StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. RocketChat vs Total.js Messenger

RocketChat vs Total.js Messenger

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RocketChat
RocketChat
Stacks367
Followers542
Votes324
GitHub Stars43.8K
Forks12.4K
Total.js Messenger
Total.js Messenger
Stacks1
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

RocketChat vs Total.js Messenger: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with other tools: RocketChat provides more integrations with third-party tools and services compared to Total.js Messenger, allowing users to connect with a wider range of applications seamlessly.

  2. Customization and flexibility: Total.js Messenger offers more customization options and flexibility in terms of design, themes, and features, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs and preferences more extensively than RocketChat.

  3. Performance and scalability: RocketChat is known for its superior performance and scalability, especially in large organizations or enterprises with high user volumes, making it a more suitable choice for businesses with demanding requirements in these areas.

  4. Security features: Total.js Messenger offers more advanced security features and compliance options, ensuring data protection and privacy for its users, making it a preferred choice for organizations with strict security protocols and regulations to comply with.

  5. Community support and development: RocketChat has a larger and more active community of developers and users, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support options for users, making it easier to find solutions to issues and expand the platform's functionality.

  6. Ease of use and user interface: Total.js Messenger is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it a more suitable option for users with limited technical knowledge or experience, who prefer a straightforward and intuitive platform.

In Summary, RocketChat and Total.js Messenger differ in terms of integration, customization, performance, security, community support, and user-friendliness, catering to different user needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RocketChat, Total.js Messenger

Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments
Christopher
Christopher

CEO at TheBig3

Feb 8, 2021

Decided

Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.

Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.

The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.

48.2k views48.2k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RocketChat
RocketChat
Total.js Messenger
Total.js Messenger

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Messenger is an open-source web application and it's a small alternative to Slack. Total.js messenger is powerful micro application for each company with open source-code.

BYOS (bring your own server);Multiple Rooms;Direct Messages;Private Groups;Public Channels;Desktop Notifications;Mentions;Avatars;Markdown;Emojis;Transcripts / History;I18n - Internationalization
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43.8K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
12.4K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
367
Stacks
1
Followers
542
Followers
19
Votes
324
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 72
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
Cons
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it
  • 1
    Mobile app in Enterprise version only
  • 1
    No full markdown support
  • 1
    Hard to upgrade
  • 1
    Poor user customization
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitLab
GitLab
Prometheus
Prometheus
Jira
Jira
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Hubot
Hubot
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to RocketChat, Total.js Messenger?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack