 5
        Speed
      • 4
        Gitlab integration
      • 3
        Extensibility
      • 2
        Themes
      CONS OF MKDOCS
      • 1
        Build time increases exponentially as site grows

      related MkDocs posts

      Nikolaj Ivancic

      I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

      Any opinions?

      See more
      Gitbook logo

      Gitbook

      219
      10
      Document Everything! For you, your users and your team
      219
      10
      PROS OF GITBOOK
      • 6
        Prueba
      • 4
        Integrated high-quality editor
      CONS OF GITBOOK
      • 1
        No longer Git or Open
      • 1
        Just sync with GitHub

      related Gitbook posts

      VuePress logo

      VuePress

      365
      8
      A static-site generator built by the Vue.js team
      365
      8
      PROS OF VUEPRESS
      • 4
        It's Vue
      • 2
        Created by the vue.js developers
      • 2
        Built in text search feature
      CONS OF VUEPRESS
      • 3
        Its Vue

      related VuePress posts

      Nikolaj Ivancic

      I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

      Any opinions?

      See more
      Docusaurus logo

      Docusaurus

      241
      35
      Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
      241
      35
      PROS OF DOCUSAURUS
      • 8
        Open Source
      • 7
        Self Hosted
      • 3
        Free to use
      • 3
        React
      • 3
        Easy customization
      • 3
        Jamstack
      • 3
        MDX
      • 3
        I18n
      • 2
        Versioning
      CONS OF DOCUSAURUS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Docusaurus posts

        Salina Acharya
        Senior Software Engineer at Datamine Software · | 6 upvotes · 164.8K views
        Shared insights
        on
        jsdocjsdocDocusaurusDocusaurusReactReact

        Hello, I need to write documentation for my React codebase. I am tossing between Docusaurus and jsdoc. I liked everything about Docusaurus but then it doesn't seem to generate a web file like jsdoc does once the code is commented with the required tags. I was hoping I could get some advice on which tool to go with for my React application.

        See more
        Jekyll logo

        Jekyll

        1.9K
        230
        Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
        1.9K
        230
        PROS OF JEKYLL
        • 74
          Github pages integration
        • 54
          Open source
        • 37
          It's slick, customisable and hackerish
        • 24
          Easy to deploy
        • 23
          Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
        • 7
          Gitlab pages integration
        • 5
          Best for blogging
        • 2
          Low maintenance
        • 2
          Easy to integrate localization
        • 1
          Huge plugins ecosystem
        • 1
          Authoring freedom and simplicity
        CONS OF JEKYLL
        • 4
          Build time increases exponentially as site grows
        • 2
          Lack of developments lately
        • 1
          Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

        related Jekyll posts

        Dale Ross
        Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

        I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

        I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

        Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

        See more
        Jan Vlnas
        Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 63.5K views

        Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

        There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

        If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

        If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

        Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

        See more
        Sphinx logo

        Sphinx

        904
        32
        Open source full text search server, designed from the ground up with performance, relevance (aka search quality), and...
        904
        32
        PROS OF SPHINX
        • 16
          Fast
        • 9
          Simple deployment
        • 6
          Open source
        • 1
          Lots of extentions
        CONS OF SPHINX
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Sphinx posts

          Postman logo

          Postman

          95.1K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          95.1K
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.4M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more