Alternatives to Wallaby.js logo

Alternatives to Wallaby.js

Quokka, Selenium, BrowserStack, Karma, and LambdaTest are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Wallaby.js.
11
18
+ 1
0

What is Wallaby.js and what are its top alternatives?

It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.
Wallaby.js is a tool in the Browser Testing category of a tech stack.
Wallaby.js is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Wallaby.js's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Wallaby.js

  • Quokka
    Quokka

    You send great emails but sometimes it gets lost in a user’s inbox. Quokka shows a retargeting message to those who ignored your message so that they will never miss an important update from you. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • Playwright
    Playwright

    It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. ...

  • WebdriverIO
    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

Wallaby.js alternatives & related posts

Quokka logo

Quokka

3
14
0
Retarget people who missed your emails
3
14
+ 1
0
PROS OF QUOKKA
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF QUOKKA
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Quokka posts

      Selenium logo

      Selenium

      15.7K
      12.3K
      525
      Web Browser Automation
      15.7K
      12.3K
      + 1
      525
      PROS OF SELENIUM
      • 175
        Automates browsers
      • 154
        Testing
      • 101
        Essential tool for running test automation
      • 24
        Record-Playback
      • 24
        Remote Control
      • 8
        Data crawling
      • 7
        Supports end to end testing
      • 6
        Easy set up
      • 6
        Functional testing
      • 4
        The Most flexible monitoring system
      • 3
        End to End Testing
      • 3
        Easy to integrate with build tools
      • 2
        Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
      • 2
        Record and playback
      • 2
        Compatible with Python
      • 2
        Easy to scale
      • 2
        Integration Tests
      • 0
        Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
      CONS OF SELENIUM
      • 8
        Flaky tests
      • 4
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
      • 2
        Update browser drivers

      related Selenium posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.8M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Benjamin Poon
      QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1.9M views

      For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

      With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

      See more
      Karma logo

      Karma

      4.7K
      602
      181
      Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
      4.7K
      602
      + 1
      181
      PROS OF KARMA
      • 61
        Test Runner
      • 35
        Open source
      • 27
        Continuous Integration
      • 22
        Great for running tests
      • 18
        Test on Real Devices
      • 11
        Backed by google
      • 5
        Easy Debugging
      • 2
        Remote Control
      CONS OF KARMA
      • 1
        Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
      • 1
        Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

      related Karma posts

      Sai Chaitanya Mankala
      Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 859.6K views

      Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

      We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

      See more

      Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

      Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

      See more
      BrowserStack logo

      BrowserStack

      2.7K
      2K
      498
      BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, & optimize...
      2.7K
      2K
      + 1
      498
      PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
      • 134
        Multiple browsers
      • 75
        Ease of use
      • 63
        Real browsers
      • 43
        Ability to use it locally
      • 26
        Good price
      • 20
        Great web interface
      • 18
        IE support
      • 16
        Official mobile emulators
      • 14
        Instant access
      • 14
        Cloud-based access
      • 11
        Real mobile devices
      • 7
        Selenium compatible
      • 7
        Screenshots
      • 7
        Multiple Desktop OS
      • 6
        Can be used for Testing and E2E
      • 5
        Pre-installed developer tools
      • 4
        Video of test runs
      • 3
        Webdriver compatible
      • 3
        Many browsers
      • 3
        Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
      • 3
        Favourites
      • 2
        Cypress Compatible
      • 2
        Test automation dashboard
      • 2
        Unify and track test cases
      • 2
        Free for Open Source
      • 2
        Test Management
      • 2
        Cross-browser testing
      • 2
        Bi-directional Jira Sync
      • 1
        Speed is fast
      • 1
        Real devices
      • 0
        Web accessibility
      • 0
        Test WCAG Compliance
      • 0
        Visual testing and review
      CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
      • 2
        Very limited choice of minor versions

      related BrowserStack posts

      Zarema Khalilova
      Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 292.2K views

      I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

      See more
      LambdaTest logo

      LambdaTest

      557
      198
      204
      LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
      557
      198
      + 1
      204
      PROS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 17
        Pocket friendly pricing
      • 13
        Good Performance
      • 12
        Integration with Gitlab
      • 12
        Integration with Bitbucket
      • 12
        Cross browser testing
      • 11
        Integration with Jira
      • 11
        Great support
      • 11
        Integration with GitHub
      • 10
        Integration with Trello
      • 10
        Clean UI and Easy to use
      • 10
        Integration with Slack
      • 10
        Integration with Asana
      • 8
        Pre-installed developer tools
      • 8
        Integration with Hive
      • 8
        IE and Edge support
      • 6
        Local app testing
      • 6
        Multiple Browsers
      • 5
        Integration with Teamwork
      • 5
        Integration with VSTS
      • 4
        Real time testing feature is flawless
      • 3
        Selenium automation
      • 3
        Faster Speed
      • 3
        Up-to-date Browser collection
      • 2
        Robust Selenium Grid
      • 2
        Real devices
      • 2
        24/7 Customer Chat Support
      CONS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 1
        Cluttered UI
      • 1
        Steep learning curve for new users
      • 1
        Limited device support

      related LambdaTest posts

      Sarah Elson
      Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 754.6K views

      @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

      See more
      Sarah Elson
      Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127K views
      Shared insights
      on
      SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
      at
      Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

      Selenium LambdaTest

      See more
      LambdaTest logo

      LambdaTest

      557
      198
      204
      LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
      557
      198
      + 1
      204
      PROS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 17
        Pocket friendly pricing
      • 13
        Good Performance
      • 12
        Integration with Gitlab
      • 12
        Integration with Bitbucket
      • 12
        Cross browser testing
      • 11
        Integration with Jira
      • 11
        Great support
      • 11
        Integration with GitHub
      • 10
        Integration with Trello
      • 10
        Clean UI and Easy to use
      • 10
        Integration with Slack
      • 10
        Integration with Asana
      • 8
        Pre-installed developer tools
      • 8
        Integration with Hive
      • 8
        IE and Edge support
      • 6
        Local app testing
      • 6
        Multiple Browsers
      • 5
        Integration with Teamwork
      • 5
        Integration with VSTS
      • 4
        Real time testing feature is flawless
      • 3
        Selenium automation
      • 3
        Faster Speed
      • 3
        Up-to-date Browser collection
      • 2
        Robust Selenium Grid
      • 2
        Real devices
      • 2
        24/7 Customer Chat Support
      CONS OF LAMBDATEST
      • 1
        Cluttered UI
      • 1
        Steep learning curve for new users
      • 1
        Limited device support

      related LambdaTest posts

      Sarah Elson
      Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 754.6K views

      @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

      See more
      Sarah Elson
      Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127K views
      Shared insights
      on
      SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
      at
      Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

      Selenium LambdaTest

      See more
      Playwright logo

      Playwright

      450
      531
      76
      Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft)
      450
      531
      + 1
      76
      PROS OF PLAYWRIGHT
      • 13
        Cross browser
      • 10
        Open source
      • 9
        Test Runner with Playwright/test
      • 7
        Promise based
      • 7
        Well documented
      • 5
        Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
      • 5
        Execute tests in parallel
      • 5
        API Testing
      • 4
        Python Support
      • 4
        Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
      • 3
        Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
      • 3
        Context isolation
      • 1
        Fastest
      CONS OF PLAYWRIGHT
      • 12
        Less help
      • 3
        Node based
      • 2
        Does not execute outside of browser

      related Playwright posts

      Lily Goykhman
      Engineering management at SB · | 3 upvotes · 24.9K views
      Shared insights
      on
      PlaywrightPlaywrightPuppeteerPuppeteer

      Test automation - Puppeteer is used currently, just rudimentary stuff, but considering the better choices with Playwright?

      See more

      We are planning to automate our test cases for the application written in AngularJS. Which tool would you suggest we use for automation, Playwright or WebdriverIO?

      See more
      WebdriverIO logo

      WebdriverIO

      417
      502
      40
      Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
      417
      502
      + 1
      40
      PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
      • 11
        Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
      • 10
        Open Source
      • 8
        Great community
      • 7
        Easy to setup
      • 4
        Best solution for broad browser support
      CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
      • 8
        High maintenance

      related WebdriverIO posts

      Raziel Alron
      Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 2M views

      Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

      See more
      Kevin Roulleau
      QA Engineer Freelance at happn · | 5 upvotes · 989.1K views

      I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

      See more