StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Riot

React vs Riot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Riot
Riot
Stacks116
Followers100
Votes68
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks966

React vs Riot: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between React and Riot. React and Riot are both popular JavaScript libraries used for building user interfaces, but they have some distinct features that set them apart from each other.

  1. Virtual DOM vs. Simpler DOM Manipulation: One key difference between React and Riot is their approach to manipulating the DOM. React uses a Virtual DOM, which is an abstract representation of the actual DOM, allowing for efficient updates and rendering of components. On the other hand, Riot focuses on simpler DOM manipulation, directly altering the real DOM, which may lead to slightly higher performance in certain scenarios.

  2. Component-Level Scope vs. Global Scope: React and Riot differ in how they handle the scope of variables and state within components. React components have their own isolated scope, allowing for easy encapsulation and reusability. In Riot, variables and state are shared across all components by default, requiring careful management and organization of variables to prevent clashes.

  3. Size and Footprint: React is a larger library compared to Riot. React includes a wide range of built-in features and capabilities, making it a more comprehensive solution for building complex applications. On the other hand, Riot is a lightweight library that focuses on minimalism and simplicity, providing a smaller footprint and faster loading times for simpler projects.

  4. Render Methods: React components use a render method, which returns the JSX (JavaScript XML) that defines the component's structure and functionality. This JSX is then compiled into JavaScript by a tool like Babel. In contrast, Riot components use a template-based approach, where HTML-like syntax is used directly within the component definition, making it easier to write and understand the component structure.

  5. Lifecycle Hooks: React provides a comprehensive set of lifecycle hooks, such as componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate, which allow developers to execute code at specific points in a component's lifecycle. Riot, on the other hand, has a simpler set of lifecycle hooks, with fewer options to interact with component lifecycles. This can make React more suitable for complex applications with intricate lifecycle requirements.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: React has a large and vibrant ecosystem, with a vast number of third-party libraries, tools, and resources available. It is widely adopted by a large community of developers, which can provide helpful support and resources. Riot, although still popular, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, which may result in fewer available resources and libraries.

In summary, React and Riot differ in their approach to DOM manipulation, scope handling, size and footprint, render methods, lifecycle hooks, and ecosystem/community support. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the most appropriate library for their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Riot

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Riot
Riot

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Absolutely the smallest possible amount of DOM updates and reflows.;One way data flow: updates and unmounts are propagated downwards from parent to children.;Expressions are pre-compiled and cached for high performance.;Lifecycle events for more control.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
966
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
116
Followers
147.0K
Followers
100
Votes
4.1K
Votes
68
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 13
    Its just easy... no training wheels needed
  • 13
    Light weight. Fast. Clear
  • 11
    Very simple, fast
  • 9
    Straightforward
  • 6
    Minimalistic
Cons
  • 1
    Smaller community

What are some alternatives to React, Riot?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preact

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase