StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Secrets Management
  4. Secrets Management
  5. Surge vs Vault

Surge vs Vault

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vault
Vault
Stacks816
Followers802
Votes71
GitHub Stars33.4K
Forks4.5K
Surge
Surge
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes60

Surge vs Vault: What are the differences?

 
  1. 1. Authentication and Authorization: The key difference between Surge and Vault lies in their approach to authentication and authorization. Surge is designed to provide a lightweight and simple solution for authenticating and authorizing users. It focuses on minimizing the overhead and complexity associated with authentication and authorization processes. On the other hand, Vault is a more comprehensive and advanced tool that offers a wide range of features for secure authentication and authorization. It provides robust mechanisms for authentication, such as multi-factor authentication and integration with external identity providers, making it suitable for organizations with more complex security requirements.

  2. 2. Data Encryption: Surge and Vault also differ in their approach to data encryption. Surge primarily focuses on securing data at rest by providing encryption capabilities for stored data. It ensures that sensitive information remains protected even if unauthorized access occurs. Vault, on the other hand, goes beyond data encryption at rest and provides end-to-end encryption for data in transit as well. It offers secure communication channels and encryption protocols to protect data while it is being transferred between different systems or components. This comprehensive encryption approach makes Vault a more suitable choice for organizations that prioritize data security and privacy.

  3. 3. Secret Management: Another significant difference between Surge and Vault lies in their secret management capabilities. Surge offers basic secret management functionalities, allowing users to store and retrieve secrets securely. It provides a straightforward and easy-to-use interface for managing secrets, making it suitable for simple use cases. In contrast, Vault offers advanced secret management capabilities, such as dynamic secret generation and revocation. It allows organizations to automatically generate and revoke secrets on-demand, enhancing security and reducing the risk of secret compromise. This makes Vault a more suitable choice for organizations with complex secret management requirements.

  4. 4. Scalability and High Availability: Surge and Vault differ in their scalability and high availability capabilities. Surge is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it well-suited for smaller deployments or environments with limited resources. It can handle a moderate amount of traffic and workload with ease. In contrast, Vault is designed to be highly scalable and highly available. It can handle large-scale deployments and high traffic volumes, ensuring that the system remains operational even during peak usage periods or in the event of hardware failures. This scalability and high availability make Vault a more suitable choice for organizations that require a robust and resilient solution.

  5. 5. Integration and Ecosystem: Surge and Vault also differ in terms of their integration capabilities and ecosystem. Surge aims to provide a standalone solution for authentication and authorization, with minimal dependencies on external systems or components. It is designed to be lightweight and easy to integrate into existing infrastructure. Vault, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive ecosystem and supports seamless integration with a wide range of tools and technologies. It provides APIs, SDKs, and plugins that allow users to easily integrate Vault with other systems, making it a more versatile and extensible solution.

  6. 6. Community and Support: Surge and Vault differ in terms of their community and support. Surge has a smaller community and user base compared to Vault. This means that the availability of online resources, tutorials, and community support might be more limited for Surge. Conversely, Vault has a larger and more active community, with a wealth of online resources, documentation, and community-driven support available. This larger community and support network make Vault a more suitable choice for organizations that value community-driven knowledge sharing and rely on community support for troubleshooting and problem-solving.

In Summary, Surge offers a lightweight and simple solution for authentication and secret management, while Vault provides a comprehensive and advanced tool with features such as multi-factor authentication, end-to-end data encryption, dynamic secret management, scalability, extensive integration ecosystem, and robust community and support network.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vault
Vault
Surge
Surge

Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log.

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Secure Secret Storage: Arbitrary key/value secrets can be stored in Vault. Vault encrypts these secrets prior to writing them to persistent storage, so gaining access to the raw storage isn't enough to access your secrets. Vault can write to disk, Consul, and more.;Dynamic Secrets: Vault can generate secrets on-demand for some systems, such as AWS or SQL databases. For example, when an application needs to access an S3 bucket, it asks Vault for credentials, and Vault will generate an AWS keypair with valid permissions on demand. After creating these dynamic secrets, Vault will also automatically revoke them after the lease is up.;Data Encryption: Vault can encrypt and decrypt data without storing it. This allows security teams to define encryption parameters and developers to store encrypted data in a location such as SQL without having to design their own encryption methods.;Leasing and Renewal: All secrets in Vault have a lease associated with it. At the end of the lease, Vault will automatically revoke that secret. Clients are able to renew leases via built-in renew APIs.;Revocation: Vault has built-in support for secret revocation. Vault can revoke not only single secrets, but a tree of secrets, for example all secrets read by a specific user, or all secrets of a particular type. Revocation assists in key rolling as well as locking down systems in the case of an intrusion.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
816
Stacks
91
Followers
802
Followers
176
Votes
71
Votes
60
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Secure
  • 13
    Variety of Secret Backends
  • 11
    Very easy to set up and use
  • 8
    Dynamic secret generation
  • 5
    AuditLog
Pros
  • 18
    Free plan
  • 13
    Simple
  • 11
    Free custom domain support
  • 10
    Deployment via command line
  • 3
    Smart about urls
Cons
  • 1
    No free redirects

What are some alternatives to Vault, Surge?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Doppler

Doppler

Doppler’s developer-first security platform empowers teams to seamlessly manage, orchestrate, and govern secrets at scale.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

IBM SKLM

IBM SKLM

It centralizes, simplifies and automates the encryption key management process to help minimize risk and reduce operational costs of encryption key management. It offers secure, robust key storage, key serving and key lifecycle management for IBM and non-IBM storage solutions using the OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp