StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs RxJS

React vs RxJS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
RxJS
RxJS
Stacks4.4K
Followers638
Votes21
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks2.1K

React vs RxJS: What are the differences?

Key Differences between React and RxJS

1. Component-based vs Event-driven: React is primarily a component-based library for building user interfaces. It focuses on organizing applications into reusable and composable UI components. On the other hand, RxJS is a library for managing asynchronous and event-based programming. It provides a set of tools for creating and manipulating streams of values over time.

2. Reactive Programming paradigm: RxJS follows the reactive programming paradigm, which emphasizes the propagation of data changes through asynchronous streams. It provides powerful operators to transform, filter, combine, and manipulate the data streams. React, on the other hand, does not strictly adhere to the reactive programming paradigm. It focuses more on the UI rendering and updating based on state changes.

3. State Management: React provides a state management mechanism through the use of local component state or global state libraries like Redux or MobX. It allows components to maintain and update their own state, leading to a predictable and organized flow of data. RxJS, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and reactive approach to state management. It allows the creation of state streams that can be subscribed to and updated in a reactive manner.

4. UI Rendering and DOM manipulation: React is specifically designed for efficient rendering of user interfaces. It uses a virtual DOM diffing algorithm to identify and update only the necessary components that have changed. This results in optimized performance and minimal DOM manipulation. RxJS, on the other hand, is not focused on UI rendering and DOM manipulation. It primarily deals with data streams and does not provide specific tools or optimizations for managing the UI.

5. Complexity and Learning Curve: React has a relatively lower learning curve compared to RxJS. It follows a straightforward component-based model, making it easier to understand and work with for developers familiar with HTML and JavaScript. RxJS, on the other hand, introduces a new programming paradigm and a wide range of operators, which may require a more significant learning effort for developers new to reactive programming.

6. Community and Ecosystem: React has a large and vibrant community with extensive documentation, resources, and a wide range of third-party libraries and tools. Due to its popularity, developers can easily find solutions and support for their development needs. RxJS also has a growing community, but it is relatively smaller compared to React. The ecosystem around RxJS is focused more on reactive programming and asynchronous data streams.

In summary, React and RxJS are both powerful libraries for web development, but they serve different purposes. React is primarily focused on building reusable UI components and efficient rendering, while RxJS is focused on managing asynchronous data streams and enabling reactive programming paradigms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, RxJS

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
RxJS
RxJS

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
4.4K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
638
Votes
4.1K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 6
    Easier async data chaining and combining
  • 3
    Steep learning curve, but offers predictable operations
  • 2
    Observable subjects
  • 2
    Works great with any state management implementation
  • 2
    Easier testing
Cons
  • 3
    Steep learning curve

What are some alternatives to React, RxJS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase