StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Shell Utilities
  5. Scoop.sh vs tmux

Scoop.sh vs tmux

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

tmux
tmux
Stacks197
Followers137
Votes2
GitHub Stars39.5K
Forks2.3K
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh
Stacks24
Followers29
Votes0

Scoop.sh vs tmux: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Scoop.sh and tmux

Scoop.sh is a command-line installer for Windows, while tmux is a terminal multiplexer for Unix-like operating systems.

  1. Installation Method: Scoop.sh allows for the easy installation and management of command-line tools on Windows, using PowerShell. On the other hand, tmux needs to be installed on Unix-like systems through package managers like apt or homebrew.

  2. Functionality: Scoop.sh focuses on installing and managing command-line tools and applications, making it ideal for developers and system administrators. Tmux, on the other hand, is a terminal multiplexer that allows users to have multiple sessions and windows within a single terminal, enhancing the productivity of developers and sysadmins.

  3. Platform Compatibility: Scoop.sh is specifically developed for Windows operating systems, supporting Windows 7 and above. Tmux, on the other hand, is designed for Unix-like systems, including Linux, macOS, and BSD.

  4. User Interface: Scoop.sh primarily operates through command-line interfaces, utilizing PowerShell syntax, making it accessible and efficient for users who prefer coding and scripting. Tmux, on the other hand, provides users with a terminal-based graphical user interface that allows them to easily manage and navigate between multiple sessions and windows.

  5. Integration with Shell: Scoop.sh integrates directly with PowerShell, allowing users to manage their installed tools and packages from within the shell environment. Tmux, on the other hand, runs as a separate process within the shell, providing an additional layer of isolation and control for managing terminal sessions.

  6. Development and Community: Scoop.sh is an open-source project developed primarily by volunteers, and its community is actively involved in enhancing its features and functionality. Tmux is also an open-source project with an active community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support.

In summary, Scoop.sh is a command-line installer focused on installing and managing tools for Windows, while tmux is a terminal multiplexer that enhances productivity on Unix-like systems by providing multiple sessions within a single terminal.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

tmux
tmux
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh

It enables a number of terminals to be created, accessed, and controlled from a single screen. tmux may be detached from a screen and continue running in the background, then later reattached.

It installs programs to your home directory by default. So you don’t need admin permissions to install programs, and you won’t see UAC popups every time you need to add or remove a program.

Allow Multiple Terminals
GUI wizard-style installers;Scriptable;Minimal amount of friction
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
197
Stacks
24
Followers
137
Followers
29
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Reliable, easy and highly customizable
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to tmux, Scoop.sh?

Starship (Shell Prompt)

Starship (Shell Prompt)

Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! The prompt shows information you need while you're working, while staying sleek and out of the way.

picocli

picocli

Library and framework for easily building professional command line applications on the JVM (Java, Groovy, Kotlin, Scala, etc). Usage help with ANSI colors. Autocomplete. Nested subcommands. Annotations and programmatic API. Easy to include as source to avoid adding dependencies. More than just a command line parser.

TortoiseSVN

TortoiseSVN

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

Oh My ZSH

Oh My ZSH

A delightful, open source, community-driven framework for managing your Zsh configuration. It comes bundled with thousands of helpful functions, helpers, plugins, themes.

Try

Try

It lets you run a command and inspect its effects before changing your live system. It uses Linux's namespaces (via unshare) and the overlayfs union filesystem.

Bash-My-AWS

Bash-My-AWS

It is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable.

navi

navi

It allows you to browse through cheatsheets (that you may write yourself or download from maintainers) and execute commands, prompting for argument values.

fzf

fzf

It is a general-purpose command-line fuzzy finder. It's an interactive Unix filter for command-line that can be used with any list; files, command history, processes, hostnames, bookmarks, git commits, etc.

Dockerized

Dockerized

Run popular command-line tools within docker. It works on Linux, MacOS, and Windows (CMD, Powershell, Git Bash). You can quickly try out command line tools without the effort of downloading and installing them.

Fig

Fig

It adds autocomplete to your terminal. As you type, it pops up subcommands, options, and contextually relevant arguments in your existing terminal on macOS.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase