StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenium vs Webpack

Selenium vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K

Selenium vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Selenium and Webpack.

  1. Installation and Purpose: Selenium is a testing framework mainly used for automating web browsers, allowing developers to write test scripts in multiple programming languages to interact with web applications. On the other hand, Webpack is a static module bundler commonly used in web development to bundle JavaScript modules and other web assets. It helps optimize the performance and build process of web applications.

  2. Scope: Selenium focuses on automating web browsers and conducting functional testing, making it ideal for end-to-end testing scenarios. On the contrary, Webpack is primarily utilized during the development phase for bundling and optimizing web assets, enhancing the overall performance and loading time of the application.

  3. Language Compatibility: Selenium supports various programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, and JavaScript, allowing developers to choose their preferred language for writing test scripts. Webpack, on the other hand, is mainly used with JavaScript projects, as it is specifically built for bundling JavaScript modules.

  4. Integration: Selenium can be integrated with various testing frameworks, libraries, and CI/CD tools, making it compatible with different software development workflows. It can be used in combination with tools like TestNG, JUnit, and Jenkins. Webpack, on the other hand, smoothly integrates with other development tools like Babel, TypeScript, and CSS preprocessors, enabling seamless module bundling and asset optimization.

  5. Primary Usage: Selenium is primarily used for automated testing, enabling developers to simulate user interactions, validate functionalities, and ensure the application's correctness and behavior across different browsers. Webpack, on the other hand, is widely used to bundle and optimize JavaScript modules, CSS files, and other web assets. It helps reduce the number of HTTP requests and improves the performance of web applications.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Selenium has a large and active community, with extensive online documentation, resources, and support available. It has been widely adopted in the industry and has a robust ecosystem of tools and frameworks built around it. Webpack also has a thriving community, with a wide range of plugins and loaders available to extend its functionalities and meet various development needs.

In summary, Selenium is primarily used for automated testing, while Webpack is a static module bundler used during the development phase. Selenium supports multiple programming languages, integrates with various testing frameworks, and focuses on functional testing, whereas Webpack is specific to JavaScript projects, enhances performance, and facilitates optimization of web assets. Both have strong communities and ecosystems supporting their respective use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Webpack

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Webpack
Webpack

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

-
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
45.0K
Followers
12.6K
Followers
28.1K
Votes
527
Votes
752
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Webpack?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana