Alternatives to Waitress logo

Alternatives to Waitress

Gunicorn, uWSGI, Flask, NGINX, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Waitress.
16
57
+ 1
7

What is Waitress and what are its top alternatives?

Waitress is a lightweight WSGI server implementation in Python that is designed to be simple, efficient, and easy to use. It supports multiple threads, processes, and asynchronous request handling, making it suitable for a wide range of web applications. However, Waitress may not be suitable for high-traffic websites or applications that require advanced features such as load balancing or clustering.

  1. Gunicorn: Gunicorn is a popular WSGI server for Python web applications known for its speed and scalability. It supports multiple worker processes, graceful reloading, and SSL support. Pros: Fast and reliable performance, easy to use. Cons: May require more configuration compared to Waitress.
  2. uWSGI: uWSGI is a versatile WSGI server that supports various protocols and interfaces, including WSGI, HTTP, and FastCGI. It offers advanced features like process management, caching, and routing. Pros: High performance, extensive feature set. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Waitress.
  3. CherryPy: CherryPy is a minimalist Python web framework and WSGI server that aims to be easy to use and efficient. It provides a built-in HTTP server for development and testing purposes. Pros: Lightweight, easy to get started. Cons: Limited scalability for high-traffic websites.
  4. Starlette: Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework for building asynchronous web applications in Python. It offers high performance, WebSocket support, and easy integration with other ASGI servers like Uvicorn. Pros: Asynchronous request handling, modern and flexible design. Cons: May require familiarity with asynchronous programming concepts.
  5. Daphne: Daphne is an ASGI server that is optimized for Django applications. It supports HTTP and WebSocket protocols, making it suitable for real-time web applications. Pros: Integration with Django, high performance for asynchronous tasks. Cons: Limited support for non-Django projects.
  6. Tornado: Tornado is a scalable and non-blocking web server and framework for Python. It is known for its high performance, WebSocket support, and asynchronous I/O capabilities. Pros: High concurrency, built-in support for long polling. Cons: Requires understanding of asynchronous programming concepts.
  7. Twisted: Twisted is an event-driven networking engine for Python that can be used to build servers, clients, and protocols. It supports asynchronous I/O, SSL encryption, and various network protocols. Pros: Extensive protocol support, robust event-driven architecture. Cons: Complex API compared to other WSGI servers.
  8. Bjoern: Bjoern is a fast and efficient WSGI server written in C for Python web applications. It is designed for high concurrency and performance, making it suitable for handling heavy workloads. Pros: High performance, low resource consumption. Cons: Limited features compared to more fully-featured WSGI servers.
  9. Hypercorn: Hypercorn is an ASGI server based on the popular ASGI framework, asyncio. It supports HTTP, WebSockets, and proxying with a focus on scalability and performance. Pros: Easy integration with ASGI applications, high performance for handling asynchronous requests. Cons: Requires familiarity with asyncio and ASGI concepts.
  10. PyWsgi: PyWsgi is a lightweight and easy-to-use WSGI server for Python web applications. It is designed to be simple and minimalistic, making it a good choice for small projects or development environments. Pros: Simple setup, minimalistic design. Cons: Limited features compared to more advanced WSGI servers.

Top Alternatives to Waitress

  • Gunicorn
    Gunicorn

    Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy. ...

  • uWSGI
    uWSGI

    The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services. ...

  • Flask
    Flask

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind. ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • Owin
    Owin

    It is a standard for an interface between .NET Web applications and Web servers. It is a community-owned open-source project. ...

  • Xen Orchestra
    Xen Orchestra

    It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs. ...

  • Werbot
    Werbot

    It is basically a platform for storing, sharing, and managing server access. But the most valuable part of it concerns the possibility to do an audit and to control the work performed on the server. Our platform can be integrated as an independent service in company infrastructure. It doesn’t change the way developers are used to working on the server, it changes the way they connect on it. All connections to servers are made through a single sign-on and private user access. All the actions performed on servers and in Werbot web interface are logged and recorded (screencasts). The server administrator can not only see what was done on the server by each user and when it was done but also can replay the whole working session in our player. The server audit is made much easier with Werbot. ...

Waitress alternatives & related posts

Gunicorn logo

Gunicorn

1.1K
897
78
A Python WSGI HTTP Server for UNIX
1.1K
897
+ 1
78
PROS OF GUNICORN
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Light
  • 3
    Fast
CONS OF GUNICORN
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Gunicorn posts

    Pierre Chapuis

    Unlike our frontend, we chose Flask, a microframework, for our backend. We use it with Python 3 and Gunicorn.

    One of the reasons was that I have significant experience with this framework. However, it also was a rather straightforward choice given that our backend almost only serves REST APIs, and that most of the work is talking to the database with SQLAlchemy .

    We could have gone with something like Hug but it is kind of early. We might revisit that decision for new services later on.

    See more

    I use Gunicorn because does one thing - it’s a WSGI HTTP server - and it does it well. Deploy it quickly and easily, and let the rest of your stack do what the rest of your stack does well, wherever that may be.

    uWSGI “aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services” - if that’s a thing you need then ok, but I like the principle of doing one thing well, and I deploy to platforms like Heroku and AWS Elastic Beanstalk where the rest of the “hosting service” is provided and managed for me.

    See more
    uWSGI logo

    uWSGI

    254
    312
    12
    uWSGI application server container
    254
    312
    + 1
    12
    PROS OF UWSGI
    • 6
      Faster
    • 4
      Simple
    • 2
      Powerful
    CONS OF UWSGI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related uWSGI posts

      I find I really like using GitHub because its issue tracker integrates really well into my project flow and the projects feature allows me to organize different efforts into boards. The automation features allow my issues to automatically progress through some states on the boards when I merge pull requests.

      My Python / Django app is deployed on Heroku with PostgreSQL database and uWSGI webserver.

      See more

      I use Gunicorn because does one thing - it’s a WSGI HTTP server - and it does it well. Deploy it quickly and easily, and let the rest of your stack do what the rest of your stack does well, wherever that may be.

      uWSGI “aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services” - if that’s a thing you need then ok, but I like the principle of doing one thing well, and I deploy to platforms like Heroku and AWS Elastic Beanstalk where the rest of the “hosting service” is provided and managed for me.

      See more
      Flask logo

      Flask

      18.7K
      15.8K
      82
      A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
      18.7K
      15.8K
      + 1
      82
      PROS OF FLASK
      • 14
        Flexibilty
      • 10
        For it flexibility
      • 9
        Flexibilty and easy to use
      • 8
        Flask
      • 7
        User friendly
      • 6
        Secured
      • 5
        Unopinionated
      • 3
        Orm
      • 2
        Secure
      • 1
        Beautiful code
      • 1
        Easy to get started
      • 1
        Easy to develop and maintain applications
      • 1
        Not JS
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 1
        Documentation
      • 1
        Python
      • 1
        Minimal
      • 1
        Lightweight
      • 1
        Easy to setup and get it going
      • 1
        Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
      • 1
        Easy to integrate
      • 1
        Speed
      • 1
        Get started quickly
      • 1
        Customizable
      • 1
        Simple to use
      • 1
        Powerful
      • 1
        Rapid development
      • 0
        Open source
      • 0
        Well designed
      • 0
        Productive
      • 0
        Awesome
      • 0
        Expressive
      • 0
        Love it
      CONS OF FLASK
      • 10
        Not JS
      • 7
        Context
      • 5
        Not fast
      • 1
        Don't has many module as in spring

      related Flask posts

      James Man
      Software Engineer at Pinterest · | 45 upvotes · 2.8M views
      Shared insights
      on
      FlaskFlaskReactReact
      at

      One of our top priorities at Pinterest is fostering a safe and trustworthy experience for all Pinners. As Pinterest’s user base and ads business grow, the review volume has been increasing exponentially, and more content types require moderation support. To solve greater engineering and operational challenges at scale, we needed a highly-reliable and performant system to detect, report, evaluate, and act on abusive content and users and so we created Pinqueue.

