Alternatives to XMPP logo

Alternatives to XMPP

MQTT, Firebase, WebRTC, Socket.IO, and SignalR are the most popular alternatives and competitors to XMPP.
66
135
+ 1
0

What is XMPP and what are its top alternatives?

XMPP, also known as Jabber, is an open-source communication protocol that enables real-time messaging, presence information, and contact list maintenance. It is decentralized and federated, allowing users to communicate across different servers. Key features of XMPP include security through end-to-end encryption, multi-platform compatibility, and support for various extensions. However, XMPP has limitations such as a lack of built-in video conferencing capabilities and a complex server setup process.

  1. Matrix: Matrix is an open network for secure, decentralized communication that offers real-time messaging, voice, and video calls. It supports end-to-end encryption, bridging capabilities, and integration with other communication platforms. Compared to XMPP, Matrix provides a more modern and seamless user experience but may require more resources for server infrastructure.
  2. Signal: Signal is a privacy-focused messaging app that offers end-to-end encryption, voice and video calls, and self-destructing messages. It provides a high level of security and privacy compared to XMPP but lacks the decentralization and server customization options of XMPP.
  3. Wire: Wire is a secure messaging platform that offers end-to-end encryption, voice and video calls, and file sharing. It provides a polished user interface and collaboration features but may not be as customizable as XMPP in terms of server setup and extensions.
  4. Rocket.Chat: Rocket.Chat is an open-source team communication platform that offers real-time messaging, video conferencing, and screen sharing. It supports self-hosting options for server deployment and customization but may require more technical knowledge compared to XMPP.
  5. Telegram: Telegram is a cloud-based messaging app with end-to-end encryption, self-destructing messages, and group chats. It provides a user-friendly interface and extensive bot integration but lacks the decentralized and federated nature of XMPP.
  6. Tox: Tox is a peer-to-peer messaging platform that offers end-to-end encryption, voice and video calls, and file sharing. It provides a high level of privacy and security but may not have as many built-in features and extensions as XMPP.
  7. Riot.im: Riot.im is a decentralized, open-source messaging app built on the Matrix protocol. It offers end-to-end encryption, cross-platform support, and integration with other communication platforms. Compared to XMPP, Riot.im provides a more streamlined user experience but may require more server resources.
  8. Zulip: Zulip is an open-source team chat platform that offers threaded conversations, file sharing, and integrations with other tools. It provides a unique conversation threading feature but may not be as customizable as XMPP in terms of server setup and extensions.
  9. Jitsi Meet: Jitsi Meet is an open-source video conferencing platform that supports end-to-end encryption, screen sharing, and chat functionality. It provides a user-friendly interface and integration with various communication platforms but may not offer as many features as XMPP for text messaging.
  10. Keybase: Keybase is a secure messaging and file sharing platform that offers end-to-end encryption, secure group chats, and integration with social media accounts. It provides a high level of security and privacy but may not have the same level of customization and extensibility as XMPP.

Top Alternatives to XMPP

  • MQTT
    MQTT

    It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • WebRTC
    WebRTC

    It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose. ...

  • Socket.IO
    Socket.IO

    It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed. ...

  • SignalR
    SignalR

    SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization. ...

  • Slack
    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • Kubernetes
    Kubernetes

    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions. ...

  • Kafka
    Kafka

    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design. ...

XMPP alternatives & related posts

MQTT logo

MQTT

592
570
7
A machine-to-machine Internet of Things connectivity protocol
592
570
+ 1
7
PROS OF MQTT
  • 3
    Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of
  • 2
    Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint
  • 2
    Very easy to configure and use with open source tools
CONS OF MQTT
  • 1
    Easy to configure in an unsecure manner

related MQTT posts

Kindly suggest the best tool for generating 10Mn+ concurrent user load. The tool must support MQTT traffic, REST API, support to interfaces such as Kafka, websockets, persistence HTTP connection, auth type support to assess the support /coverage.

The tool can be integrated into CI pipelines like Azure Pipelines, GitHub, and Jenkins.

See more
A Nielsen
Fullstack Dev at ADTELA · | 2 upvotes · 212.5K views

Hi Marc,

For the com part, depending of more details not provided, i'd use SSE, OR i'd run either Mosquitto or RabbitMQ running on Amazon EC2 instances and leverage MQTT or amqp 's subscribe/publish features with my users running mqtt or amqp clients (tcp or websockets) somehow. (publisher too.. you don't say how and who gets to update the document(s).

I find "a ton of end users", depending on how you define a ton (1k users ;) ?) and how frequent document updates are, that can mean a ton of ressources, can't cut it at some point, even using SSE

how many, how big, how persistant do the document(s) have to be ? Db-wise,can't say for lack of details and context, yeah could also be Redis, any RDBMS or nosql or even static json files stored on an Amazon S3 bucket .. anything really

Good luck!

See more
Firebase logo

Firebase

40.1K
34.4K
2K
The Realtime App Platform
40.1K
34.4K
+ 1
2K
PROS OF FIREBASE
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy
CONS OF FIREBASE
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

related Firebase posts

Stephen Gheysens
Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

See more
Tassanai Singprom

This is my stack in Application & Data

JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

My Utilities Tools

Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

My Devops Tools

Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

My Business Tools

Slack

See more
WebRTC logo

WebRTC

316
526
6
A free, open project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications
316
526
+ 1
6
PROS OF WEBRTC
  • 3
    OpenSource
  • 2
    No Download
  • 1
    You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc
CONS OF WEBRTC
    Be the first to leave a con

    related WebRTC posts

    Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

    See more
    joseph zeiad

    I am trying to implement video calling in a React Native app through Amazon Kinesis. But I was unlucky to find anything related to this on the web. Do you have any example code I can use? or any tutorial? If not, how easy is it to bridge the native library to RN? And what should I use WebRTC or Amazon Chime?? Thanks

    See more
    Socket.IO logo

    Socket.IO

    13K
    10.7K
    785
    Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)
    13K
    10.7K
    + 1
    785
    PROS OF SOCKET.IO
    • 219
      Real-time
    • 143
      Node.js
    • 141
      Event-based communication
    • 102
      Open source
    • 102
      WebSockets
    • 26
      Binary streaming
    • 21
      No internet dependency
    • 10
      Large community
    • 9
      Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
    • 6
      Push notification
    • 5
      Ease of access and setup
    • 1
      Test
    CONS OF SOCKET.IO
    • 12
      Bad documentation
    • 4
      Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
    • 3
      Doesn't work on React Native
    • 2
      Small community
    • 2
      Websocket Errors

    related Socket.IO posts

    across_the_grid
    Full-stack web developer · | 10 upvotes · 421.1K views
    Shared insights
    on
    Socket.IOSocket.IONode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJS

    I use Socket.IO because the application has 2 frontend clients, which need to communicate in real-time. The backend-server handles the communication between these two clients via websockets. Socket.io is very easy to set up in Node.js and ExpressJS.

    In the research project, the 1st client shows panoramic videos in a so called cave system (it is the VR setup of our research lab, which consists of three big screens, which are specially arranged, so the user experience the videos more immersive), the 2nd client controls the videos/locations of the 1st client.

    See more

    We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

    See more
    SignalR logo

    SignalR

    488
    1.2K
    146
    A new library for ASP.NET developers that makes developing real-time web functionality easy.
    488
    1.2K
    + 1
    146
    PROS OF SIGNALR
    • 32
      Supports .NET server
    • 25
      Real-time
    • 18
      Free
    • 16
      Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
    • 15
      WebSockets
    • 10
      Simple
    • 9
      Open source
    • 8
      Ease of use
    • 8
      JSON
    • 5
      Cool
    • 0
      Azure
    CONS OF SIGNALR
    • 2
      Expertise hard to get
    • 2
      Requires jQuery
    • 1
      Weak iOS and Android support
    • 1
      Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions

    related SignalR posts

    Shared insights
    on
    gRPCgRPCSignalRSignalR.NET.NET

    We need to interact from several different Web applications (remote) to a client-side application (.exe in .NET Framework, Windows.Console under our controlled environment). From the web applications, we need to send and receive data and invoke methods to client-side .exe on javascript events like users onclick. SignalR is one of the .Net alternatives to do that, but it adds overhead for what we need. Is it better to add SignalR at both client-side application and remote web application, or use gRPC as it sounds lightest and is multilingual?

    SignalR or gRPC are always sending and receiving data on the client-side (from browser to .exe and back to browser). And web application is used for graphical visualization of data to the user. There is no need for local .exe to send or interact with remote web API. Which architecture or framework do you suggest to use in this case?

