Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ruby vs Stan: What are the differences?
Ruby: A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity. Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming; Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. A state-of-the-art platform for statistical modeling and high-performance statistical computation. Used for statistical modeling, data analysis, and prediction in the social, biological, and physical sciences, engineering, and business.
Ruby and Stan are primarily classified as "Languages" and "Machine Learning" tools respectively.
Ruby and Stan are both open source tools. Ruby with 15.9K GitHub stars and 4.26K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Stan with 1.61K GitHub stars and 279 GitHub forks.
In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.
To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.
Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.
For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.
That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.
We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.
As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.
In December we successfully flipped around half a billion monthly API requests from our Ruby on Rails application to some new Python 3 applications. Our Head of Engineering has written a great article as to why we decided to transition from Ruby on Rails to Python 3! Read more about it in the link below.
When I was evaluating languages to write this app in, I considered either Python or JavaScript at the time. I find Ruby very pleasant to read and write, and the Ruby community has built out a wide variety of test tools and approaches, helping e deliver better software faster. Along with Rails, and the Ruby-first Heroku support, this was an easy decision.
Pros of Ruby
- Programme friendly598
- Quick to develop532
- Great community488
- Productivity466
- Simplicity430
- Open source272
- Meta-programming234
- Powerful203
- Blocks157
- Powerful one-liners138
- Flexible65
- Easy to learn56
- Easy to start48
- Maintainability40
- Lambdas36
- Procs30
- Fun to write19
- Diverse web frameworks19
- Reads like English11
- Rails8
- Makes me smarter and happier8
- Elegant syntax7
- Very Dynamic6
- Programmer happiness5
- Matz5
- Generally fun but makes you wanna cry sometimes4
- Fun and useful4
- Friendly3
- Object Oriented3
- There are so many ways to make it do what you want3
- Easy packaging and modules2
- Primitive types can be tampered with2
- Elegant code2
Pros of Stan
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ruby
- Memory hog7
- Really slow if you're not really careful7
- Nested Blocks can make code unreadable3
- Encouraging imperative programming2
- Ambiguous Syntax, such as function parentheses1