      Pinqueue-3.0 serves as a generic platform for content moderation and human labeling. Under the hood, Pinqueue3.0 is a Flask + React app powered by Pinterest’s very own Gestalt UI framework. On the backend, Pinqueue3.0 heavily relies on PinLater, a Pinterest-built reliable asynchronous job execution system, to handle the requests for enqueueing and action-taking. Using PinLater has significantly strengthened Pinqueue3.0’s overall infra with its capability of processing a massive load of events with configurable retry policies.

      Hundreds of millions of people around the world use Pinterest to discover and do what they love, and our job is to protect them from abusive and harmful content. We’re committed to providing an inspirational yet safe experience to all Pinners. Solving trust & safety problems is a joint effort requiring expertise across multiple domains. Pinqueue3.0 not only plays a critical role in responsively taking down unsafe content, it also has become an enabler for future ML/automation initiatives by providing high-quality human labels. Going forward, we will continue to improve the review experience, measure review quality and collaborate with our machine learning teams to solve content moderation beyond manual reviews at an even larger scale.

      See more

      Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

      See more
      NGINX logo

      NGINX

      112.1K
      59.9K
      5.5K
      A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
      112.1K
      59.9K
      + 1
      5.5K
      PROS OF NGINX
      • 1.4K
        High-performance http server
      • 893
        Performance
      • 730
        Easy to configure
      • 607
        Open source
      • 530
        Load balancer
      • 288
        Free
      • 288
        Scalability
      • 225
        Web server
      • 175
        Simplicity
      • 136
        Easy setup
      • 30
        Content caching
      • 21
        Web Accelerator
      • 15
        Capability
      • 14
        Fast
      • 12
        High-latency
      • 12
        Predictability
      • 8
        Reverse Proxy
      • 7
        The best of them
      • 7
        Supports http/2
      • 5
        Great Community
      • 5
        Lots of Modules
      • 5
        Enterprise version
      • 4
        High perfomance proxy server
      • 3
        Reversy Proxy
      • 3
        Streaming media delivery
      • 3
        Streaming media
      • 3
        Embedded Lua scripting
      • 2
        GRPC-Web
      • 2
        Blash
      • 2
        Lightweight
      • 2
        Fast and easy to set up
      • 2
        Slim
      • 2
        saltstack
      • 1
        Virtual hosting
      • 1
        Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
      • 1
        Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
      • 1
        Ingress controller
      CONS OF NGINX
      • 10
        Advanced features require subscription

      related NGINX posts

      Recently I have been working on an open source stack to help people consolidate their personal health data in a single database so that AI and analytics apps can be run against it to find personalized treatments. We chose to go with a #containerized approach leveraging Docker #containers with a local development environment setup with Docker Compose and nginx for container routing. For the production environment we chose to pull code from GitHub and build/push images using Jenkins and using Kubernetes to deploy to Amazon EC2.

      We also implemented a dashboard app to handle user authentication/authorization, as well as a custom SSO server that runs on Heroku which allows experts to easily visit more than one instance without having to login repeatedly. The #Backend was implemented using my favorite #Stack which consists of FeathersJS on top of Node.js and ExpressJS with PostgreSQL as the main database. The #Frontend was implemented using React, Redux.js, Semantic UI React and the FeathersJS client. Though testing was light on this project, we chose to use AVA as well as ESLint to keep the codebase clean and consistent.

      See more

      Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

      See more
      Owin logo

      Owin

      197
      21
      0
      A standard interface between .NET web servers and web applications
      197
      21
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF OWIN
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF OWIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Owin posts

          Xen Orchestra logo

          Xen Orchestra

          13
          19
          0
          The Web Interface for XenServer
          13
          19
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF XEN ORCHESTRA
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF XEN ORCHESTRA
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Xen Orchestra posts

              Werbot logo

              Werbot

              2
              4
              0
              Easy and secure sharing of server access
              2
              4
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF WERBOT
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF WERBOT
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Werbot posts