    See more
    Slack logo

    Slack

    117.6K
    94.4K
    6K
    Bring all your communication together in one place
    117.6K
    94.4K
    + 1
    6K
    PROS OF SLACK
    • 1.2K
      Easy to integrate with
    • 876
      Excellent interface on multiple platforms
    • 849
      Free
    • 694
      Mobile friendly
    • 690
      People really enjoy using it
    • 331
      Great integrations
    • 315
      Flexible notification preferences
    • 198
      Unlimited users
    • 184
      Strong search and data archiving
    • 155
      Multi domain switching support
    • 82
      Easy to use
    • 40
      Beautiful
    • 27
      Hubot support
    • 22
      Unread/read control
    • 21
      Slackbot
    • 19
      Permalink for each messages
    • 17
      Text snippet with highlighting
    • 15
      Quote message easily
    • 14
      Per-room notification
    • 13
      Awesome integration support
    • 12
      IRC gateway
    • 12
      Star for each message / attached files
    • 11
      Good communication within a team
    • 11
      Dropbox Integration
    • 10
      Jira Integration
    • 10
      Slick, search is great
    • 9
      New Relic Integration
    • 8
      Great communication tool
    • 8
      Asana Integration
    • 8
      Combine All Services Quickly
    • 7
      Awesomeness
    • 7
      This tool understands developers
    • 7
      Google Drive Integration
    • 7
      XMPP gateway
    • 6
      Replaces email
    • 6
      Twitter Integration
    • 6
      Google Docs Integration
    • 6
      BitBucket integration
    • 5
      GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
    • 5
      Jenkins Integration
    • 5
      Guest and Restricted user control
    • 4
      Gathers all my communications in one place
    • 4
      Clean UI
    • 4
      GitHub integration
    • 4
      Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
    • 4
      Mention list view
    • 3
      Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
    • 3
      Android app
    • 3
      Visual Studio Integration
    • 3
      Easy to start working with
    • 3
      Easy
    • 3
      Easy to add a reaction
    • 3
      Timely while non intrusive
    • 3
      Great on-boarding
    • 3
      Threaded chat
    • 2
      Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
    • 2
      Message Actions
    • 2
      Simplicity
    • 2
      So much better than email
    • 2
      It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
    • 2
      Great Channel Customization
    • 2
      Great interface
    • 2
      Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
    • 2
      Markdown
    • 1
      API
    • 1
      Easy remote communication
    • 1
      Get less busy
    • 1
      Targetprocess integration
    • 1
      Better User Experience
    • 1
      Multi work-space support
    • 1
      Travis CI integration
    • 1
      It's the coolest IM ever
    • 1
      Dev communication Made Easy
    • 1
      Community
    • 1
      Integrates with just about everything
    • 1
      Great API
    • 1
      Very customizable
    • 1
      Great Support Team
    • 1
      Flexible and Accessible
    • 1
      Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
    • 1
      Archive Importing
    • 1
      Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
    • 1
      Watch
    • 1
      I was 666 star :D
    • 0
      Easy to useL
    • 0
      Platforms
    CONS OF SLACK
    • 13
      Can be distracting depending on how you use it
    • 6
      Requires some management for large teams
    • 6
      Limit messages history
    • 5
      Too expensive
    • 5
      You don't really own your messages
    • 4
      Too many notifications by default

    related Slack posts

    Lucas Litton
    Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 265K views

    Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

    See more
    Yonas Beshawred

    Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

    You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

    Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

    #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

    See more
    Kubernetes logo

    Kubernetes

    58.5K
    50.6K
    677
    Manage a cluster of Linux containers as a single system to accelerate Dev and simplify Ops
    58.5K
    50.6K
    + 1
    677
    PROS OF KUBERNETES
    • 164
      Leading docker container management solution
    • 128
      Simple and powerful
    • 106
      Open source
    • 76
      Backed by google
    • 58
      The right abstractions
    • 25
      Scale services
    • 20
      Replication controller
    • 11
      Permission managment
    • 9
      Supports autoscaling
    • 8
      Cheap
    • 8
      Simple
    • 6
      Self-healing
    • 5
      No cloud platform lock-in
    • 5
      Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
    • 5
      Open, powerful, stable
    • 5
      Reliable
    • 4
      Scalable
    • 4
      Quick cloud setup
    • 3
      Cloud Agnostic
    • 3
      Captain of Container Ship
    • 3
      A self healing environment with rich metadata
    • 3
      Runs on azure
    • 3
      Backed by Red Hat
    • 3
      Custom and extensibility
    • 2
      Sfg
    • 2
      Gke
    • 2
      Everything of CaaS
    • 2
      Golang
    • 2
      Easy setup
    • 2
      Expandable
    CONS OF KUBERNETES
    • 16
      Steep learning curve
    • 15
      Poor workflow for development
    • 8
      Orchestrates only infrastructure
    • 4
      High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
    • 2
      Too heavy for simple systems
    • 1
      Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
    • 1
      More moving parts to secure
    • 1
      Additional Technology Overhead

    related Kubernetes posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 9.6M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Yshay Yaacobi

