StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. kaminari vs will_paginate

kaminari vs will_paginate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

kaminari
kaminari
Stacks162
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.1K
will_paginate
will_paginate
Stacks214
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.7K
Forks891

kaminari vs will_paginate: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between two popular pagination libraries: kaminari and will_paginate. These libraries are used in web development to separate large datasets into multiple pages, enhancing the user experience and improving performance. Below are the key differences between the two libraries.

  1. Installation and Compatibility: Kaminari is compatible with both Rails and Sinatra frameworks, while will_paginate is primarily designed for Rails applications only. Kaminari can be installed as a gem in your project, while will_paginate requires manual installation by adding it to your Gemfile.

  2. Syntax and Functionality: Kaminari utilizes a chaining syntax to paginate ActiveRecord queries, whereas will_paginate uses a method-based syntax. Kaminari provides more advanced features such as customizable views and AJAX support out of the box, while will_paginate requires additional setup for these functionalities.

  3. Customization: Kaminari offers more customization options for pagination, allowing developers to define their own CSS classes, modify the default views, and implement custom pagination styles. Will_paginate also provides some customization options, but the level of control is not as extensive as Kaminari.

  4. Query Compatibility: While both libraries work well with regular ActiveRecord queries, Kaminari has better compatibility with more complex queries involving joins, eager loading, and scopes. Will_paginate may require additional modifications or the use of specific ActiveRecord methods to handle these situations.

  5. ActiveRecord Relation: Kaminari seamlessly integrates with ActiveRecord relations, allowing pagination directly on query results. Will_paginate, on the other hand, operates on arrays, which means it requires additional steps to paginate query results.

  6. Pagination UI: Kaminari provides a clean and modern pagination UI by default, whereas will_paginate has a more basic and generic UI. Kaminari's default styling is more appealing and easily customizable, while will_paginate requires more manual CSS modifications to achieve a desired UI.

In summary, kaminari and will_paginate differ in terms of compatibility, syntax, customization options, query compatibility, integration with ActiveRecord relations, and pagination UI. While both libraries serve the purpose of pagination effectively, kaminari offers a more comprehensive and customizable solution for handling pagination in web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

kaminari
kaminari
will_paginate
will_paginate

Kaminari is a Scope & Engine based, clean, powerful, agnostic, customizable and sophisticated paginator for Rails 4+.

Will_paginate provides a simple API for performing paginated queries with Active Record, DataMapper and Sequel, and includes helpers for rendering pagination links in Rails, Sinatra, Hanami, and Merb web apps.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Stars
5.7K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
891
Stacks
162
Stacks
214
Followers
0
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to kaminari, will_paginate?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

pry

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

byebug

byebug

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase