StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenium vs WebdriverIO

Selenium vs WebdriverIO

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Stacks426
Followers509
Votes40
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks2.6K

Selenium vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Selenium and WebdriverIO are both popular tools for automating web browsers. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Programming Language Support: Selenium supports multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, C#, and Ruby, while WebdriverIO is primarily focused on JavaScript.

  2. API Design: Selenium provides a more generic API that is consistent across different programming languages, allowing users to write tests in their preferred language. On the other hand, WebdriverIO provides a more JavaScript-centric and intuitive API.

  3. Architecture: Selenium is a standalone framework that requires additional dependencies, such as a browser-specific driver, to interact with browsers. WebdriverIO, on the other hand, includes a WebDriver implementation and eliminates the need for additional dependencies.

  4. Parallel Execution: Selenium supports parallel execution of tests across multiple browsers and platforms, which is useful for reducing test execution time. WebdriverIO also supports parallel execution but provides better out-of-the-box parallel execution capabilities.

  5. Testing Framework Integration: Selenium can be integrated with various testing frameworks, such as JUnit, TestNG, and NUnit, to structure and execute tests. WebdriverIO has built-in support for Mocha and Jasmine, making it easier to set up and run tests without the need for any external testing framework.

  6. Community Ecosystem: Selenium has a larger and more established community with a wide range of resources, documentation, and community-driven plugins. WebdriverIO has a smaller but rapidly growing community and a more concentrated ecosystem of plugins and integrations.

In summary, Selenium offers broader programming language support and a more generic API, while WebdriverIO focuses on JavaScript and provides a more intuitive API. WebdriverIO also simplifies the setup by including a WebDriver implementation and provides better out-of-the-box parallel execution capabilities. Selenium has a larger community and more resources, while WebdriverIO has a smaller but growing community with a concentrated ecosystem of plugins.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, WebdriverIO

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

-
Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
2.6K
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
426
Followers
12.6K
Followers
509
Votes
527
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 11
    Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 8
    Great community
  • 7
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Best solution for broad browser support
Cons
  • 8
    High maintenance
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Selenium, WebdriverIO?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Autify

Autify

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana