StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Stimulus

React vs Stimulus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Stimulus
Stimulus
Stacks132
Followers106
Votes16

React vs Stimulus: What are the differences?

Introduction

React and Stimulus are two popular frameworks used for building web applications. While both aim to enhance the user experience and make development easier, they have distinct differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between React and Stimulus.

  1. Virtual DOM vs Direct DOM Manipulation: One key difference between React and Stimulus is the approach they take to updating the user interface. React uses a virtual DOM, which is a lightweight representation of the actual DOM. When there are changes in the data, React updates the virtual DOM first and then efficiently updates only the necessary parts of the actual DOM. On the other hand, Stimulus directly manipulates the DOM, making changes to the HTML elements directly. This can be simpler for small applications but may lead to performance issues in larger, more complex applications.

  2. Component-Based vs Controller-Based: React is a component-based framework, meaning that the UI is built as a composition of reusable, self-contained components. Each component manages its own state and can be reused throughout the application. Stimulus, on the other hand, follows a controller-based approach. It focuses on enhancing the behavior of existing HTML elements by attaching JavaScript behavior to them. Controllers in Stimulus handle the interaction and behavior of the elements they are associated with.

  3. Virtual DOM Reconciliation vs Manual DOM Updates: In React, when there are changes to the data, React performs a process called reconciliation to update the virtual DOM and eventually reflect the changes in the actual DOM. This process is automatic and efficient, as React only updates the necessary parts of the DOM. In Stimulus, since it directly manipulates the DOM, developers need to manually update the DOM when there are changes. This can be more error-prone and time-consuming compared to React's automatic reconciliation process.

  4. Rich Ecosystem vs Lightweight Framework: React has a rich and extensive ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, tools, and community support. It offers many additional features, such as state management solutions (like Redux and MobX) and routing libraries (like React Router). Stimulus, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework with a smaller ecosystem. It focuses on providing a simple and lightweight solution for behavior and interactivity of HTML elements without introducing additional complexities.

  5. JavaScript vs TypeScript: React is commonly used with JavaScript, but it also has extensive support for TypeScript, a statically-typed superset of JavaScript. TypeScript provides additional type checking and tooling capabilities, making the development process more robust and less prone to errors. Stimulus, on the other hand, primarily focuses on JavaScript, but it can also work with TypeScript to some extent. However, the TypeScript support in Stimulus is not as extensive as in React.

  6. Libraries vs Minimal Dependencies: React comes with a set of powerful libraries and tools that can be used in conjunction with it to enhance development productivity and efficiency. These libraries include popular ones like React Router, Redux, and Jest for testing. Stimulus, being a lightweight framework, has minimal dependencies and does not come with an extensive set of libraries. It aims to provide a minimalistic solution for enhancing interactivity in HTML elements without introducing additional dependencies.

In summary, React and Stimulus differ in their approach to handling the user interface updates, the structure of the application, the way DOM updates are managed, the ecosystem they offer, the level of TypeScript support, and the dependencies they come with.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Stimulus

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Stimulus
Stimulus

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Stimulus is a JavaScript framework with modest ambitions. It doesn't seek to take over your entire front-end—in fact, it's not concerned with rendering HTML at all.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
132
Followers
147.0K
Followers
106
Votes
4.1K
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 5
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 5
    No Javascript on Backend
  • 4
    Balance between Front End and BackEnd
  • 2
    Easy way to add functionality to rails views
Cons
  • 2
    Steep learning curve
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to React, Stimulus?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase