StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. SAP HANA vs Snowflake

SAP HANA vs Snowflake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Stacks169
Followers148
Votes27
Snowflake
Snowflake
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes27

SAP HANA vs Snowflake: What are the differences?

Introduction

SAP HANA and Snowflake are both popular data warehousing solutions that offer various features and capabilities. However, there are key differences between these two platforms.

  1. Scalability: SAP HANA is a columnar, in-memory database that is highly scalable and can handle a large volume of data. It allows for vertical scalability by adding more resources to a single server. On the other hand, Snowflake is a cloud data platform that provides virtually unlimited scalability through a separation of compute and storage. This allows for horizontal scalability by adding or removing compute resources as needed.

  2. Architecture: SAP HANA is an on-premises or private cloud solution that requires hardware and infrastructure setup. It integrates databases, data processing, and application platforms into a single system. In contrast, Snowflake is a fully managed cloud service that eliminates the need for setting up and managing infrastructure. It is built on a multi-cluster, shared data architecture that separates storage and compute layers.

  3. Concurrency: SAP HANA allows for high concurrency and supports parallel processing, enabling multiple users to access and work with the data simultaneously. It utilizes multi-core parallel processing and in-memory computing to achieve high performance. Snowflake, on the other hand, has a completely different approach to concurrency. It uses micro-partitioning and automatic query optimization to achieve concurrent, high-performance data access. Snowflake's unique architecture allows for seamless scalability and optimization of query execution.

  4. Data Sharing: SAP HANA offers data sharing capabilities within its own ecosystem, allowing users to share data between different SAP HANA instances or environments. This enables collaboration and easy access to shared data. In contrast, Snowflake is designed for sharing data seamlessly across multiple organizations and ecosystems. It provides a secure and controlled way to share data with external parties using secure data sharing.

  5. Pricing Model: SAP HANA follows a traditional licensing model where users have to pay for licenses based on the number of users or cores. Additional costs may be incurred for hardware and infrastructure setup. On the other hand, Snowflake follows a consumption-based pricing model, where users pay for the amount of data processed and the resources utilized. This allows for cost optimization and flexibility in usage.

  6. Data Governance: SAP HANA provides robust data governance capabilities, including data classification, data lineage, and access control. It allows for fine-grained access control and auditing of data. Snowflake also provides comprehensive data governance features, including access controls, encryption, and auditing. It enables organizations to enforce data security and compliance requirements effectively.

In summary, SAP HANA is an in-memory, scalable database system that requires infrastructure setup and provides data sharing within its ecosystem. Snowflake is a fully managed, cloud-based data platform that offers virtually unlimited scalability, automatic query optimization, and seamless data sharing across ecosystems. The two platforms differ in terms of architecture, scalability, concurrency, pricing model, and data governance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Snowflake
Snowflake

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

processes transactions and analytics at the same time; built-in advanced analytics and multi-model data processing engines
-
Statistics
Stacks
169
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
148
Followers
1.2K
Votes
27
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    SQL
  • 5
    In-memory
  • 4
    Distributed
  • 4
    Performance
  • 2
    Realtime
Pros
  • 7
    Public and Private Data Sharing
  • 4
    Multicloud
  • 4
    User Friendly
  • 4
    Good Performance
  • 3
    Great Documentation
Integrations
Python
Python
Power BI
Power BI
Tableau
Tableau
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
Looker
Looker
Periscope
Periscope
Mode
Mode

What are some alternatives to SAP HANA, Snowflake?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase