ReadMe Build vs Rest.li

Overview

Rest.li

Stacks14

Followers39

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.5K

Forks556

ReadMe Build

Stacks3

Followers14

Votes0

ReadMe Build vs Rest.li: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between ReadMe Build and Rest.li.

Target Audience: ReadMe Build is ideal for developers looking to quickly create beautiful documentation websites, while Rest.li is a framework designed for building scalable RESTful APIs at LinkedIn.
Focus: ReadMe Build focuses on creating appealing and user-friendly documentation websites, emphasizing design and ease of use. In contrast, Rest.li places its focus on providing a robust infrastructure for building high-performance RESTful APIs, ensuring scalability and efficiency.
Customization Options: ReadMe Build offers a wide range of customization options for designing documentation websites, allowing developers to tailor the appearance and functionality to suit their needs. On the other hand, Rest.li provides extensive tools and libraries specifically for creating RESTful APIs, offering more customization options in terms of API functionality and behavior.
Integration Capabilities: ReadMe Build seamlessly integrates with various platforms and services to enhance the documentation experience, enabling features such as interactive API consoles and code samples. In comparison, Rest.li is deeply integrated with LinkedIn's infrastructure and leverages its own set of tools and frameworks for building APIs within the company's ecosystem.
Community Support: ReadMe Build has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively provide support, share resources, and contribute to the platform's development. Conversely, Rest.li, being more aligned with LinkedIn's internal ecosystem, has a more limited external community but benefits from continuous development and support from LinkedIn's team.
Scalability and Performance: While ReadMe Build focuses on creating visually appealing and accessible documentation websites, Rest.li prioritizes scalability and performance, providing features and optimizations tailored for handling large-scale API operations efficiently.

In Summary, ReadMe Build is geared towards creating user-friendly documentation websites with a strong emphasis on design, while Rest.li is a framework specifically designed for building scalable and high-performance RESTful APIs within LinkedIn's ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rest.li	ReadMe Build
Rest.li is an open source REST framework for building robust, scalable RESTful architectures using type-safe bindings and asynchronous, non-blocking IO. Rest.li fills a niche for applying RESTful principals at scale with an end-to-end developer workflow for buildings REST APIs that promotes clean REST practices, uniform interface design and consistent data modeling.	Build allows you to really easily move from code to deployed services without ever having to worry about provisioning, setting up and managing servers. You focus on code, we handle the rest - simple.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 556	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 14	Stacks 3
Followers 39	Followers 14
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	ReadMe.io npm

What are some alternatives to Rest.li, ReadMe Build?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

ReadMe Build vs Rest.li: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between ReadMe Build and Rest.li.

Target Audience: ReadMe Build is ideal for developers looking to quickly create beautiful documentation websites, while Rest.li is a framework designed for building scalable RESTful APIs at LinkedIn.
Focus: ReadMe Build focuses on creating appealing and user-friendly documentation websites, emphasizing design and ease of use. In contrast, Rest.li places its focus on providing a robust infrastructure for building high-performance RESTful APIs, ensuring scalability and efficiency.
Customization Options: ReadMe Build offers a wide range of customization options for designing documentation websites, allowing developers to tailor the appearance and functionality to suit their needs. On the other hand, Rest.li provides extensive tools and libraries specifically for creating RESTful APIs, offering more customization options in terms of API functionality and behavior.
Integration Capabilities: ReadMe Build seamlessly integrates with various platforms and services to enhance the documentation experience, enabling features such as interactive API consoles and code samples. In comparison, Rest.li is deeply integrated with LinkedIn's infrastructure and leverages its own set of tools and frameworks for building APIs within the company's ecosystem.
Community Support: ReadMe Build has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively provide support, share resources, and contribute to the platform's development. Conversely, Rest.li, being more aligned with LinkedIn's internal ecosystem, has a more limited external community but benefits from continuous development and support from LinkedIn's team.
Scalability and Performance: While ReadMe Build focuses on creating visually appealing and accessible documentation websites, Rest.li prioritizes scalability and performance, providing features and optimizations tailored for handling large-scale API operations efficiently.

ReadMe Build vs Rest.li

Overview