    Our first experience with .NET core was when we developed our OSS feature management platform - Tweek (https://github.com/soluto/tweek). We wanted to create a solution that is able to run anywhere (super important for OSS), has excellent performance characteristics and can fit in a multi-container architecture. We decided to implement our rule engine processor in F# , our main service was implemented in C# and other components were built using JavaScript / TypeScript and Go.

    Visual Studio Code worked really well for us as well, it worked well with all our polyglot services and the .Net core integration had great cross-platform developer experience (to be fair, F# was a bit trickier) - actually, each of our team members used a different OS (Ubuntu, macos, windows). Our production deployment ran for a time on Docker Swarm until we've decided to adopt Kubernetes with almost seamless migration process.

    After our positive experience of running .Net core workloads in containers and developing Tweek's .Net services on non-windows machines, C# had gained back some of its popularity (originally lost to Node.js), and other teams have been using it for developing microservices, k8s sidecars (like https://github.com/Soluto/airbag), cli tools, serverless functions and other projects...

    See more
    Kafka logo

    Kafka

    23K
    21.6K
    607
    Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
    23K
    21.6K
    + 1
    607
    PROS OF KAFKA
    • 126
      High-throughput
    • 119
      Distributed
    • 92
      Scalable
    • 86
      High-Performance
    • 66
      Durable
    • 38
      Publish-Subscribe
    • 19
      Simple-to-use
    • 18
      Open source
    • 12
      Written in Scala and java. Runs on JVM
    • 9
      Message broker + Streaming system
    • 4
      KSQL
    • 4
      Avro schema integration
    • 4
      Robust
    • 3
      Suport Multiple clients
    • 2
      Extremely good parallelism constructs
    • 2
      Partioned, replayable log
    • 1
      Simple publisher / multi-subscriber model
    • 1
      Fun
    • 1
      Flexible
    CONS OF KAFKA
    • 32
      Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
    • 29
      Needs Zookeeper
    • 9
      Operational difficulties
    • 5
      Terrible Packaging

    related Kafka posts

    Eric Colson
    Chief Algorithms Officer at Stitch Fix · | 21 upvotes · 6.1M views

    The algorithms and data infrastructure at Stitch Fix is housed in #AWS. Data acquisition is split between events flowing through Kafka, and periodic snapshots of PostgreSQL DBs. We store data in an Amazon S3 based data warehouse. Apache Spark on Yarn is our tool of choice for data movement and #ETL. Because our storage layer (s3) is decoupled from our processing layer, we are able to scale our compute environment very elastically. We have several semi-permanent, autoscaling Yarn clusters running to serve our data processing needs. While the bulk of our compute infrastructure is dedicated to algorithmic processing, we also implemented Presto for adhoc queries and dashboards.

    Beyond data movement and ETL, most #ML centric jobs (e.g. model training and execution) run in a similarly elastic environment as containers running Python and R code on Amazon EC2 Container Service clusters. The execution of batch jobs on top of ECS is managed by Flotilla, a service we built in house and open sourced (see https://github.com/stitchfix/flotilla-os).

    At Stitch Fix, algorithmic integrations are pervasive across the business. We have dozens of data products actively integrated systems. That requires serving layer that is robust, agile, flexible, and allows for self-service. Models produced on Flotilla are packaged for deployment in production using Khan, another framework we've developed internally. Khan provides our data scientists the ability to quickly productionize those models they've developed with open source frameworks in Python 3 (e.g. PyTorch, sklearn), by automatically packaging them as Docker containers and deploying to Amazon ECS. This provides our data scientist a one-click method of getting from their algorithms to production. We then integrate those deployments into a service mesh, which allows us to A/B test various implementations in our product.

    For more info:

    #DataScience #DataStack #Data

    See more
    John Kodumal

    As we've evolved or added additional infrastructure to our stack, we've biased towards managed services. Most new backing stores are Amazon RDS instances now. We do use self-managed PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB for time-series data—this is made HA with the use of Patroni and Consul.

    We also use managed Amazon ElastiCache instances instead of spinning up Amazon EC2 instances to run Redis workloads, as well as shifting to Amazon Kinesis instead of Kafka.

    See more