Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Teletype for Atom vs Visual Studio Live Share: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share
Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share are both collaboration extensions that allow developers to code together in real-time. However, there are several key differences between the two.
Installation and Compatibility: Teletype for Atom is built specifically for the Atom text editor, whereas Visual Studio Live Share is a feature of the Visual Studio IDE. Teletype can be used on any operating system supported by Atom, whereas Live Share is primarily designed for Windows but also supports macOS and Linux.
Collaboration Modes: Teletype for Atom primarily focuses on shared editing, allowing multiple users to work on the same file simultaneously. It provides a "host" and "guest" concept where the host shares their workspace and the guest joins it. On the other hand, Visual Studio Live Share offers a broader range of collaboration features including shared debugging, terminals, and server forwarding, in addition to shared editing.
Guest Access: Teletype for Atom does not require guest users to have the extension installed. They can access the collaboration session through a unique URL shared by the host. In contrast, Visual Studio Live Share requires all participants to have the extension installed in their respective IDEs in order to collaborate.
Security Model: Teletype for Atom uses end-to-end encryption when sharing code, ensuring that only authorized participants can see the content. Visual Studio Live Share also provides a secure connection, but the specifics of its security model are less transparent and may rely on the security measures of the underlying Visual Studio IDE and its remote server.
Supported Languages and Frameworks: Both Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share support multiple programming languages, but Visual Studio Live Share has broader support for various frameworks and tools. It offers features like language services, IntelliSense, and debugging for a wide range of languages and frameworks, which may provide a more streamlined collaborative development experience.
Integration with Other Tools: Visual Studio Live Share integrates seamlessly with other Visual Studio extensions and tools. It leverages the rich ecosystem of Visual Studio, allowing users to work with their preferred extensions and customizations. Teletype for Atom, being a standalone extension, may have limited integration capabilities with external tools and extensions.
In Summary, Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share differ in terms of installation and compatibility, collaboration modes, guest access, security model, language and framework support, and integration with other tools.
We're doing weekend hackathons with customers to help them implement our API faster. So, I'm searching for a great remote pair programming tool with seamless onboarding/set-up. Want it to be as close to a Collison Install ("hand me your laptop, and I'll install Stripe right now") experience as possible.
Has anyone used GitDuck, Tuple, etc. for something like this? I would love suggestions.
Gitduck is multiIDE (VSC is obviously not) and includes video/audio conferencing, so it solves several issues at once. Installation of the plugin is not difficult (search in the IDE plugin store, install, then click on a link you send them to join the pair programming room).
Hope it helps!
Pros of Teletype for Atom
- GitHub Integration2
Pros of Visual Studio Live Share
- Terminal sharing4
- Server sharing3
- Port sharing3
- Real-time2
- IntelliSense Completion2
- Files sync2
- Workspace sync1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Teletype for Atom
Cons of Visual Studio Live Share
- No Read Only sharing1