Rocket vs Vapor

Overview

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

Rocket vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Execution Model: Rocket uses a synchronous blocking I/O model where each request is handled by a separate thread. In contrast, Vapor utilizes an asynchronous non-blocking I/O model based on Apple's SwiftNIO framework, which allows for more efficient handling of a large number of concurrent connections.
Templating: Rocket relies on external templating engines such as Askama or tera for creating dynamic HTML content, requiring additional setup and dependencies. On the other hand, Vapor has its own native templating language called Leaf, which simplifies the process of generating dynamic content within the framework itself.
ORM Support: Rocket offers built-in support for the Diesel ORM, providing a robust way to interact with databases through Rust code. Vapor, however, has a more modular approach to ORM support, allowing developers to choose from various libraries such as Fluent or Vapor's own Fluent ORM for database interactions.
Middleware: Rocket has a more limited selection of built-in middleware compared to Vapor, which provides a wide range of middleware options out of the box such as CORS, sessions, and authentication. This difference in middleware availability can impact the ease of implementing common web application features in the two frameworks.
Community and Ecosystem: Vapor has a larger and more active community compared to Rocket, resulting in more third-party packages, resources, and support available for developers using the framework. This broader ecosystem can be advantageous for developers looking to leverage existing tools and solutions in their projects.
Learning Curve: Rocket's API design tends to be more explicit and verbose, which can make it easier for beginners to understand and work with. In contrast, Vapor's more concise and expressive API might have a steeper learning curve for newcomers but can lead to more concise and elegant code once mastered.

In Summary, Rocket and Vapor differ in their execution models, templating support, ORM options, middleware availability, community involvement, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vapor	Rocket
Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.	Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive	From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
Stacks 117	Stacks 91
Followers 217	Followers 176
Votes 65	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Readable Cons 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy 1 Not as much support available.	Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Provides nice abstractions 1 Inbuilt templating feature 1 Django analog in rust Cons 1 Only runs in nightly
Integrations
Swift	Rust

What are some alternatives to Vapor, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Rocket vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Execution Model: Rocket uses a synchronous blocking I/O model where each request is handled by a separate thread. In contrast, Vapor utilizes an asynchronous non-blocking I/O model based on Apple's SwiftNIO framework, which allows for more efficient handling of a large number of concurrent connections.
Templating: Rocket relies on external templating engines such as Askama or tera for creating dynamic HTML content, requiring additional setup and dependencies. On the other hand, Vapor has its own native templating language called Leaf, which simplifies the process of generating dynamic content within the framework itself.
ORM Support: Rocket offers built-in support for the Diesel ORM, providing a robust way to interact with databases through Rust code. Vapor, however, has a more modular approach to ORM support, allowing developers to choose from various libraries such as Fluent or Vapor's own Fluent ORM for database interactions.
Middleware: Rocket has a more limited selection of built-in middleware compared to Vapor, which provides a wide range of middleware options out of the box such as CORS, sessions, and authentication. This difference in middleware availability can impact the ease of implementing common web application features in the two frameworks.
Community and Ecosystem: Vapor has a larger and more active community compared to Rocket, resulting in more third-party packages, resources, and support available for developers using the framework. This broader ecosystem can be advantageous for developers looking to leverage existing tools and solutions in their projects.
Learning Curve: Rocket's API design tends to be more explicit and verbose, which can make it easier for beginners to understand and work with. In contrast, Vapor's more concise and expressive API might have a steeper learning curve for newcomers but can lead to more concise and elegant code once mastered.

In Summary, Rocket and Vapor differ in their execution models, templating support, ORM options, middleware availability, community involvement, and learning curve.

Rocket vs Vapor

Overview