React Native Material Design vs TypeScript

Overview

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

React Native Material Design

Stacks30

Followers135

Votes5

React Native Material Design vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Development Philosophy: React Native Material Design is focused on offering pre-built components that follow Google's material design principles, ensuring a visually consistent user interface. On the other hand, TypeScript aims to enhance JavaScript by adding static typing, allowing developers to catch errors during development.
Component Library Integration: React Native Material Design provides a ready-to-use library of components inspired by material design, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing applications. In contrast, TypeScript is a language that can be integrated into various frameworks and libraries, providing type-checking capabilities across projects.
Community Support: React Native Material Design benefits from the vast community of developers using React Native, allowing for easier adoption and support. In comparison, TypeScript has a growing community of developers who value the additional safety and clarity it brings to JavaScript development.
Learning Curve: React Native Material Design can be easier for developers already familiar with React Native, as they can leverage existing knowledge to incorporate material design principles. TypeScript, being a superset of JavaScript, requires some time for developers to adjust to the syntax and typing system.
Performance: React Native Material Design may offer better performance in terms of rendering UI components smoothly due to its optimized design for mobile applications. TypeScript, being a language feature, does not have a direct impact on performance but can lead to better code quality and fewer runtime errors.
Flexibility and Customization: React Native Material Design provides a set of predefined components that may limit customization options for developers. In contrast, TypeScript offers flexibility in how developers structure their code and types, allowing for more customization based on project requirements.

In Summary, React Native Material Design focuses on material design components for visual consistency, while TypeScript enhances JavaScript with static typing for improved error detection and code quality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on TypeScript, React Native Material Design

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

TypeScript	React Native Material Design
TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.	An open source project which aims to bring Material Design to Android through React Native by Facebook. The library is made up of many components, which can be found in the sidebar.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 106.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 13.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 105.1K	Stacks 30
Followers 74.2K	Followers 135
Votes 503	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype	Pros 4 Unmaintained 1 Android-only
Integrations
No integrations available	React Native

What are some alternatives to TypeScript, React Native Material Design?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

React Native Material Design vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Development Philosophy: React Native Material Design is focused on offering pre-built components that follow Google's material design principles, ensuring a visually consistent user interface. On the other hand, TypeScript aims to enhance JavaScript by adding static typing, allowing developers to catch errors during development.
Component Library Integration: React Native Material Design provides a ready-to-use library of components inspired by material design, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing applications. In contrast, TypeScript is a language that can be integrated into various frameworks and libraries, providing type-checking capabilities across projects.
Community Support: React Native Material Design benefits from the vast community of developers using React Native, allowing for easier adoption and support. In comparison, TypeScript has a growing community of developers who value the additional safety and clarity it brings to JavaScript development.
Learning Curve: React Native Material Design can be easier for developers already familiar with React Native, as they can leverage existing knowledge to incorporate material design principles. TypeScript, being a superset of JavaScript, requires some time for developers to adjust to the syntax and typing system.
Performance: React Native Material Design may offer better performance in terms of rendering UI components smoothly due to its optimized design for mobile applications. TypeScript, being a language feature, does not have a direct impact on performance but can lead to better code quality and fewer runtime errors.
Flexibility and Customization: React Native Material Design provides a set of predefined components that may limit customization options for developers. In contrast, TypeScript offers flexibility in how developers structure their code and types, allowing for more customization based on project requirements.

React Native Material Design vs TypeScript

Overview