StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. jwt vs oauth

jwt vs oauth

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

oauth
oauth
Stacks16
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars665
Forks277
jwt
jwt
Stacks203
Followers32
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks380

jwt vs oauth: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between JWT and OAuth are outlined below:

1. **Token Format**: JWT (JSON Web Token) is a compact, self-contained token format that contains all necessary information about the user in the token itself, while OAuth (Open Authorization) is an authorization framework that enables third-party applications to obtain limited access to an HTTP service.
2. **Authentication vs Authorization**: JWT is mainly used for user authentication, where the server verifies the token to ensure the identity of the user, whereas OAuth is primarily used for authorization, allowing a third-party application to access resources on behalf of the user after the user grants permission.
3. **Stateless vs Stateful**: JWT is stateless, meaning the server does not need to store the token once created, leading to scalability and performance advantages, while OAuth is stateful, as it involves the server maintaining the session state for each request.
4. **Token Scope**: JWT typically has a broader scope, encompassing various user information and claims in a single token, while OAuth tokens are more focused on specific scopes or permissions granted for a particular resource or action.
5. **Single vs Multi-Purpose**: JWT is typically used for single sign-on (SSO) scenarios where a user logs in once and can access multiple services seamlessly, while OAuth is designed for granting limited access permissions to third-party applications without sharing user credentials.
6. **Usage Scenarios**: JWT is commonly used in modern web applications where user authentication is crucial, while OAuth is widely adopted in APIs and microservices architecture to enable secure, delegated access control.

In Summary, JWT and OAuth differ in token format, authentication vs authorization, statelessness vs statefulness, token scope, purpose, and usage scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

oauth
oauth
jwt
jwt

OAuth Core Ruby implementation.

A pure ruby implementation of the RFC 7519 OAuth JSON Web Token (JWT) standard.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
665
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Forks
277
GitHub Forks
380
Stacks
16
Stacks
203
Followers
1
Followers
32
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to oauth, jwt?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

pry

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

byebug

byebug

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase