Velocity.js vs react-three-fiber

Overview

Velocity.js

Stacks6

Followers26

Votes0

GitHub Stars17.3K

Forks1.5K

react-three-fiber

Stacks52

Followers46

Votes0

Velocity.js vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Velocity.js and react-three-fiber are both popular libraries used in web development, offering unique features and capabilities for creating dynamic and interactive web applications. Below are key differences between Velocity.js and react-three-fiber.

Animation Capabilities: Velocity.js is primarily focused on animating DOM elements and properties, making it suitable for creating smooth and responsive animations for web interfaces. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is specifically designed for creating 3D graphics and animations using the Three.js library, making it ideal for developing immersive 3D visualizations and experiences.
Usage: Velocity.js is typically used in conjunction with other front-end frameworks like jQuery or vanilla JavaScript to enhance the animation capabilities of web applications. In contrast, react-three-fiber is a standalone library that integrates directly with React, allowing developers to easily create complex 3D scenes and animations within a React application.
Rendering: Velocity.js utilizes CSS transitions and animations to render and animate DOM elements, providing a high level of control over how elements move and behave on the screen. React-three-fiber, on the other hand, leverages WebGL and the Three.js rendering engine to create high-performance 3D graphics, enabling developers to build intricate 3D scenes and effects.
Community Support: Velocity.js has been around for a longer period of time and has a larger community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and resources for developers looking to implement animations in their projects. While react-three-fiber is relatively newer, it has quickly gained popularity among developers interested in 3D web development, with a growing community and resources available to support its use.
Learning Curve: Velocity.js is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for developers new to web animation or those looking for a lightweight solution for adding animations to their projects. In contrast, react-three-fiber has a steeper learning curve due to its 3D nature and integration with the Three.js library, requiring a deeper understanding of 3D graphics concepts and React development principles.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Velocity.js is optimized for animating DOM elements efficiently, offering smooth animations with minimal impact on the overall performance of the web application. React-three-fiber, while capable of producing stunning 3D visuals, may require more resources and careful optimization to maintain smooth framerates and responsiveness in complex 3D scenes.

In Summary, the key differences between Velocity.js and react-three-fiber lie in their focus on animation types, usage within web development frameworks, rendering technologies, community support, learning curve, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Velocity.js	react-three-fiber
It is an animation engine with the same API as jQuery's $.animate(). It works with and without jQuery. It is the best of jQuery and CSS transitions combined.	It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.
Color animation; Transforms; Loops; Easings; SVG support; Scrolling.	React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
GitHub Stars 17.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 6	Stacks 52
Followers 26	Followers 46
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Dojo layerJS ZingGrid fancybox DNN Stencil Blazejs Pilot jQWidgets UDash	React three.js

What are some alternatives to Velocity.js, react-three-fiber?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

Velocity.js vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Animation Capabilities: Velocity.js is primarily focused on animating DOM elements and properties, making it suitable for creating smooth and responsive animations for web interfaces. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is specifically designed for creating 3D graphics and animations using the Three.js library, making it ideal for developing immersive 3D visualizations and experiences.
Usage: Velocity.js is typically used in conjunction with other front-end frameworks like jQuery or vanilla JavaScript to enhance the animation capabilities of web applications. In contrast, react-three-fiber is a standalone library that integrates directly with React, allowing developers to easily create complex 3D scenes and animations within a React application.
Rendering: Velocity.js utilizes CSS transitions and animations to render and animate DOM elements, providing a high level of control over how elements move and behave on the screen. React-three-fiber, on the other hand, leverages WebGL and the Three.js rendering engine to create high-performance 3D graphics, enabling developers to build intricate 3D scenes and effects.
Community Support: Velocity.js has been around for a longer period of time and has a larger community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and resources for developers looking to implement animations in their projects. While react-three-fiber is relatively newer, it has quickly gained popularity among developers interested in 3D web development, with a growing community and resources available to support its use.
Learning Curve: Velocity.js is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for developers new to web animation or those looking for a lightweight solution for adding animations to their projects. In contrast, react-three-fiber has a steeper learning curve due to its 3D nature and integration with the Three.js library, requiring a deeper understanding of 3D graphics concepts and React development principles.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Velocity.js is optimized for animating DOM elements efficiently, offering smooth animations with minimal impact on the overall performance of the web application. React-three-fiber, while capable of producing stunning 3D visuals, may require more resources and careful optimization to maintain smooth framerates and responsiveness in complex 3D scenes.

Velocity.js vs react-three-fiber

Overview